Empeor 3lit3 R4Mbo.

Post » Mon May 14, 2012 10:18 am

Yes I was, but I'm not saying that wont happen. Personally, I'll look for the PvP-RP server and hope for name restrictions. As far as lore goes, any Emperor's of this time are more likely to be considered ambitious warlords in comparison to the actual Emperors, especially since though they may hold the Imperial City, they don't control Tamriel like many of the other Emperor's did. its kind of like, Emperor lost its meaning during this time in history. Its still of importance, just not that much.
During some time the Roman empire run trough emperors in an alarming rate, average lifespan was a couple of years.
After the empire fell lots of people called themselves the emperor of Rome, without having any connections, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Holy_Roman_Empire was commonly described as neither Roman, holly or an empire.

As you say, its an bragging right for the warlord who hold the capital that day. Later historians quietly ignored them.
User avatar
Ricky Meehan
 
Posts: 3364
Joined: Wed Jun 27, 2007 5:42 pm

Post » Mon May 14, 2012 10:59 pm

You know moderating the names players can take is perfectly feasible. LOTRO already does this by moderators having the power to change character names that don't fit into the guidelines of character naming (which is no xxSepirothGokuxx names or taking the name of major NPCs or lore characters).

That's such a stupid design decision.
User avatar
Scared humanity
 
Posts: 3470
Joined: Tue Oct 16, 2007 3:41 am

Post » Mon May 14, 2012 1:22 pm

Pretty sure the GI article said it's the equivalent of a title for being highest on the scoreboards in PvP.
It's not as if that person actually becomes the emperor.
User avatar
Prue
 
Posts: 3425
Joined: Sun Feb 11, 2007 4:27 am

Post » Mon May 14, 2012 7:33 am

I think this is the stupidest thing I read on the scans....
Great way to ruin the lore... so .. in the second era the Emperor of all Tamriel was "GOKU SSJ4 the 1337"

great .. just great...

Yeah, someone, somewhere REALLY dropped the ball with all this.
User avatar
John Moore
 
Posts: 3294
Joined: Sun Jun 10, 2007 8:18 am

Post » Mon May 14, 2012 5:07 pm

Pretty sure the GI article said it's the equivalent of a title for being highest on the scoreboards in PvP.
It's not as if that person actually becomes the emperor.

Which is kinda sad.

In the awesome MMO "A Tale in the Desert", one player - and only one player - can become the Pharao of the whole Egypt. And he then really is a ruler with wide-ranging powers. Among other things, he can permanently ban other players (well, until the next "cycle" at least, which last a real-time year or two). However, he can only do so a few times ... so the social pressures on how and when to utilise his powers are staggering. After all, what if a friend of the banned player manages to be the next Pharao?
User avatar
April D. F
 
Posts: 3346
Joined: Wed Mar 21, 2007 8:41 pm

Post » Mon May 14, 2012 1:37 pm

Which is kinda sad.

In the awesome MMO "A Tale in the Desert", one player - and only one player - can become the Pharao of the whole Egypt. And he then really is a ruler with wide-ranging powers. Among other things, he can permanently ban other players (well, until the next "cycle" at least, which last a real-time year or two). However, he can only do so a few times ... so the social pressures on how and when to utilise his powers are staggering. After all, what if a friend of the banned player manages to be the next Pharao?

that such a terribly designed abuse of power position.
User avatar
Dragonz Dancer
 
Posts: 3441
Joined: Sat Jun 24, 2006 11:01 am

Post » Mon May 14, 2012 7:58 am



that such a terribly designed abuse of power position.

For a "terribly designed abuse" it works very, very well - since 2003. http://www.atitd.com/, the first 24 hours are free, so you can use it to chat with other players about how well it works (or doesn't work) from their perspective.

Interesting side note: You seem to enjoy posting your ideas and assumptions as if they were true, without having any background knowledge of the topic in question and being quite often provably wrong. :)
User avatar
dav
 
Posts: 3338
Joined: Mon Jul 30, 2007 3:46 pm

Post » Mon May 14, 2012 12:44 pm

Interesting side note: You seem to enjoy posting your ideas and assumptions as if they were true, without having any background knowledge of the topic in question and being quite often provably wrong. :smile:
Interesting main note: you seem to make assumptions based off of what I say with having no knowledge of my intent, or meaning, behind saying them, and often make clearly wrong assumptions based off that.

See that works both ways, and is a silly thing to say.

Also just because the game hasn't destroyed itself doesn't mean its good gameplay.
User avatar
matt
 
Posts: 3267
Joined: Wed May 30, 2007 10:17 am

Post » Mon May 14, 2012 3:59 pm

Interesting main note: you seem to make assuptons based off of what I saw with having no knowledge of my intent behind saying them.

No, I just judge your MMO background by the lack of knowledge of how MMOs work you display in the threads. Which of the more innovative MMOs of their time - Lost Souls, Genesis, Threshold, Neverwinter Nights, Meridian 59, Ultima Online, A Tale in the Desert, Star Wars Galaxies, Lineage and so on - you played or not doesn't really matter.

also just because the game hasn't destroyed itself doesn't mean its good gameplay.

The game mechanics do exactly what they are supposed to do: Simulate the power struggle and politics of the Ancient Egypt. In this sense, they are well-designed and work well. The game also makes a steady profit for the developers. In this sense, they fit and work in the context of the whole game. And here comes you, and claims it isn't "good gameplay" ... without giving any arguments or reasons whatsoever.
User avatar
ONLY ME!!!!
 
Posts: 3479
Joined: Tue Aug 28, 2007 12:16 pm

Post » Mon May 14, 2012 10:13 am

Snip
Well I actually do know how MMOs work, all the things I have ragged on, such as player housing, have failed in very obvious ways.

Which could be simulated without having the ability to ban people. Any game designer who thinks such an abuse of power is warranted has a screw loose. Might as well give him the console and allow him to turn on god mode.
User avatar
Paula Ramos
 
Posts: 3384
Joined: Sun Jul 16, 2006 5:43 am

Post » Mon May 14, 2012 10:05 pm

EDIT for EDIT:

Well I actually do know how MMOs work, all the things I have ragged on, such as player housing, have failed in very obvious ways.

Did it fail? Ultima Online is still around. Star Wars Galaxies would be still around if their licence didn't run out. Minecraft (which is almost all about making your own constructions in a shared world, as far as the multiplayer goes) does great.

Where are those "failures" you're talking about?

Which could be simulated without having the ability to ban people. Any game designer who thinks such an abuse of power is warranted has a screw loose.

Of course it could be implemented differently. But just because there's more than one way to do something doesn't make one of the ways to be "bad gameplay", so that's not an argument in favour of your original statement. :)

As for the "screw lose" comment: Are you seriously resorting to ad hominem attacks on someone who can't even defend themselves, not participating in this discussion?
User avatar
N3T4
 
Posts: 3428
Joined: Wed Aug 08, 2007 8:36 pm

Post » Mon May 14, 2012 9:09 pm

Of course it could. But just because there's more than one way to do something doesn't make one of the ways to be "bad gameplay", so that's not an argument in favour of your original statement. :smile:
It makes it bad gameplay when it allows people to abuse power.

But from what I gather from your other posts balance and fairness are not things you seem to care about in games, "those who get there first should be able to claim it forever as long as they can fight for it", or so was your stance on housing.

snip
You mean like how Ultima online's housing situation failed miserably?

Also minescraft in a sandbox game, not a MMO, it is irrelevant. you might as well start bringing up Halo.
User avatar
Emily abigail Villarreal
 
Posts: 3433
Joined: Mon Aug 27, 2007 9:38 am

Post » Mon May 14, 2012 12:41 pm

It makes it bad gameplay when it allows people to abuse power.

It allows people to abuse power if they are ready to face the consequences ... How is that "bad gameplay"?

But from what I gather from your other posts balance and fairness are not things you seem to care about in games, "those who get there first should be able to claim it forever as long as they can fight for it", or so was your stance on housing.

Cite me where I claimed that, expecially the "forever" part. :)
User avatar
Vera Maslar
 
Posts: 3468
Joined: Wed Sep 27, 2006 2:32 pm

Post » Tue May 15, 2012 12:00 am

It allows people to abuse power if they are ready to face the consequences ... How is that "bad gameplay"?
People are also ready to face the bugginess and CTDs of Bethesda's games, does that make it good game design? no.

Cite me where I claimed that, expecially the "forever" part. :smile:
If you are going to totally ignore the entire conversation we had on housing then I see no reason to further this discussion.
User avatar
Dina Boudreau
 
Posts: 3410
Joined: Thu Jan 04, 2007 10:59 pm

Post » Mon May 14, 2012 4:30 pm

People are also ready to face the bugginess and CTDs of Bethesda's games, does that make it good game design? no.

The question I asked was "How are having meaningful choices and consequences bad game design?" That's not an answer to this question.

If you are going to totally ignore the entire conversation we had on housing then I see no reason to further this discussion.

Hey, you are the one who misrepresented my position. Why are you getting mad when I called you out on your strawman building? :D
User avatar
Gill Mackin
 
Posts: 3384
Joined: Sat Dec 16, 2006 9:58 pm

Post » Mon May 14, 2012 5:39 pm

emporer 3lit3 R4Mbo will die by my hand. the throne shall be mine.
User avatar
Mizz.Jayy
 
Posts: 3483
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 5:56 pm

Post » Mon May 14, 2012 1:50 pm

For the Emperor title, I hope that the Battle for the Imperial City PvP map takes a week to reset. It would seem silly if the Person holding the title had to give it up the next day or in an hour. Other than that, I think it's nice way of pointing out the best PvP player in a faction, by giving them a title which shows the effort they've put in.
User avatar
Sarah Kim
 
Posts: 3407
Joined: Tue Aug 29, 2006 2:24 pm

Post » Mon May 14, 2012 8:08 am

emporer 3lit3 R4Mbo will die by my hand. the throne shall be mine.
good luck. The blades are sworn to protect him with their lives... Over an 11 year old apparently.
User avatar
!beef
 
Posts: 3497
Joined: Wed Aug 16, 2006 4:41 pm

Post » Mon May 14, 2012 8:01 am

Merry eyesore the elk aka MK will be emperor of tamriel. Denied the right he was to leave his mark on the world, he shall find a way. Tam! Rugh!

We of the Selective draw breath to put the Eyesore on the throne of the Red Diamond kingdom! TAM! RUGH!
User avatar
benjamin corsini
 
Posts: 3411
Joined: Tue Jul 31, 2007 11:32 pm

Post » Mon May 14, 2012 10:06 am

You get assassinated by the DB. Thus giving someone else a turn to play emperor.
User avatar
Yama Pi
 
Posts: 3384
Joined: Wed Apr 18, 2007 3:51 am

Post » Mon May 14, 2012 11:14 pm

I won't be playing verses mode in this game so I doubt I'll ever be empress and frankly I would not want to be. I can't stand competitive people
User avatar
Joanne Crump
 
Posts: 3457
Joined: Sat Jul 22, 2006 9:44 am

Post » Mon May 14, 2012 11:06 pm

Which is kinda sad.

In the awesome MMO "A Tale in the Desert", one player - and only one player - can become the Pharao of the whole Egypt. And he then really is a ruler with wide-ranging powers. Among other things, he can permanently ban other players (well, until the next "cycle" at least, which last a real-time year or two). However, he can only do so a few times ... so the social pressures on how and when to utilise his powers are staggering. After all, what if a friend of the banned player manages to be the next Pharao?

Wow. That is pretty extraordinary.

Though I never said I didn't think TESO's emperor title thing wasn't a silly idea, I was just saying it didn't create a carved in stone leader of the country.
User avatar
Matt Fletcher
 
Posts: 3355
Joined: Mon Sep 24, 2007 3:48 am

Post » Mon May 14, 2012 10:55 am

emperor N00BcrUsher shall rule them all :P
User avatar
casey macmillan
 
Posts: 3474
Joined: Fri Feb 09, 2007 7:37 pm

Post » Mon May 14, 2012 6:05 pm


good luck. The blades are sworn to protect him with their lives... Over an 11 year old apparently.
he wont have time to form any Blades.
User avatar
alicia hillier
 
Posts: 3387
Joined: Tue Feb 06, 2007 2:57 am

Post » Mon May 14, 2012 8:07 am

he wont have time to form any Blades.
Just call 47. He'll do the job.
User avatar
LuCY sCoTT
 
Posts: 3410
Joined: Sun Feb 04, 2007 8:29 am

PreviousNext

Return to Othor Games