I mean no disrespect, but when you consider the fact that certain places in the world dogs have more rights then women, everything you just said goes out the window.
No, it doesn't. The few countries where women literally have fewer rights than men are behind the times in just about every other respect imaginable. Before technology reached a certain point in places like the U.S., it was just us and the wolves, and in such conditions, there's only one way for human beings to survive: by respecting the strengths and weaknesses inherent to men and women. Men work, women stay at home. That's how it is in undeveloped countries, because when you look at those countries, you're literally looking into the past. Not that I condone certain other norms in such countries. But you can't force progress onto people who don't want it.
Most feminist groups don't go to places like Egypt and put on their [censored] Walks and whatnot in order to promote gender equality. For the most part, they stick to places where they generally have little reason to fear being assaulted by jackasses who don't have any regard for the rights of anyone, let alone women. I don't necessarily blame them, as the thought of being [censored] hardly appeals to me, but they need to consider that by doing that, they're not reaching people who are behind the times, they're preaching to people who are already on their side. I'm tired of hearing about "[censored] culture". I'm tired of the false idea that only men commit [censored] that so many feminists operate under. I'm tired of being told that I need to respect women. Respect is EARNED. Period. I don't need to respect women in order to not contact them in an inappropriate or unlawful manner. It's called common decency. I have it, and so do a lot of men. We don't need to be treated like we're one step away from becoming depraved, neanderthal-ish rapist murderers. We don't deserve being called scumbags for hitting on drunk women at parties and bars. We're not trying to take advantage of anyone, we're trying to have six with the person we see as the most likely to accept our advances. If women know they're more likely to become that person while drunk, then it's their responsibility to not get drunk around men. Everyone is expected to not get behind the wheel while drunk, and we don't make excuses for them when they plow into someone's house with a BAC of .12, so why should women not be expected to accept the potential consequences of getting hammered around a bunch of dudes, who are usually also getting hammered?
Sorry, you probably understand and agree with most of what I said, I'm just sick of the prevailing attitude in American society today and couldn't help expressing that.
If you are wondering what you can do right now, stop using "guys" to refer to a group of people. It teaches children at a young age, that males are dominant. Not all of them, but some of them.
Nevermind, you're exactly the kind of person I'm sick of dealing with. Do you not realize how crazy that sounds? The use of "guys" in placement of "people" teaches that men are dominant? BS. It's just another habit that caught on, like people saying "My bad", or describing everything awesome as "epic". I go back and forth between using "guys" and "people" all the time. They're easily interchangeable because people simply got used to it. Have been for decades. Has nothing to do with any notion of dominance. Holy hell...