Subatomic particles exceeded lightspeed?

Post » Fri Sep 23, 2011 10:39 am

I just read about this baffling news on the internet and couldn't believe it. But apparantly it's true. At the CERN some particles arrived at a station a fraction too soon.

Might this be the end of modern physics as we know it?

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-15017484
User avatar
Carlos Rojas
 
Posts: 3391
Joined: Thu Aug 16, 2007 11:19 am

Post » Fri Sep 23, 2011 3:09 pm

I just read about this baffling news on the internet and couldn't believe it. But apparantly it's true. At the CERN some particles arrived at a station a fraction too soon.

Might this be the end of modern physics as we know it?

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-15017484

nope.

Not even the beginning of the end.


But maybe -finally- the end of the beginning.

one can only hope the monkeys errr.., labrats uhhh... I mean esteemed scientific community free of field related dogma.., finally get it right..
User avatar
Miragel Ginza
 
Posts: 3502
Joined: Thu Dec 21, 2006 6:19 am

Post » Fri Sep 23, 2011 2:59 am

Oh modern physics has been approaching an end for along time.

Although I do find this interesting.
User avatar
Jade
 
Posts: 3520
Joined: Mon Jul 10, 2006 6:42 am

Post » Fri Sep 23, 2011 8:51 am

am no physicist,but heard something about the fact that light gets pulled into a black hole,was also a demonstration of faster than light possibilities (i did not understand it though :shrug: (i think it was something to do with the edge of a black hole speeding up the light :wacko: as i said am no physicist :blush2:
User avatar
Taylor Bakos
 
Posts: 3408
Joined: Mon Jan 15, 2007 12:05 am

Post » Fri Sep 23, 2011 12:09 pm

But maybe -finally- the end of the beginning.


'Bout damn time.
User avatar
Ysabelle
 
Posts: 3413
Joined: Sat Jul 08, 2006 5:58 pm

Post » Fri Sep 23, 2011 7:35 am

Could be the beginning of the warp engine.
User avatar
Dean Ashcroft
 
Posts: 3566
Joined: Wed Jul 25, 2007 1:20 am

Post » Fri Sep 23, 2011 3:42 pm

Just read this today too. Crazy stuff.
User avatar
Cedric Pearson
 
Posts: 3487
Joined: Fri Sep 28, 2007 9:39 pm

Post » Fri Sep 23, 2011 10:28 am

Knew it was possible. :P
User avatar
james kite
 
Posts: 3460
Joined: Sun Jul 22, 2007 8:52 am

Post » Fri Sep 23, 2011 9:12 am

To be honest I travel faster than light most days.

But in all seriousness, if this is true, it's insane.
User avatar
Cayal
 
Posts: 3398
Joined: Tue Jan 30, 2007 6:24 pm

Post » Fri Sep 23, 2011 1:07 pm

Alright, own up. Who broke physics?
User avatar
DAVId Bryant
 
Posts: 3366
Joined: Wed Nov 14, 2007 11:41 pm

Post » Fri Sep 23, 2011 2:20 pm

It cool that they made this discovery but unless we can build some sort of barrier around a ship or probe, you're not going to get very far. Still a nice little step in the right direction I think.
User avatar
Noraima Vega
 
Posts: 3467
Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2007 7:28 am

Post » Fri Sep 23, 2011 4:30 am

Perhaps the muon neutrinos decided to take a path through a hole in spacetime?

On the other hand, special relativity relies on postulates which are assumed to be true. For all we know, there's a paradigm shift incoming.
User avatar
BaNK.RoLL
 
Posts: 3451
Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2007 3:55 pm

Post » Fri Sep 23, 2011 6:22 am

Nice...
:sits down and waits for FTL communications:





*FTL= Faster than light. Took it from Honor Harrington novels which takes place thousands of years in the future.
User avatar
Thema
 
Posts: 3461
Joined: Thu Sep 21, 2006 2:36 am

Post » Fri Sep 23, 2011 1:45 pm

Alright, own up. Who broke physics?

Gravity did. Because it doesnt make any sense at all. :shocking:
User avatar
Love iz not
 
Posts: 3377
Joined: Sat Aug 25, 2007 8:55 pm

Post » Fri Sep 23, 2011 3:33 pm

Nice...
:sits down and waits for FTL communications:


Time for FTL internet. Awww yeah.
User avatar
Dan Scott
 
Posts: 3373
Joined: Sun Nov 11, 2007 3:45 am

Post » Fri Sep 23, 2011 11:32 am

People are forgetting that it was always known that faster-than-light travel is possible. The theory has been blowing back and forth between if it is or not for years now. also, Modern Physics is wrong, and all physicists know it. so many theories of physics too... the quantum theory is one of my faves too.
User avatar
Rachel Tyson
 
Posts: 3434
Joined: Sat Oct 07, 2006 4:42 pm

Post » Fri Sep 23, 2011 9:05 am

Gravity did. Because it doesnt make any sense at all. :shocking:

We're all part of a great cosmic joke anyway...
User avatar
elliot mudd
 
Posts: 3426
Joined: Wed May 09, 2007 8:56 am

Post » Fri Sep 23, 2011 5:00 am

It would be interesting if true. I remember reading some article saying that they believed that was impossible. Silly humans
User avatar
Penny Flame
 
Posts: 3336
Joined: Sat Aug 12, 2006 1:53 am

Post » Fri Sep 23, 2011 12:54 pm

It would be interesting if true. I remember reading some article saying that they believed that was impossible. Silly humans

We've awoke a dev. We are blessed.


Anyway perhaps this might help explain why gravity doesn't exist at a subatomic level.
User avatar
Marcia Renton
 
Posts: 3563
Joined: Fri Jan 26, 2007 5:15 am

Post » Fri Sep 23, 2011 11:25 am

Might this be the end of modern physics as we know it?
Nah, it just means it changes. Nothing breaks the Laws of Physics, it only means our current models need updating to incorporate new information and knowledge.

In reality, we humans hardly know anything. Any chemist, physicist, and mathematician worth their salt knows our models are piss poor, and it's a constant quest to get it as accurate as possible. Physics wasn't wrong, we were.
User avatar
Rob Smith
 
Posts: 3424
Joined: Wed Oct 03, 2007 5:30 pm

Post » Fri Sep 23, 2011 11:22 am

It would be interesting if true. I remember reading some article saying that they believed that was impossible. Silly humans


It is impossible.

Let's say you sit in a stationary chair for 10 minutes, you haven't moved anywhere, right? Wrong, you haven't moved through space but you have moved 10 minutes through time. Now, let's say you're sat in a car for 10 minutes travelling at 15m/s, you're travelling faster, right? Wrong, you're still travelling at the same total speed as you were when you were sat still.

The speed of light is 299,792,458 meters per second. If you're sat still right now, that's how fast you're travelling. You're just travelling that speed through time rather than through space. If you're in car travelling at 15 meters per second, you are borrowing 15 m/s from the speed of light. So now you're travelling 15m/s through space and 299,792,443m/s through time.

Now imagine you're in a spaceship travelling at near the speed of light, let's say 299,792,408m/s. You're travelling through space at 299,792,408m/s and through time at 50m/s, you're still travelling at the same speed as you were when you were stationary. If you speed up so that you are now travelling at the speed of light through space, you're now travelling through space at 299,792,458m/s and travelling through time at 0m/s.

You can't go any faster than that because you've ran out of time to borrow speed from, your total speed will always remain at the speed of light. Either a particle has done the impossible and broken the laws of physics or CERN have messed their numbers up. I'm guessing that it's the latter.
User avatar
Chris Duncan
 
Posts: 3471
Joined: Sun Jun 24, 2007 2:31 am

Post » Fri Sep 23, 2011 9:57 am

1. Break physics
2. Invent hyperspace travel
3. ???
4. Profit
User avatar
sas
 
Posts: 3435
Joined: Thu Aug 03, 2006 8:40 am

Post » Fri Sep 23, 2011 2:13 pm

It is impossible.

Let's say you sit in a stationary chair for 10 minutes, you haven't moved anywhere, right? Wrong, you haven't moved through space but you have moved 10 minutes through time. Now, let's say you're sat in a car for 10 minutes travelling at 15m/s, you're travelling faster, right? Wrong, you're still travelling at the same total speed as you were when you were sat still.

The speed of light is 299,792,458 meters per second. If you're sat still right now, that's how fast you're travelling. You're just travelling that speed through time rather than through space. If you're in car travelling at 15 meters per second, you are borrowing 15 m/s from the speed of light. So now you're travelling 15m/s through space and 299,792,443m/s through time.

Now imagine you're in a spaceship travelling at near the speed of light, let's say 299,792,408m/s. You're travelling through space at 299,792,408m/s and through time at 50m/s, you're still travelling at the same speed as you were when you were stationary. If you speed up so that you are now travelling at the speed of light through space, you're now travelling through space at 299,792,458m/s and travelling through time at 0m/s.

You can't go any faster than that because you've ran out of time to borrow speed from, your total speed will always remain at the speed of light. Either a particle has done the impossible and broken the laws of physics or CERN have messed their numbers up. I'm guessing that it's the latter.

Or perhaps we have the laws wrong?
User avatar
teeny
 
Posts: 3423
Joined: Sun Feb 25, 2007 1:51 am

Post » Fri Sep 23, 2011 2:01 pm

You can't go any faster than that because you've ran out of time to borrow speed from, your total speed will always remain at the speed of light. Either a particle has http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0V7aUT13qtM and broken the laws of physics or CERN have messed their numbers up. I'm guessing that it's the latter.


It's totally gonna be the former.
User avatar
Nicole M
 
Posts: 3501
Joined: Thu Jun 15, 2006 6:31 am

Post » Fri Sep 23, 2011 12:27 pm

There's another possibility -- which is why they are, as they say 'proceeding with caution'. Confusing experimental results MAY also arise from experimental error, equipment problems, and so on. I'm interested, but skeptical. Far too often, experimental results are released far too early (anyone remember cold fusion?).

That said, if it's true, physics is in for really interesting times.
User avatar
Sophie Miller
 
Posts: 3300
Joined: Sun Jun 18, 2006 12:35 am

Next

Return to Othor Games