Is this game any good if....

Post » Sun Mar 06, 2011 9:44 am

Do you think that this game would be good, even if I didn't like Fallout 3? Should I consider getting it, or is it basically the same gameplay as Fallout 3?
User avatar
Jessica Nash
 
Posts: 3424
Joined: Tue Dec 19, 2006 10:18 pm

Post » Sun Mar 06, 2011 12:28 pm

Depends of what aspect of Fallout you didnt like:

If you hated the combat: AVOID
If you hated the story: GET
If you hated the depressive location:GET
User avatar
Nicole Kraus
 
Posts: 3432
Joined: Sat Apr 14, 2007 11:34 pm

Post » Sun Mar 06, 2011 9:26 am

I loved the combat. I hated the location and story. The game was to short. Is New Vegas longer, does it have more quests?
User avatar
Emily abigail Villarreal
 
Posts: 3433
Joined: Mon Aug 27, 2007 9:38 am

Post » Sun Mar 06, 2011 4:48 pm

The combat is tons better than Fallout 3, though. Well, if you consider the big problem with Fallout 3's combat to be "it's everywhere, all the time, take 5 steps and it's another giant radscorpion or Supermutant party."

Thankfully, it's not like that.
User avatar
Laura-Jayne Lee
 
Posts: 3474
Joined: Sun Jul 02, 2006 4:35 pm

Post » Sun Mar 06, 2011 9:01 am

I loved the combat. I hated the location and story. The game was to short. Is New Vegas longer, does it have more quests?


Yes.
User avatar
Alan Whiston
 
Posts: 3358
Joined: Sun May 06, 2007 4:07 pm

Post » Sun Mar 06, 2011 6:54 pm

@Tale

Yeah that annoyed me a lot.
User avatar
Angus Poole
 
Posts: 3594
Joined: Fri Aug 03, 2007 9:04 pm

Post » Sun Mar 06, 2011 8:57 pm

I loved the combat. I hated the location and story. The game was to short. Is New Vegas longer, does it have more quests?

Too short?
User avatar
Budgie
 
Posts: 3518
Joined: Sat Oct 14, 2006 2:26 pm

Post » Sun Mar 06, 2011 2:38 pm

Too short?


It had very few side quests.
User avatar
tannis
 
Posts: 3446
Joined: Sat Dec 09, 2006 11:21 pm

Post » Sun Mar 06, 2011 7:46 am

I loved the combat. I hated the location and story. The game was to short. Is New Vegas longer, does it have more quests?

The main quest has four major paths so there's plenty of replability and if you want to be thorough there's tons to do. My first character went with the NCR and even though I was trying to go through fairly quickly it took my 50 hours (and I was level 23 when I started the finale). In a few characters I'll probably do the NCR again but this time I plan to do all of the NCR side-quests and it will probably take me to level 30 easily.

FONV focuses on factions and stories more than FO3 but has less focus on exploration. It's not that exploration doesn't play a part but the game world isn't as barren so things tend to be closer together.
User avatar
Mark Churchman
 
Posts: 3363
Joined: Sun Aug 05, 2007 5:58 am

Post » Sun Mar 06, 2011 4:29 pm

I would say get it, it's in my opinion a much better story than FO3 and the combat is much more improved.
User avatar
michael danso
 
Posts: 3492
Joined: Wed Jun 13, 2007 9:21 am

Post » Sun Mar 06, 2011 3:17 pm

It had very few side quests.

Don't get too hung up on the amount of quests in the game. Ive done everything in NV and my play times are around the same times they were for F3.
User avatar
Dewayne Quattlebaum
 
Posts: 3529
Joined: Thu Aug 30, 2007 12:29 pm

Post » Sun Mar 06, 2011 8:18 pm

It's hard to answer your question. If you didn't like Fallout 3, there's a good chance that you won't like this one either. New Vegas is improved in a lot of ways, but they're still quite similar games. I did like Fallout 3 a lot, but I think this one happens to be better.
User avatar
SHAWNNA-KAY
 
Posts: 3444
Joined: Mon Dec 18, 2006 1:22 pm

Post » Sun Mar 06, 2011 10:40 pm

Ok thanks for answering my questions. I will consider buying it.
User avatar
Anna Krzyzanowska
 
Posts: 3330
Joined: Thu Aug 03, 2006 3:08 am

Post » Sun Mar 06, 2011 9:53 pm

Also the bugs, not sure about your bug experiences with F3, or what system your on but NV has a lot of bugs, a lot of game breaking ones too.
User avatar
Sophie Louise Edge
 
Posts: 3461
Joined: Sat Oct 21, 2006 7:09 pm

Post » Sun Mar 06, 2011 9:05 am

Yeah, I know about that. Most should be fixed when I get it.
User avatar
rolanda h
 
Posts: 3314
Joined: Tue Mar 27, 2007 9:09 pm

Post » Sun Mar 06, 2011 5:06 pm

You should see if there are any used copies, because it seemed like alot of people threw a tantrum and returned it.
User avatar
Destinyscharm
 
Posts: 3404
Joined: Sun Jul 23, 2006 6:06 pm

Post » Sun Mar 06, 2011 8:23 pm

There probably will be used copies, there are usually like 10 used copies after a new game is release. I think gamestop buys the games, and just sells them as used.
User avatar
Dean
 
Posts: 3438
Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 4:58 pm

Post » Sun Mar 06, 2011 6:26 pm

Yeah, I know about that. Most should be fixed when I get it.

If your only beef with 3 was that it wasn't quite like 1 or 2, then you should like NV. Obsidian isn't as good with open world games/exploration as Beth though. Still its a great game, better than your other two choices in current RPGs; Gothic 4 and Fable 3.
User avatar
A Boy called Marilyn
 
Posts: 3391
Joined: Sat May 26, 2007 7:17 am

Post » Sun Mar 06, 2011 7:03 pm

Fable 3 - Action RPG, not a true RPG, short but good. Gothic 4 - Worst RPG I have played.
User avatar
Crystal Birch
 
Posts: 3416
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 3:34 pm

Post » Sun Mar 06, 2011 9:43 pm

I scoff at people who say that New Vegas is nothing but a glorified FO3 expansion. But the more I think about it they do have a point. This game is very similiar in a lot of ways. The gameplay itself is mostly the same and the Oblivion with guns feel that I can't shake is still there (thanks to the engine) not exactly a bad thing but I digress.
For me personally the things they kept the same are largely if it ain't broken. And what they did change is nothing but improvements IMHO.
Take it from someone who found FO3's story lacking this one is much better.
As for the length I think I'm already doubled my playtime on this from FO3 and I'm just exploring mostly. Sidequests all over the place and things to do everywhere you go. New Vegas beats FO3 to the curb and laughs in its face.
We can only wish for expansions this great.
User avatar
Nicole Elocin
 
Posts: 3390
Joined: Sun Apr 15, 2007 9:12 am

Post » Sun Mar 06, 2011 5:34 pm

Fable 3 - Action RPG, not a true RPG, short but good. Gothic 4 - Worst RPG I have played.

Agree about Fable, but Gothic wasnt as bad as Two Worlds or Risen.
User avatar
Britta Gronkowski
 
Posts: 3475
Joined: Mon Apr 09, 2007 3:14 pm

Post » Sun Mar 06, 2011 10:47 pm

Agree about Fable, but Gothic wasnt as bad as Two Worlds or Risen.


Have to disagree here, Risen was most definitely better than Gothic 4 (or Two Worlds or any Fable for that matter). :laugh:
User avatar
Matthew Barrows
 
Posts: 3388
Joined: Thu Jun 28, 2007 11:24 pm

Post » Sun Mar 06, 2011 11:49 am

Have to disagree here, Risen was most definitely better than Gothic 4 or Two Worlds (or any Fable for that matter). :laugh:

Risen was unplayable on the 360, the X axis was too sensative and you couldnt change it.
User avatar
Jonathan Egan
 
Posts: 3432
Joined: Fri Jun 22, 2007 3:27 pm

Post » Sun Mar 06, 2011 5:28 pm

Risen was unplayable on the 360, the X axis was too sensative and you couldnt change it.


Seems fine on my friends Xbox... Though I do agree that it is shoddy port in general.
User avatar
Dean
 
Posts: 3438
Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 4:58 pm

Post » Sun Mar 06, 2011 2:15 pm

Seems fine on my friends Xbox... Though I do agree that it is shoddy port in general.

You cant even turn without doing a 180. You actually get dizzy trying to move in that game. Divinity II > most of those Euro RPGs. That game was actually under rated.
User avatar
Cool Man Sam
 
Posts: 3392
Joined: Thu May 10, 2007 1:19 pm

Next

Return to Fallout: New Vegas