Obsidian/Bethesda differences

Post » Sat Jun 18, 2011 8:05 am

There's a couple of differences

At the time Softworks didn't have any games that it was promoting, now currently we have RAGE, Prey 2 and Skyrim that Softworks is promoting.

Patches, instead of BGS and Softworks just waiting for the final DLC and then patching it, they are doing the patches before hand and then possibly fixing any new bugs that appear in the DLC.
User avatar
Lalla Vu
 
Posts: 3411
Joined: Wed Jul 19, 2006 9:40 am

Post » Sat Jun 18, 2011 8:23 am

I never took Obsidian very seriously and have next to no respect for them as developers.
But if it wasn't for Obsidian, Fallout wouldn't exist... However I think the future of Fallout needs to be left in the hands of professionals; The Bethesda dev team.
Their next project after Skyrim will hopefully be Fallout 4...

this^

i like FO:NV but its just not as good as FO3. and the DLC's are handled very well
User avatar
Poetic Vice
 
Posts: 3440
Joined: Wed Oct 31, 2007 8:19 pm

Post » Fri Jun 17, 2011 9:55 pm

Maybe if Todd Howard stop acting so inmature and start acting like a professional, may I start hoping for a good future of Bethesda (Why they fired the Morrowind writters?)
User avatar
Ysabelle
 
Posts: 3413
Joined: Sat Jul 08, 2006 5:58 pm

Previous

Return to Fallout: New Vegas