Oh yes! I noticed that, how weird.

before the last update, when you started the game and you had choose the race, all the name of the race were written in small (maybe lowercase?), after the update, many players nothig a change: the name "imperial" was written in Caps lock.

This is a good idea because we other European don't know if our bugs are the ones of the uk/us version or if they come from this problem of localization.

Thanks buddy.

futark, please add the "invisible hands" bug on the issue list...

è un bug poco comune da quanto ho capito, ma se serve a farlo notare agli sviluppatori... grazie

btw, we shouldnt forget the Kinect Dragonshouts bug aswell. That should be fixed with the next update!

Mi chiamo Odahviing e tu?

Messo.

También se ha encontrado un bug que ami personalmente me ha asustado bastante. Las ciudades pueden aparecer con todos los NPCS muertos. Yo mismo lo he podido comprobar en la partida de un amigo. Dejando todo skyrim desolado.

Yes, but right now our priority is to fix the problems that came exclusively with the FIGS version (released yesterday) not older problems. (which of course should be addressed, too)

The priority should effectively be to make a patch which makes at least playable the game for the European versions.

I think German people dissatisfied with Dawguard can ask a refund using the Right of Withdrawal which is contemplated in the German Civil Code.

As for the rest of Europe I cannot say for sure. Software is not sold, is "licensed" so the normal patronage offered by consumer protecting laws can be applied only partially. There was a proposal back in 2009 by the EU commission to introduce the so called "software liability" but I haven't heard about it since then. Probably the software developers lobby blocked it or the legislators realized such a law would have opened a whole big can of worms.

As he says, the problem where the cities appear completely devastated because of vampyre attacks is one of the most troubling glitches there is right now. This shure breaks the Side-Questlines...

Hell. There has been some news recently talking about the expansion of customer rigths to software licensing aswell making, in Europe at least, for example, the no refunding policy illegal. Can't find the source. Searching...

Don't know for shure.

For the refund, apparently in France, people asked for a refund on behalf of Microsoft which refused to them. I do not know what says the French and European law on the question.

ARTICULO: “el caso es que estos días también se está preparando por la Unión Europea un documento similar que pretende dotar a los compradores de un producto de software de las mismas protecciones que tienen cuando adquieren un bien tangible. Vamos que lo que se llama cumplir con la ley vigente en nuestro país y que por el momento toca muchas veces litigar para que se cumpla.
Se trata de hacer pagar a las empresas por productos que prácticamente se han entregado sin acabar en el mercado por conveniencia de la empresa productora o para llegar al mercado en fechas de máximas ventas, etc. y ya se irán corrigiendo los errores por el camino. No me refiero ya a empresas peque?as y con pocos recursos, sino que estamos ya hablando de grandes empresas que utilizan estas estrategias amparadas en que aquí nunca pasa nada.”

You have to talk with Microsoft if you want your money back. But this is very tricky.

@Frankespain: English is not an option?

Software falls in a big grey area as of now. At least, in the past, there was a physical medium so, even if the contents were still owned by the originator, it was possible to claim a refund on the basis that the medium had a defect that didn't allow fruition. (think of a book with a torn page or a CD coming off the factory with a scratch on the surface).

With an online distribution system, the medium is gone so, by paying a sum of money, you're just entering in a contract for licensing the content for personal use. You can argue that since the defect lies in the content itself, the distributor is essentially breaking the contract by not providing what the client was asking for. This has to be demostrated on a case by case basis so for a 20€ piece of software it's a waste of time and resources.

There are national exceptions, like the Right of Withdrawal, which the German Civil Law grants to all "customers who are also consumers" (so people buying for their own fruition of the service/content, not business activities). Using this law it would be possible to recede from the contract with the content provided under certain circumstances

be back later

just wait till they fix it. no need to refund your money, bethesda will handle this. if you want to have now your money back and tomorrow its fixed, how was this effective then? We love Bethesda, they are the origin. Todd: Our customers are just random npc's, we fill them with life!

they've said the same thing yesterday lol

Honestly, I just want that they fix the product which I bought legally. I only hope that there will be a commercial compensation to excuse their errors.

a commercial compensation from microsoft? ya the maya had reason "the end of the world"

I don't know how much Microsoft spent for obtaining this temporary exclusivity but I think that they don't appreciate this naughty surprise on behalf of Bethesda.

What I'm curious about is if they can patch it or have to completely re-release it for the foreign language versions. I've heard conflicting stories on whether or not a DLC is easily patched or not.

The guilty one is bethesda not microsoft!