Now, with my opinion out of the way, what do you guys think?
Niether, I want Dishonored to be like the LGS classics. But you havent played them so.....
Fallout NV- Much better than skyrim. Fallout 3 was good but with NV they actually expanded on the gameplay, making it much better.
But not only that but it has better quests, NPCs, dungeons ect. + I also prefer guns over melee.
But yeah If Beth stopped trying to make TES so big and made it the same size as FO:NV then they could focus on making all the content in the game have better quality.
I already ranted about this before though so ill leave it.
Bethesda are still awesome though, I dont wanna sound like im hating, just as a hardcoe gamer I dont agree with *some* of their decisions.
Casuals are loving it though, they are having a ball, and thats exactly what Beth wanted $$$$
However its the damn graphics fault! I wonder how many millions it cost Beth to develop and publish skyrim, they just was not prepared to cater to a dedicated gamer like me (although a hardcoe mode would have been nice) and also they obviously spent way too much time, effort and money on the graphics that they did not have enough left to make everything else as perfect as the graphics. That game is beautiful, but it is whats on the inside that counts bethesda!!!
graphics has been the cause for loads of issues- dumbing down, day1 DLC, no demos, little innovation ect. Games cost way too much to develop now so they have to appeal to a wider audience aka target casuals and the like.
Correct me if I am wrong.
Anyway I fear for Dishonored a little bit for those reasons, the game could be another Bioshock? But that is exactly what 70% of the audience wants. Grr they dont know what they are missing play System Shock 2 you fools!