[The issue is not, and has never been, the legality.]
False. The issue of legality has been indeed raised. You in fact, replied to one post raising it. Which makes this claim in particular all the more laughable :whistling:
They're raising nonissues. EULAs aren't legally binding in many countries, and are often unenforcable even when they are. Copying content on your own computer for personal use is legal. Claiming something is an issue does not make it one, particularly when past port projects haven't recieved any form of legal challenge.
[The issue is Bethesda cannot be seen to condone or encourage the use of content that it licensed for one game (FO3) in another game it has not licensed it for (FNV).]
1st: It's completely beyond me why you consider yourself entitled to arbitrarily determine what the issue is or is not in a thread which you haven't created nor the main poster :shrug:
2nd: Have you any evidence of that, or are you just guessing what Bethesda can or cannot do? That's at any rate a moot point. If content is not being distributed there's nothing wrong, or at least Bethesda doesn't think so. There are countless instances of mods that use unlicensed content being discussed in this forum, and none of them have been shut down. If you need a quick example, mods that port STALKER armors into F3.
The STALKER devs granted permission to reuse their content, actually. That'd be the only mod discussed here that uses ported content, all the rest go to Fallout3Underground. There are mods on Nexus that use ported Fallout 3 content, but as small mods porting minimal amounts of content with relatively small numbers of downloads they don't land on the PR radar. Big projects like a full port? Yes. I worked on Morroblivion, Bethesda had it taken down from Nexus and banned from discussion here. Admittedly I can't say for absolute 100% sure that it's down to licensing issues, but given their language and responses to the various Morroblivion project groups that's the only real contender. It's either that, or they're simply jerks who hate fun; no other arguments fit.
The thread is the Nth thread about making a port. I don't need to be the OP or main poster to say what the issues involved in making a port are.
The rest of your post pretty much falls into the above snipets' replies. On another note, my post's main purpose was to respond to the claim Bethesda probably wouldn't act if the port were released. You were so eager to insult me you apparently missed that. So you might want to try and read other people's posts more carefully before replying, specially if your reply is going to be aggressive.
Bethesda
have acted on ports in the past, that don't redistribute content- look at Morroblivion. Your post implied they would only care if the port did redistribute content which is, as a matter of record, not true.
I think I'm entitled to get a bit annoyed when this thread pops up for the dozenth time with exactly the same content as ever, no?