the rating at gamespot fits, even in the poll on this thread, so far 12 people want more combat at 2 people don't, lol so the rating is right, over 90% want more combat, you're only one of two people so far to vote no on more combat, so you're a minority on this and fallout new vegas in the combat department didn't do so well, in a lot of other areas is surpassed FO3 easily, but dungeon diving and good batlezones are something people want in a fallout game, so it needs a little more, i can hardly find any ceasers legion anywhere unless i travel to their fort on the hill, thats about the only spot, they're the main enemy, i should have all kinds of ceasers legions units to kill, but they aren't around.
I don't see how you can say the rating fits as if it's a fact. Equally the poll and the content of this thread is too vague to guage a real response. Even i was swaying over which option to pick.
As i said in my other post i wouldn't mind if there were areas of higher powered enemies added onto the game or even something like gabriel suggested with a scripted event of a group getting more powerful and changing their base of operations (as long as the integrity of the world is maintained). What i don't want is the idea that the wasteland suddenly quadruples in population and becomes an implausibly hostile enviroment. A lot of what is good about the game derives from the atmosphere of the world and increasing the number and type of enemies just so you can kill more stuff and watch more slo-mo exploding heads is not a positive thing and that's what seems to be (at least partially) argued for.
If you want more combat why not attack the NCR?
