3 Human Races

Post » Tue May 15, 2012 12:37 am



So they are just religiously Jewish correct?
Yes. I'll bet my life that a Jewish man of Negroid descent probably isn't of direct lineage.
Which is why, once again, Khazars or whatever you want to call them are uncommon.
Interestingly though, our new cantor is a Caucasoid Italian convert, so he isn't "Khazarian" but he could be considered it, even though he is a first-gen convert.
Of course, I could very well NOT be of direct descent, but I'm fairly certain my family has been Jewish for at least 2000 years.
User avatar
Justin Bywater
 
Posts: 3264
Joined: Tue Sep 11, 2007 10:44 pm

Post » Mon May 14, 2012 11:19 pm

As other people have pointed out these definitions are not accurate or upto date.

People from India are Caucasian. Australian aboriginals fit into none of the above three groups. Pacific islanders are originally from Asia.

All People are from one single group or two if the Neanderthal interbreeding theory turns out to be true so the best description would be a scientific one.

What about people like me who are a mixture of different people and therefore either do not fit into any of these groups or fit into all of them?

If you need to describe someone some reason maybe the best way would be with paint sample cards.
Something like " the guy who ran off was a blend of tropical beach and white stipple 15"

User avatar
Michelle Smith
 
Posts: 3417
Joined: Wed Nov 15, 2006 2:03 am

Post » Tue May 15, 2012 11:08 am

As long as no one is Red 40 Lake or Yellow 5.
User avatar
Setal Vara
 
Posts: 3390
Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 1:24 pm

Post » Tue May 15, 2012 12:45 pm

As other people have pointed out these definitions are not accurate or upto date.

People from India are Caucasian. Australian aboriginals fit into none of the above three groups. Pacific islanders are originally from Asia.

All People are from one single group or two if the Neanderthal interbreeding theory turns out to be true so the best description would be a scientific one.

What about people like me who are a mixture of different people and therefore either do not fit into any of these groups or fit into all of them?

If you need to describe someone some reason maybe the best way would be with paint sample cards.
Something like " the guy who ran off was a blend of tropical beach and white stipple 15"
Haha :)
That Neanderthal theory is interesting... But wouldn't that be like a wolf mating with a beagle?

Wait... can that happen?
User avatar
Monika Krzyzak
 
Posts: 3471
Joined: Fri Oct 13, 2006 11:29 pm

Post » Mon May 14, 2012 9:11 pm

There's no such thing as "mongoloid" or "negroid", there's just one species, Homo sapiens.
There are also no such things as dobermans, labradors, rottweilers, bordor collies, etc.
Just dogs.

This is likely to get locked anyway, but while on the topic of race.

Why do Asians/mongoloids have different eyes ?

I never understood it. You have darker skin in sunny areas to protect yourself from the sun, it isnt needed in less suny areas.
But what purpose do their eyes serve ? Never understood it.
User avatar
no_excuse
 
Posts: 3380
Joined: Sun Jul 16, 2006 3:56 am

Post » Tue May 15, 2012 9:10 am

There are also no such things as dobermans, labradors, rottweilers, bordor collies, etc.
Just dogs.
Nice ;)

So could a wolf really [censored] a beagle?

Update: yes.
User avatar
Portions
 
Posts: 3499
Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2007 1:47 am

Post » Tue May 15, 2012 2:44 am

THIS THREAD SHALL BE HANDLED MATURELY!

Negroid, Caucasoid, and Mongoloid...

So shouldn't Blacks be called Negros or Negroin, and Asians be called Mongolian?

I know those who inhabit Mongolia are Mongolian, and that Negro is an outdated term, but science suggests these are indeed correct. Besides, I don't like calling someone black or white or even red or yellow; people are all shades of color.

Race does not exist in science.
User avatar
Ross Zombie
 
Posts: 3328
Joined: Wed Jul 11, 2007 5:40 pm

Post » Tue May 15, 2012 12:24 am

Race does not exist in science.

As of post WW2.
User avatar
Amy Cooper
 
Posts: 3400
Joined: Thu Feb 01, 2007 2:38 am

Post » Tue May 15, 2012 7:29 am

Something interesting...
You know Cro-Magnon? Well it is the newest homo sapien species (extinct now). If the Neanderthal theory is true, then maybe Cro-Magnon interbred with the stronger H. Sapien Sapiens and merged with them, as H. Neanderthalensis may have as well?

Because that might have had a strong impact on the development of the Negroids, Caucasoids, and Mongoloids.
User avatar
Laura Shipley
 
Posts: 3564
Joined: Thu Oct 26, 2006 4:47 am

Post » Tue May 15, 2012 12:10 pm

As of post WW2.
yes, because it would be rather pointless to refer to obsolete science and claim it as fact, wouldn't it?
User avatar
Damien Mulvenna
 
Posts: 3498
Joined: Wed Jun 27, 2007 3:33 pm

Post » Tue May 15, 2012 9:23 am

yes, because it would be rather pointless to refer to obsolete science and claim it as fact, wouldn't it?

Depending upon why it's obsolete.
User avatar
Robert Devlin
 
Posts: 3521
Joined: Mon Jul 23, 2007 2:19 pm

Post » Mon May 14, 2012 10:31 pm

Closed for review.
User avatar
Louise
 
Posts: 3407
Joined: Wed Nov 01, 2006 1:06 pm

Post » Tue May 15, 2012 4:22 am

Or, people can just handle being called black and white. Because that is just their descriptive term, no need to take it as a racist insult.
User avatar
Elizabeth Lysons
 
Posts: 3474
Joined: Fri Feb 02, 2007 7:16 am

Previous

Return to Othor Games