You know that the only reason any of that is on the console is pure amount of players playing on consoles compared to PC. And I don't see how is price money related to it being a good competitive platform.

It's like COD, a rehashed garbage/full of bugs/booring gameplay that cost 4mil to make, and they invest 100millions in promoting it and that's why it is the most successful shooter out there even though it's garbage. Brink will not survive long as soon as battlefield 3 and cod:mw3 comes out brink will be dead 95% sure.


"An online shooter needs variety, depth, and addictiveness to succeed over the long term. Brink might find a niche with some hardcoe fans, but it isn’t for everyone. I'd love to see more of the parkour gameplay, but one mechanic isn't enough to carry an entire game. Brink has heart, but the overall package is lacking."
I wish Brink all the best, but I don't see it succeeding unless they do some major changes and we all know that major changes in the game industry don't happen

Throw a grenade to knock them all down or stop being a deep player and use the smart system to toe advantage. Iv played 2 hours last night and already found myself in a situation like that twice, and prevailed.

Personally I can't stand Normal Core in any CoD game or BFBC2.. I cant stand it when a few well placed shots fail to kill. I actually think it balances the game. It makes all weapons a threat in thier designed rolls. I hate it when it takes a magazine of ammo per kill. Leaves you screwed if you are 1 v 2 or more.

That said I think brink is a good mix, its not a realism shooter, but people die when you shoot them... I love how most of the guns feel...