Its not anyone else's fault but yours, the message was clear.

I don't understand why people can't just postpone beating the game untill there done with the character seems to like this would solve all this pointless debate.

This.



This.

And.... this.

If you're dumb enough to not read the giant popup and make a seperate save, and then lower that even further by complaining and blaming it on Bethesda... you really don't have any right to complain when it clearly states that you should make a seperate save file.

Stop blaming other people for your own mistakes OP. Does nothing but make you look like an ass hat.

has nothing to do with blame, i just dont think a game with soooo many possible paths and choices should end with one mission,
it a ROLE PLAYING GAME, so let the player continue the role. also as i stated earlier, they should make a patch as an "optional download"
to allow u to continue. if ur one of these crybabies who like the way the game ends...THEN DONT DOWNLOAD IT!

Guys guys stop flaming the OP I think he gets it by now well I hope,but why only two saves?

RPG ends too, Fallout 3 have the unfortunate destiny of not doing it

its exactly that reason why they wont continue it. To continue you need to have a difinitive ending for all endings. FO3 only had a game extender beccause you had 2 possible endings. This is easy to create because both leads to the same area, just in one theres one less character. For FNV, you have 4 possible endings, each of which, impacting and changing the Mojave Wasteland in different ways depending on what faction quests you did and didn't do. It's fairly hard to take all that, for all 4 different endings, and make it all converge into one point.

The game ends with 'one mission', as you put it, because that mission marks the end of the Courier's story. What that story is depends on the role you picked for the Courier, so if you don't want that role to end yet, don't finish the game.

By the way, allowing post-MQ play would actually invalidate the role you're so attached to, because it would cease to have any meaning as you would never see the effects of all the decisions you made.





Sidenote: Am I the only one who sees the irony in being called a 'crybaby', because I like that the story ends, by someone who's wailing about that?

This is what I find most hilarious about threads like these.

Yes, I noticed that too

God Knowledge.

Well Quelle [censored] Surprise.

Yep everyone is right... There was a warning before that final mission. After saving 84 game saves thru out the game, because of the freezes and hang ups, i made it to the end because i saved the game often.
After i beat the game i deleted all the saves up to the final mission. I finished the last DLC by backing up to an earlier game save. Now i don't have them. My f up i guess! BUT...

Tell me another game that requires you to back up with an earlier game save in order to play DLC??? One that if you beat the game you can't EVER use DLC without losing progress that you made in the game
already? Fallout 3 before they fixed that!

Laugh all you want its ok... But think about that for a minute... A pop up box that says hey you cant return once you enter this point... Really i cant leave hoover dam, OK. Maybe it should have said, for the idiots like
me, who shouldn't be playing an RPG, Hey dip [censored] if you go past this point you cant use any DLC and you get to start from scratch. An assumption was made that they learned from fall out 3 that after you beat the game
you can still roam the map.

I am not going to start a flaming war with you guys, it's just a simple and obvious flaw. If the majority here thinks its OK that you have to back track to play DLC then that's good enough for me.

I'll just dump a game save onto the xbox from my computer... easy fix.

There's nothing to think about. The majority of people here read the announcement of no Breaking Steel like DLC, so it was expected.

dm will prob be very hard for him tho.

legates camp is def too late. i think you can still back out of the hoover dam quest. i'm not sure tho, it's been a while since i was at that point of the game. also you should have atleast 5 or 6 save files while playing any rpg, especially fallout (or elder scrolls), if not atleast for bugs and glitches, but i'm guessing you "get that" now. also, i think the game creates an auto-save right before it's too late to go back.

i think it's awesome fo3 didn't end. well, it did end, but then continued.

It's too bad Obsidian didn't force a save right before you clicked yes. I think a majority of these threads wouldn't have occurred if they had just made New Vegas make an extra save.

I say quit trying to save people from their own stupidity. It never works.

Ahahahaha, another one xD

Interstingly, though, it looks like they may have intended to do it originally: there's a script called "VMQEndStatesQuestScript", with the following Comment in it:

(My Bold)

These seem to suggest the intention of disabling certain features, and enabling others to reflect changes in the world.

Presumably they realised what a huge job it would actually be, and scrapped it-- still, it could make an interesting Mod project for someone with a lot of time...

Be cool if they made it like diablo were when u beat the game u start a new one on a harder difficulty but u keep all ur stuff I think that would be cool

Really........... Even I have made a few characters, and I hate multiple endings. 4 endings= 0 real endings.

OP Bethesda did not make fo nv Obsidian did. As others have said the giant pop up that says "point of no return" in it should have been more that a hint. What are you doing with only 2 saves so close together in a game you say yourself is full of bugs and glitches?

I m sorry I just don t feel bad for you op.

I only use two saves myself but I have never had any glitches, or at least any serious annoyin issues, but yeah u paid the $10 mine as well start a new game honest hearts is really pretty ease at a lower leave I went in at lvl 13 and am having no trouble plus there's alot of cool loot and xp their

Thats pretty weak if you are having no trouble at level 13.

I keep getting a bad feeling about HH. Its saying too, short too easy.

Like The Pitt................. I hope I m wrong.