Humans Worse for Environment than Nuclear Waste

Post » Wed Dec 04, 2013 7:08 am

Or be with someone of the same gender as ye'self?

Or just don't be a crazy *** freak?

User avatar
Mylizards Dot com
 
Posts: 3379
Joined: Fri May 04, 2007 1:59 pm

Post » Wed Dec 04, 2013 11:16 am

Humans are one of the best species in my opinion, along with the Beaver.

This thread makes me want to play Stalker: Call of Pripyat very good game.

User avatar
MR.BIGG
 
Posts: 3373
Joined: Sat Sep 08, 2007 7:51 am

Post » Wed Dec 04, 2013 9:35 am

Uhh.... duh. Thank you Captain Obvious. We would be totally confused without you being here to tell us that "save the planet" should really be "reverse our culture of wanton and negligent consumerism resulting in an accelerating negative impact on the environment that we depend upon to survive". But hey, since the slogan is wrong we might as well pollute ourselves into extinction, eh smart guy?

This is an internet forum for games. Are you really worried about a large portion of the people here successfully procreating? :P

User avatar
Dagan Wilkin
 
Posts: 3352
Joined: Fri Apr 27, 2007 4:20 am

Post » Wed Dec 04, 2013 6:12 am

we can only hope.

on topic. there are more people than radioactive waste, so yes that is true.

User avatar
Tarka
 
Posts: 3430
Joined: Sun Jun 10, 2007 9:22 pm

Post » Wed Dec 04, 2013 10:40 am

I laughed much harder than I should have. You don't often make me laugh Frodo, but when you do, I crap my pants.

In any case, a human caused problem not being quite as bad as humans are as a collective whole, especially when you include human caused problems, is somehow surprising? I am extremely confused.
User avatar
Yvonne
 
Posts: 3577
Joined: Sat Sep 23, 2006 3:05 am

Post » Wed Dec 04, 2013 5:15 am

I'm flattered.

User avatar
Connor Wing
 
Posts: 3465
Joined: Wed Jun 20, 2007 1:22 am

Post » Wed Dec 04, 2013 6:42 am

Well thank god, I was worrying you would take offense for a second!
User avatar
SWagg KId
 
Posts: 3488
Joined: Sat Nov 17, 2007 8:26 am

Post » Wed Dec 04, 2013 11:21 am

Laughter

This place is a hell hole and I'm not sure I want to be around to watch it get worse.

So much optimism. You're welcome.

:bunny:

User avatar
Julie Ann
 
Posts: 3383
Joined: Thu Aug 23, 2007 5:17 am

Post » Wed Dec 04, 2013 4:02 am

Nuclear waste is worse for me than people.

User avatar
lolly13
 
Posts: 3349
Joined: Tue Jul 25, 2006 11:36 am

Post » Wed Dec 04, 2013 3:08 pm

could be relevant...

https://unitedcats.wordpress.com/2007/05/29/major-biological-discoveryinside-the-chernobyl-reactor

User avatar
Ana Torrecilla Cabeza
 
Posts: 3427
Joined: Wed Jun 28, 2006 6:15 pm

Post » Wed Dec 04, 2013 8:43 am

Right, radiation eating mushrooms. You just can't stop life :ohmy:
User avatar
Kat Lehmann
 
Posts: 3409
Joined: Tue Jun 27, 2006 6:24 am

Post » Wed Dec 04, 2013 5:53 am

Holy crap. Ghouls, man!

User avatar
Jade Barnes-Mackey
 
Posts: 3418
Joined: Thu Jul 13, 2006 7:29 am

Post » Wed Dec 04, 2013 4:02 pm

There's a theory that radiation is actually vital to life. There have been tests done where organisms are subjected to different levels of radiation. Natural, low-level radiation, or even radiation slightly above the norm, produced the best results. Where researchers reduced the radiation to less-than-natural levels, the organisms' immune system suffered.

Radiation isn't this ooga-booga! thing it's been made out to be. It's not even cumulative (at low levels, at least, for sure), as has previously been supposed. A little bit seems to be good for you.

User avatar
Ryan Lutz
 
Posts: 3465
Joined: Sun Sep 09, 2007 12:39 pm

Post » Wed Dec 04, 2013 10:42 am

Just covering my bases.

Also, sunlight is radiation.

User avatar
Jesus Sanchez
 
Posts: 3455
Joined: Sun Oct 21, 2007 11:15 am

Post » Wed Dec 04, 2013 3:02 pm


Nobody is better, it's called civilisation. If you'd rather live in some incredibly regulated society where there are severe restrictions on gathering resources and what can be used and so-forth go ahead. Never bought into any of this "humans are the real monsters" crap before and certainly won't now, resources need to be gathered and cities built; it's what life is about.
User avatar
Jessica Phoenix
 
Posts: 3420
Joined: Sat Jun 24, 2006 8:49 am

Post » Wed Dec 04, 2013 10:00 am

Nature is wonderfully resilient, and that goes for resilience against human encroachment, too. I have no patience for misanthropic sentimentalism. The human population is thriving due to stable food supply and medical advances, and thank god for that. As is the way of things, it will probably reverse someday, then all the environmentalists can rejoice as people die around them.
User avatar
James Rhead
 
Posts: 3474
Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2007 7:32 am

Post » Wed Dec 04, 2013 8:33 am

The answer isn't 42? Are you sure?

User avatar
Elisha KIng
 
Posts: 3285
Joined: Sat Aug 18, 2007 12:18 am

Post » Wed Dec 04, 2013 8:16 am

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/comment/ambroseevans_pritchard/10479872/Dust-to-Dust-a-man-made-Malthusian-crisis.html

http://www.theherald.com.au/story/1848433/the-ocean-is-broken/

but in the end...

http://guymcpherson.com/2013/01/climate-change-summary-and-update/

User avatar
Ells
 
Posts: 3430
Joined: Thu Aug 10, 2006 9:03 pm

Post » Wed Dec 04, 2013 10:41 am

Ouch, that sounds painful :pinch: Can I just promise not to have any kids?

About the matter at hand... I said once that I would only consider it a true success for the human race if we last to the http://filer.case.edu/dts8/thelastq.htm. It sounds like that isn't happening, even if we did manage to settle in other planets before ruining our chances in this one, wouldn't we be exporting our failed models and methods to them? Wouldn't our basic instincts and biology just make us diverge into a myriad of tribes spread through the galaxy, hell bent on domination over each other, damning planet after planet until none remain?

I do not doubt there will be plenty of life on this planet long after we are gone, there have been many "crisis" through the Earth's history which dwarf our current one. The problem is that, as biology goes, when a species goes extinct, it's extinct forever. We are a fluke in evolution, maybe the only one ever, and it feels kinda disappointing if it turns out that our "superior intelligence" is ultimately detrimental to survival.

User avatar
Jaki Birch
 
Posts: 3379
Joined: Fri Jan 26, 2007 3:16 am

Post » Wed Dec 04, 2013 12:03 pm

If anyone wants to complain that this planet is going to hell - just remember what happened in the early 1900's. We had a viral epidemic kill half a million people in the United States. Organized mobs roamed American cities, dealing with the illicit liquor trade - they were far more violent than the drug gangs we see today. We had two world wars, and all the people that died in either of them. We had the Great Depression, and a comet hit Russia leveling hundreds of square miles of forests, in a region that was thankfully unpopulated at the time. Then of course we had the dust bowl - we lost huge tracts of agricultural lands to soil erosion, and the past fifty years has been devoted to replenishing that soil.

Now we're in the 2010's - so far we haven't seen any World Wars. Nobody has lobbed any nukes at another person so far. We've been afraid of viral epidemics, but the worst we've had to deal with is some [censored] parents not vaccinating their kids. Russia is now acting like an advocate for peace, pushing countries to give up their chemical weapons arsenal - really funny if you think about the second half of the last century. Population growth is grinding to a halt, and our big problem in the future is actually going to be people not having enough kids - yeah, Japan has a huge problem with population, in that it's not growing. It's starting to shrink, because people aren't having enough unprotected six. The same has been happening within the United States for over a decade, and we've only kept our numbers growing through immigration.

What we have to worry about now - is just not screwing up so bad that we all die. One thing we can always count on is human greed, and the people in charge of the U.S., Russia, and China wouldn't want to see all those pretty stores owned by wealthy campaign donors go down in a pile of radioactive smoke. China's more peaceful than it's ever been, because they depend on the rest of the world to keep their economy growing.

User avatar
Sabrina Steige
 
Posts: 3396
Joined: Mon Aug 20, 2007 9:51 pm

Post » Wed Dec 04, 2013 1:23 pm

Okay then, maybe we should live in a world were we're all on strictly controlled government-issue rations lest our selfish destructive nature in catching fish and growing crops to eat hurts the poor Earth.

User avatar
Nicole Elocin
 
Posts: 3390
Joined: Sun Apr 15, 2007 9:12 am

Post » Wed Dec 04, 2013 3:21 pm

That's not necessarily the case - we just need to produce food and materials in a more sustainable way. We used to make food dyes for children's candy by mixing heavy metals like lead, mercury, and chromium with other stuff - obviously a bad idea. We used to save money by having children work in factories and coal mines - obviously a bad idea. We used to harvest wood by clear-cutting entire forests - obviously a bad idea. That isn't to say that all regulations are good (there are some downright crappy ones out there), or that the government always has a place in every little issue.

We just need to get used to thinking a little more long term than we have been - it won't be as cheap (but then again, advlts cost more than children when it comes to coal mining), but it can be done, and I'm quite confident that we can maintain our quality of life in such a way that doesn't destroy our children's and grandchildren's future. We just have to be kind enough to think beyond ourselves and our immediate wants - long term thinking is important.

User avatar
Taylah Illies
 
Posts: 3369
Joined: Fri Feb 09, 2007 7:13 am

Post » Wed Dec 04, 2013 12:32 pm

http://www.theguardian.com/society/2004/jan/04/observerspecialbritainsschools.medicineandhealth health wise. WW2 rationing was hardly fun but it was a lot healthier than the over-processed crap we tend to eat nowadays.

User avatar
Umpyre Records
 
Posts: 3436
Joined: Tue Nov 13, 2007 4:19 pm

Post » Wed Dec 04, 2013 10:34 am

You mean Half-Life 2?

User avatar
Jason White
 
Posts: 3531
Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 12:54 pm

Post » Wed Dec 04, 2013 11:42 am


You mean like, if we managed to get human colonies out there in space, we would be doomed to fight galactic wars among each other as galactic human warlords all vie for control over huge sections of the galaxy?

But what of the Human Federation and stuff like that, like what we see in 'Star Trek' or 'Mass Effect'? None of that? Just us eternally battling each other out for control over space rocks and whatever raw goods they have?

And that is only if we don't completely ruin our chances here on Earth?
User avatar
Red Bevinz
 
Posts: 3318
Joined: Thu Sep 20, 2007 7:25 am

PreviousNext

Return to Othor Games