These forums -- which are ironically filled with people who've devoted many, many hours to playing skyrim -- are teeming with Todd Howard haters. Many complain that he's taken the game in a bad direction. But these dissenters rarely acknowledge the subjectivity of their claims; they seem to believe their perceived weaknesses are not simply matters of opinion. And given the widespread success of skyrim, you would think that they would give Todd Howard the benefit of the doubt -- that they might concede his management has resulted in a wildly successful product, even if they aren't particularly fond of it.
Long story short, T.H. has created a wildly successful game -- which, judging by sales figures, is not a matter of opinion -- and I think the skyrim dissenters should keep that in mind when drafting their complaints.
Yes, but you see, we are on the internet, sir. It would be
stolid to say the internet isn't full of the simple-minded -- my point being that when approaching a forum, a user should expect to encounter the imbecilic. I'm certainly not suggesting all internet users are idiotic, but there are those who are opinion-ridden with their biased arguments and irrelevant trivialities and such. Along those lines, the reoccurring banter "dude, like skyrim suks cuz, like, its generalized", becomes quiet anticipated and perturbing, too. Welcome to the clash of the anti-transcendentalists.