So far, the resistance has won the war for the ark two weeks in a row. Is this because they controlled more areas, or because they acquired more victories as a whole? Personally, I think it should be based on areas controlled and if it is, this should be made a little more clear. For example, if the Resistance had a 100% victory rate for container city, but security had a 51% victory rate for everywhere else, security would win despite them having less victories overall because they controlled most of the ark. I think that this would give people more incentive to play brink so they could give their two cents daily to take control of highly-contested areas such as the resort.

Honestly there is little that can give people more incentive to play Brink. If you like it thats good for you but it has been a less than successful title.

its easier to defend most of the maps that's why the resistance wins so much the via sa via the whole

resistance defends half of the maps.

Plus more people play Resistance.

The only thing that makes sense. No way would Resistance win more than Security on Reactor, for example, if it were 8v8 humans.