» Tue May 17, 2011 1:59 pm
I'm getting the feeling that most of these guys who keep complaining about that dlc "is too short" probably didn't check the caves or the lookouts or actually explored the park. It's a beautiful park and I am liking what I am seeing so far. I do wish there were more weapons and that the map was generally bigger, but I'm still impressed. The dlc is easily bigger than the Pitt, Operation Anchorage, and Mothership Fetus. I will admit that I really liked Dead Money, although it did have some annoying parts, Broken Steel (because the last quest was awesome) and Point Lookout. So far, I think the DLC is better than Dead Money, but then again both DLCs are completely different and I'm sure those of you who have actually played both add-ons would agree with me. And to those of you who feel the story is "rushed" or that it svcks, I must say that two of the Fallout 3 DLC completely lacked a story, the Pitt and Point Lookout's stories were both short and lacking, and to be honest I didn't really see a great story in Fallout 3 in general. The story in Fallout 3 wasn't all that impressive, considering it basically revolved around you and Project Purity and I didn't find spending half of the game at Jefferson Memorial to be all that great. What I'm saying is, if you feel Honest Hearts' story is lacking or "rushed", then you should contend that it sure beats the hell out of Fallout 3. The usual flamers will probably still come on here and whine that they [censored] up and did the dlc in "thirty minutes", which all I can say to them is don't [censored] it again. It appears (in my opinion) that the flamers or "critics" of the dlc on this forum are few and the reason we keep seeing these rant threads is because that small group of people keep on posting on new threads. I have come to expect this on every forum nowadays, because the haters of any game feel the need to come onto the forums to blast the game and complain and all that [censored]. Sigh D;