[POLL] Falkreath shouldn't have it's own hold!

Post » Thu Jun 07, 2012 7:53 am

I don't get winterhold, sure it fell apart but that was 80 years ago.
The devs are cunning.They shaped the landscape in such a way that Winterhold barely has any space for new buildings. It's a great excuse, isn't it?
User avatar
Michael Korkia
 
Posts: 3498
Joined: Mon Jul 23, 2007 7:58 pm

Post » Thu Jun 07, 2012 5:28 pm

Falkreath, Morthal, Dawnstar, and Winterhold are all terrible excuses for "cities". They all feel exactly the same, because they all use the same building models, and there is no real unique characteristics to any of those 4 cities. I guess winterhold has the college, but i consider that separate (and i yeah i know most of the city of winterhold fell into the ocean, how convenient). It was super disappointing when i first discovered these "cities". They definitely should not be hold capitals. Oblivions cities were 10 times better, and that game is like 6 years old now.
User avatar
megan gleeson
 
Posts: 3493
Joined: Wed Feb 07, 2007 2:01 pm

Post » Thu Jun 07, 2012 4:04 am

I don't get winterhold, sure it fell apart but that was 80 years ago.

I tend to think that the story behind Winterhold was just an excuse to minimize the work on the town. The story is one that has a lot of potential, but when I look at what is actually in the game, there's nothing.

An old and powerful city like Winterhold, devestated by a disaster with most of the city falling off into the ocean...

Oh the things they could have done with that story...

The environment they could have crafted...

Instead, there is absolutely no evidence of the old city. No ruins at the top of the cliffs or at the base. There's no remnants of the collapsing walls that should have surrounded a city of it's importance. There's no remnants of the old houses that once made up the city. No, instead it uses the same stock architecture found in every other minor hold and village. And it uses the same stock ruined houses found elsewhere.

The entire city didn't fall off. Only most of it. There should be some evidence of it somewhere other than the college.
User avatar
Emily Shackleton
 
Posts: 3535
Joined: Sun Feb 11, 2007 12:36 am

Post » Thu Jun 07, 2012 7:04 am

*ahem* it at LEAST has 25 graves, which if you've played the Civil War you'd know is more than enough to bury an army in!

And Meh, Dawnstar's hardly bigger, and Winterhold is tiny now (but didn't use to be) so I guess it can have its own hold. Odd that it only has (had) one settlement in it other than itself though

Only 25? Looking at the middle-age-esque conditions and obvious lack of hygene that is actually a miracle.
User avatar
Marcia Renton
 
Posts: 3563
Joined: Fri Jan 26, 2007 5:15 am

Post » Thu Jun 07, 2012 6:28 am

What about Morthal? Even Dawnstar? Those too are very small but they have their own holds. The only way to justify that it shouldn't have its own hold is to add a larger city in the area, which may not fit well into the game(since you would have to make room for it). I think its fine the way it is. Sure, its capital is small, and there's not much to do, but we can't expect every area to contend with Solitude or Riften.
User avatar
Myles
 
Posts: 3341
Joined: Sun Oct 21, 2007 12:52 pm

Post » Thu Jun 07, 2012 1:58 pm

No. If it should, then there should also be a Dawnstar Hold, Markarth Hold, Solitude Hold, Windhelm Hold, etc. A Hold doesn't have to be named after its capital.

Yes but it IS called Falkreath Hold in the game, which doesn't make a lot of sense if the capital is Helgen, which he suggested
User avatar
Ebony Lawson
 
Posts: 3504
Joined: Fri Feb 16, 2007 11:00 am

Post » Thu Jun 07, 2012 5:44 pm

Uh this is pretty silly. And yeah it would be nice if Falkreath and villages like Morthal were as big and unique as Whiterun but would you rather just not have them exist?

It even says in the impereal hand book that 5 of the holds are nothing more than villages. That's just fine with me I mean look at some of our state capitals, some are pretty small.

Falkreath is my favorite village BTW, reminds me of home.
User avatar
Anthony Rand
 
Posts: 3439
Joined: Wed May 09, 2007 5:02 am

Post » Thu Jun 07, 2012 1:38 pm

Uh this is pretty silly. And yeah it would be nice if Falkreath and villages like Morthal were as big and unique as Whiterun but would you rather just not have them exist?

It even says in the impereal hand book that 5 of the holds are nothing more than villages. That's just fine with me I mean look at some of our state capitals, some are pretty small.

Falkreath is my favorite village BTW, reminds me of home.
User avatar
Céline Rémy
 
Posts: 3443
Joined: Sat Apr 07, 2007 12:45 am

Post » Thu Jun 07, 2012 3:21 am

Uh this is pretty silly. And yeah it would be nice if Falkreath and villages like Morthal were as big and unique as Whiterun but would you rather just not have them exist?

It even says in the impereal hand book that 5 of the holds are nothing more than villages. That's just fine with me I mean look at some of our state capitals, some are pretty small.

Falkreath is my favorite village BTW, reminds me of home.
User avatar
NIloufar Emporio
 
Posts: 3366
Joined: Tue Dec 19, 2006 6:18 pm

Post » Thu Jun 07, 2012 3:42 pm

Wheres the poll? Its no smaller than Dawnstar or Winterhold or Morthal.
User avatar
Dan Endacott
 
Posts: 3419
Joined: Fri Jul 06, 2007 9:12 am

Post » Thu Jun 07, 2012 11:40 am

any city in skyrim barely deserves to be called a hold. seriously, how many people live in solitude?
User avatar
Len swann
 
Posts: 3466
Joined: Mon Jun 18, 2007 5:02 pm

Post » Thu Jun 07, 2012 3:04 am

Falkreath is extremely small to be for having its own hold.

Per' se it shouldn't! It should be like Riverwood, as it is exactly like Riverwood but with a hold!

Should Falkreath have a hold or not? What do you think?

Why is everyone forgetting Morthal? :'(
User avatar
Kat Ives
 
Posts: 3408
Joined: Tue Aug 28, 2007 2:11 pm

Post » Thu Jun 07, 2012 11:15 am

any city in skyrim barely deserves to be called a hold. seriously, how many people live in solitude?
But cities aren't holds....
User avatar
butterfly
 
Posts: 3467
Joined: Wed Aug 16, 2006 8:20 pm

Post » Thu Jun 07, 2012 2:20 am

Why is everyone forgetting Morthal? :'(

That should tell you something about Morthal.
User avatar
Josee Leach
 
Posts: 3371
Joined: Tue Dec 26, 2006 10:50 pm

Post » Thu Jun 07, 2012 5:01 pm

any city in skyrim barely deserves to be called a hold. seriously, how many people live in solitude?
THIS!
All of the towns and cities sizes and populations are a joke.
User avatar
Ezekiel Macallister
 
Posts: 3493
Joined: Fri Jun 22, 2007 12:08 pm

Post » Thu Jun 07, 2012 8:42 am

I don't get why Solitude is the capital of Skyrim. It's smaller than Windhelm AND it was built by imperials. Wtf?????? Windhelm is actually a nord built city.
And yes, Falkreath is pretty much just a town. Every city in Skyrim is a town, the major ones are walled towns. Whiterun is a town, Markarth is a town.
User avatar
Aaron Clark
 
Posts: 3439
Joined: Fri Oct 26, 2007 2:23 pm

Post » Thu Jun 07, 2012 2:22 am

I don't see why it's Falkreath hold when Helgen seems like it was the larger city, and actually had a wall surrounding it like the major cities (still kind of does). It's almost as though everybody already knew Helgen would be destroyed, which is true from a developer standpoint, I suppose, but not from an in-game viewpoint.
User avatar
Jessica White
 
Posts: 3419
Joined: Sun Aug 20, 2006 5:03 am

Post » Thu Jun 07, 2012 12:02 pm

Also, I was counting the NPC's in the imperial city in Oblivion by looking at UESP and I lost count at around 80 npc's. I remember people saying "lol there are only like 20 people in the imperial city". Well 80+ npc's in the imperial city is more than npc's in all cities in skyrim combined.
User avatar
Natalie Harvey
 
Posts: 3433
Joined: Fri Aug 18, 2006 12:15 pm

Post » Thu Jun 07, 2012 2:09 am

And yet the dragons seem to consider it the greatest threat, what with all the attacks on it!

Well, the College of Winterhold is right there! :P So what if the dragons' aim is slightly off?
User avatar
Ilona Neumann
 
Posts: 3308
Joined: Sat Aug 19, 2006 3:30 am

Post » Thu Jun 07, 2012 2:15 pm

Also, I was counting the NPC's in the imperial city in Oblivion by looking at UESP and I lost count at around 80 npc's. I remember people saying "lol there are only like 20 people in the imperial city". Well 80+ npc's in the imperial city is more than npc's in all cities in skyrim combined.

The Imperial City has almost 6 sections.

It is larger than any city in Skyrim AND any city in Oblivion.

You cannot compare the IC to ANY OTHER CITY EVER.

So please, do not use it as a reference to how a city "should be". A true city in Skyrim should match any city (besides the IC) in Oblivion.

*granted* If we want to measure a city's legit status based on count of NPCs and buildings.

IF we want to do that. Bethesda may have thought that these cities were here based on LORE, not on what one player believed what constitutes a "city".
User avatar
Ymani Hood
 
Posts: 3514
Joined: Fri Oct 26, 2007 3:22 am

Previous

Return to V - Skyrim