[SPOILER] well, i read in one of the books that the forsworn sign a deal with a witch that gave them more power to defeat an army, that's why the briarhearts are stronger and have a briar heart, also that's why you always see them with hagravens.
Need to close that spoiler tag there brother.
Well, here's the thing. The Forsworn probably pushed somebody out of that land too. Some ancient group of elves, somebody. Not many people on either Nirn or Earth can say they're the first people to live on that stretch of land, and not many people can be said to be the
second people living there either, after having pushed out the first. I wonder if some people are mentally comparing the Forsworn to American Indians, with Nords being equivalent to the European settlers - hence the "white guilt" reference I made in another thread about this thread.
But the only way you can look at the history of North American colonization in that way is if you lump together American Indians as one group, so that the story is "American Indians came across a land bridge and lived peacefully until white people showed up and booted them off their land". That doesn't at all make sense given that the ancestors of Native Americans came from Asia over a very long period of time, with later groups certainly displacing earlier ones - so it certainly makes it illogical to adopt the "American Indians = original people, European Settlers = displacing latecomers" division. If a given group of American Indians were descended from people who came over in, for example, a third or fourth wave of migration, how are they "invadees" while European settlers are "invaders", given that the proto-Amerindians of the fourth wave certainly invaded those of the third wave, who displaced those of the second wave, who pushed out those from the first wave, who were the only people who could claim to have found a truly unoccupied land?
Similarly, in Tamriel, yeah, maybe the Nords simply showed up and pushed out the Reachmen. That might well be, although I don't think that there's much to be justly done about it given that it probably happened a thousand years ago. But even still, the Forsworn can't claim any sort of superiority, because unless they're descended from
the very first settlers of the area who settled a totally unoccupied land then they obviously pushed out whoever was there before them too.
So anybody defending the Forsworn in their fight against the Nords is just not thinking the history through completely. That's even before we get into the question of their using human sacrifice as part of their religion. Cortez was probably a bit of a dirty SOB, but at least he wasn't ripping out the still-beating hearts of thousands of war-captives, you know?