"This is from another thread but as said deserves repeating"
I'll repeat this since it deserves repeating:
Name one other place you could pay for something and be delivered and unusable product and find that acceptable?
-Lemon laws were made to prevent that from being done with cars (yeah, its illegal)
-What about a sandwich that was completely rotten and inedible?
-What about a computer that didn't even turn on?
We as consumers were promised a functional game, we were not asked to be QA or beta testers, instead a large portion of the community was delivered a game that either didn't run at all, barely ran, or at best didn't run according to what was promised at the time of purchase.
As a consumer we have every right, expectation, and responsibility to speak up when we have been delivered a faulty bill of goods.
Delivering a half-finished product should not be the norm and the stunt pulled by id/Beth is absolutely no exception. $60 is the price for a fully finished game, if they plan to deliver half-finished, bug-ridden or faulty games, they should make that known ahead of time and charge far less, or at the very least offer a partial refund, much like a restaurant would do if a diner's meal was not served to satisfaction.
Demanding fair trade in return for payment is more than fair and those coming in here to put those down and claim otherwise are both wrong and foolish.
