For driving, grilling, and cooking (the "distinction" between these last two is incredibly hilarious IMO) I doubt any difference exists. That said, there are natural characteristics that do cause a statistical favoring for either men or women in specific tasks. Add to that the societal feedback and even more tasks can be added to the categories. So it is true that with certain things an average man or woman will do better then the other.
It's actually "myths" like these I dislike when Mythbusters does them, because the one major flaw in mythbusters is their limited scope in testing. For many myths it doesn't matter, like when testing a good many hollywood myths, but for myths that have a statistical aspect, mythbusters has a horrible sample size most of the time.
You are absolutely right. I remember the "Beer Goggles" episode was exactly like this. They even said "we need a large sample size," and so they used
three whole people.I was embarrassed for them. But it's ok, their ideas are really there as just a proof of concept. If it's possible at all, or not possible at all, then they've done their job. I don't think they really intend to profile society statistically.
I'm sure that on 'technical things' like cooking and driving, both genders will be equal, but once you get into the more physical stuff, men will come on top.
Haha. Gotta keep a clean mind when reading this quote.