I see, you refer to logic when bringing up the straw-man rule yet engage in ad hominem when it suits you.
Well since you didn't bother to investigate what came with the collector edition, your entire rant about being upset that these are not 'legal' poker cards is worthless. You made a wrongful assumption and because your assumption was not based on any facts, your complaint is not valid.
Seems to me like you did make an assumption.
Well since you didn't bother to investigate what came with the collector edition, your entire rant about being upset that these are not 'legal' poker cards is worthless. You made a wrongful assumption and because your assumption was not based on any facts, your complaint is not valid.
Seems to me like you did make an assumption.
You also engaged in ad hominem, several times in fact.
No, I didn't investigate, oh my, what a terrible person I am for opening my box (and wanting to be surprised by the little gifts I got), seeing a pack of playing cards marked as "playing cards" and making the HORRIBLE OUTRAGEOUS assumption they would be standard playing cards, ya know, like every other deck of playing cards in the world (outside of MTG and whatnot).
What a horrible crime.
