You do have a choice. Several choices, in fact:
You could do what Bal tells you to do. Completes the quest and gets it out of your journal.
You could find the priest and kill him on the spot. Fails the quest, but gets it out of your journal.
You could simply walk out of the house, never go after the priest, and never return. Quest stays in your journal, and you can always do it later if you change your mind.
You could do what Bal tells you to do. Completes the quest and gets it out of your journal.
You could find the priest and kill him on the spot. Fails the quest, but gets it out of your journal.
You could simply walk out of the house, never go after the priest, and never return. Quest stays in your journal, and you can always do it later if you change your mind.
Again, I'm not obsessive about the quest journal. The quest journal is of no concern to me.
The quest just svcks. If you're "evil", then you arguably shouldn't be initiating it in the first place as the beginning involves assisting a card-carrying do-gooder, and if you're "good" then you either have to abort it or complete it under the rationalization that the priest deserves a good bludgeoning. That's it. That's all you can do. There's a decided lack of options here, and simply disregarding the quest or not finishing it does not count as a choice. It's anti-choice.
At least the other Daedric quests that can only be played out one way have the decency to be unique or mildly interesting in some fashion. The House of Horrors, by contrast, is not interesting at all. It's "This priest has been descrating my shrine. Bring him to me." That's it. It's garbage. It's completely phoned in.

