Potema the Wolf Queen: redone

Post » Fri Jun 22, 2012 9:49 am

I for one think this quest needs to be redone. She certainly seemed powerful and when your going into her catacombs to destroy her she practically invites you to be at her side and take skyrim over. I definitely didn't want to kill her and being the dragonborn and also siding with her would have been awesome. Come on Bethesda let me take over with her. Did anyone else think this as well?
User avatar
Samantha Mitchell
 
Posts: 3459
Joined: Mon Nov 13, 2006 8:33 pm

Post » Fri Jun 22, 2012 1:05 pm

she would have betrayed you if you tryed and bethesda whould have made a whole new world were she took over which would have been way to much work
User avatar
Jah Allen
 
Posts: 3444
Joined: Wed Jan 24, 2007 2:09 am

Post » Fri Jun 22, 2012 6:58 pm

Yeah, they let you blot out the sun in Dawnguard but not ally with Potema, heh.
User avatar
claire ley
 
Posts: 3454
Joined: Fri Aug 04, 2006 7:48 pm

Post » Fri Jun 22, 2012 4:21 pm

This sort of thing reminds me of the old D&D days. It didn't matter what world you were playing or what the goal of the party was there was always one [censored] who wanted to play a undead and would pout if he was told no.

I didn't bother with no. I started with there is the door; don't make me Al Bundy you on the way out.
User avatar
Carlos Rojas
 
Posts: 3391
Joined: Thu Aug 16, 2007 11:19 am

Post » Fri Jun 22, 2012 1:21 pm

she practically invites you to be at her side and take skyrim over.
If i remember right, didn't she say that you could join her side after she would have made you part of her undead army.
User avatar
katsomaya Sanchez
 
Posts: 3368
Joined: Tue Jun 13, 2006 5:03 am

Post » Fri Jun 22, 2012 7:28 pm

If i remember right, didn't she say that you could join her side after she would have made you part of her undead army.

You are correct, sir!

and its not like Bethesda hasn't done something like this before, after all Dagoth Ur did ask the Nerevarine to join him but it was never really an option.
User avatar
Jonathan Egan
 
Posts: 3432
Joined: Fri Jun 22, 2007 3:27 pm

Post » Fri Jun 22, 2012 8:53 am

Out of all things I've done in TES siding with the Potema is what I'd rather do
User avatar
NIloufar Emporio
 
Posts: 3366
Joined: Tue Dec 19, 2006 6:18 pm

Post » Fri Jun 22, 2012 8:25 am

Note that being at her side requires your death and enthrallment. She's a psychopathic [censored] who wouldn't dare let some newbie steal her necromantic thunder.
User avatar
Greg Swan
 
Posts: 3413
Joined: Tue Jun 05, 2007 12:49 am

Post » Fri Jun 22, 2012 9:58 pm

Actually I'd rather side with Dagoth Ur then Potema, potema has always been unstable and was known to execute or assassinate anyone who stood in her way.
User avatar
Star Dunkels Macmillan
 
Posts: 3421
Joined: Thu Aug 31, 2006 4:00 pm

Post » Fri Jun 22, 2012 12:27 pm

I think being in charge of an undead or necromatic faction would be pretty exciting. If not Potema then maybe some of her followers? It could make for an exciting quest line like the dark brotherhood with some oddball quirky characters.
User avatar
Kim Kay
 
Posts: 3427
Joined: Fri Oct 13, 2006 10:45 am

Post » Fri Jun 22, 2012 4:26 pm

Didn't she keep some trusted vampiric generals around or something. Might have been possible to work something out.
User avatar
Dominic Vaughan
 
Posts: 3531
Joined: Mon May 14, 2007 1:47 pm

Post » Sat Jun 23, 2012 12:07 am

Didn't she keep some trusted vampiric generals around or something. Might have been possible to work something out.

You're thinking of the Camoran Usurper, though Potema did study Necromancy to make herself powerful she never really trusted anyone who she considered alive or sentient if you prefer, which vampires kinda are in a way.
User avatar
Stephanie Kemp
 
Posts: 3329
Joined: Sun Jun 25, 2006 12:39 am

Post » Fri Jun 22, 2012 10:15 am

Lich freedom ring! Potema for Emerpor!
User avatar
Emma
 
Posts: 3287
Joined: Mon Aug 28, 2006 12:51 am

Post » Fri Jun 22, 2012 11:35 pm



You're thinking of the Camoran Usurper, though Potema did study Necromancy to make herself powerful she never really trusted anyone who she considered alive or sentient if you prefer, which vampires kinda are in a way.
no don't actually know the first guy. Was thinking of the wolf queen. Was stated in a book that it was rumored she had vampiric generals and vampires seem to guard her tomb so I figured that confirmed the rumor. she could use undead for the bulk of her forces, but she would need someone intelligent to lead them.
User avatar
Devils Cheek
 
Posts: 3561
Joined: Sun Aug 13, 2006 10:24 pm

Post » Fri Jun 22, 2012 11:41 pm

Hmm its possible that she did as for a necromancy faction, I would love to have something like that but to show the positive side of Necromancy, to many people focus on the dark and evil necromancers. There are plenty of good necromancers and a faction explaining why necromancy isn't entirely evil would be nice.
User avatar
Ally Chimienti
 
Posts: 3409
Joined: Fri Jan 19, 2007 6:53 am

Post » Fri Jun 22, 2012 6:41 pm

Well, I bet she would kick some Thalmor but at least. Maybe get to be Empress at last.
User avatar
Minako
 
Posts: 3379
Joined: Sun Mar 18, 2007 9:50 pm

Post » Fri Jun 22, 2012 8:48 am

Hmm its possible that she did as for a necromancy faction, I would love to have something like that but to show the positive side of Necromancy, to many people focus on the dark and evil necromancers. There are plenty of good necromancers and a faction explaining why necromancy isn't entirely evil would be nice.
Necromancy is for the most part evil. You are forcing the undead to be your slaves. Their is a reason most despise the dark art. Can a necromancer be good, sure but it would be like using the mace of molag bal to save an orphanage, the mace is still evil. This is why a collection of necromancers usually end up evil, because advancing their art and attempting to gain more power usually requires a lot of people to die and be enslaved.
User avatar
Maeva
 
Posts: 3349
Joined: Mon Mar 26, 2007 11:27 pm

Post » Fri Jun 22, 2012 7:57 pm

Well, I bet she would kick some Thalmor but at least. Maybe get to be Empress at last.
Lol, like the priest said she would have the most legitimate claim to the throne being a septiem and all.
User avatar
Jon O
 
Posts: 3270
Joined: Wed Nov 28, 2007 9:48 pm

Post » Fri Jun 22, 2012 11:45 pm

Necromancy is for the most part evil. You are forcing the undead to be your slaves. Their is a reason most despise the dark art. Can a necromancer be good, sure but it would be like using the mace of molag bal to save an orphanage, the mace is still evil. This is why a collection of necromancers usually end up evil, because advancing their art and attempting to gain more power usually requires a lot of people to die and be enslaved.
Since in most cases you are reanimating a corpse that the soul is no longer using I'm going to have to say not evil. Not all types of necromancy are inherently evil.
User avatar
Connor Wing
 
Posts: 3465
Joined: Wed Jun 20, 2007 1:22 am

Post » Fri Jun 22, 2012 11:57 am


Since in most cases you are reanimating a corpse that the soul is no longer using I'm going to have to say not evil. Not all types of necromancy are inherently evil.
You have to bind the soul for them to be alive. Why do you think you hear thank you when a zombie is killed.
User avatar
kristy dunn
 
Posts: 3410
Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2007 2:08 am

Post » Fri Jun 22, 2012 10:26 pm

Necromancy is for the most part evil. You are forcing the undead to be your slaves. Their is a reason most despise the dark art. Can a necromancer be good, sure but it would be like using the mace of molag bal to save an orphanage, the mace is still evil. This is why a collection of necromancers usually end up evil, because advancing their art and attempting to gain more power usually requires a lot of people to die and be enslaved.

No not all necromancy is evil and not all of it is making thralls or forcing the undead to be your slaves, look at the Telvanni most of the wizard lords used necromancy and are they evil? Nope and necromancy was actually taught in the Arcane University until that arkay lover took over before Oblivion. Necromancy is a legitimate school of magic that is often treated negatively due to ignorance and stereotyping.

You have to bind the soul for them to be alive. Why do you think you hear thank you when a zombie is killed.

Actually no, not at all sometimes you can just use your magicka to use their body as a puppet, there have been necromancers who've made zombies without the need of a soul, what you're thinking of is a thrall and even so its still possible to use magicka or a white soul to control the body without the need of a black soul.

Lol, like the priest said she would have the most legitimate claim to the throne being a septiem and all.

False, she would have no real claim to the throne, thats like saying if you revived a member of the Reman family that means they have a legitimate claim when they actually don't. The septim line is dead and has no authority even if one of them were revived and returned to full glory, the septims no longer rule Cyrodiil because the third empire is gone, we are in the age of the fourth empire and the Medes dynasty.
User avatar
Gwen
 
Posts: 3367
Joined: Sun Apr 01, 2007 3:34 am

Post » Fri Jun 22, 2012 11:37 pm



No not all necromancy is evil and not all of it is making thralls or forcing the undead to be your slaves, look at the Telvanni most of the wizard lords used necromancy and are they evil? Nope and necromancy was actually taught in the Arcane University until that arkay lover took over before Oblivion. Necromancy is a legitimate school of magic that is often treated negatively due to ignorance and stereotyping.



Actually no, not at all sometimes you can just use your magicka to use their body as a puppet, there have been necromancers who've made zombies without the need of a soul.
a few things
One. The telvanni were slavers so an undead slave was not much different to them. They were also very arrogant, power hungry and had little value for life. That is what made them so fun and interesting.

Two the arcane university had restrictions in place on necromancy that prevented it's abuse. One I recall was that only bodies supplied by the empire were to be used, usually criminals or traitors.

Three, pretty sure they still need a soul in the body.Think they would have to either already have the soul bonded or grab one from the soul Crain. I could be wrong on this and may need to double check, but I believe that is how it worked. Remember there is a whole arkay funeral practice that prevents the binding of souls back to the body. This is why necromancers hate arkay.

Four, the whole art of necromancy seems to revolve around souls. They create black soul gems, trap souls in undead bodies or as spirit servants and even soul trap themselves during the process of becoming liches. The whole messing with black souls is considered evil or dark for the most part.
User avatar
james kite
 
Posts: 3460
Joined: Sun Jul 22, 2007 8:52 am

Post » Fri Jun 22, 2012 10:35 am

Actually I'd rather side with Dagoth Ur then Potema, potema has always been unstable and was known to execute or assassinate anyone who stood in her way.

It's because of his voice, isn't it? :P
User avatar
Vera Maslar
 
Posts: 3468
Joined: Wed Sep 27, 2006 2:32 pm

Post » Fri Jun 22, 2012 1:43 pm

False, she would have no real claim to the throne, thats like saying if you revived a member of the Reman family that means they have a legitimate claim when they actually don't. The septim line is dead and has no authority even if one of them were revived and returned to full glory, the septims no longer rule Cyrodiil because the third empire is gone, we are in the age of the fourth empire and the Medes dynasty.
I know was more of a joke. Even if she did no one would have allowed it anyway.
User avatar
Mrs. Patton
 
Posts: 3418
Joined: Fri Jan 26, 2007 8:00 am

Post » Fri Jun 22, 2012 9:13 pm

It's because of his voice, isn't it? :tongue:

That voice man...That voice can get chicks and inspire men.


a few things
One. The telvanni were slavers so an undead slave was not much different to them. They were also very arrogant, power hungry and had little value for life. That is what made them so fun and interesting.

Two the arcane university had restrictions in place on necromancy that prevented it's abuse. One I recall was that only bodies supplied by the empire were to be used, usually criminals or traitors.

Three, pretty sure they still need a soul in the body.Think they would have to either already have the soul bonded or grab one from the soul Crain. I could be wrong on this and may need to double check, but I believe that is how it worked. Remember there is a whole arkay funeral practice that prevents the binding of souls back to the body. This is why necromancers hate arkay.

Four, the whole art of necromancy seems to revolve around souls. They create black soul gems, trap souls in undead bodies or as spirit servants and even soul trap themselves during the process of becoming liches. The whole messing with black souls is considered evil or dark for the most part.

Actually though there were books saying the Telvanni were a major part of the slave trade there were few slaves actually in-game that belonged to the Telvanni, and even so most slaves are weak and would be poor specimens to anyone but a novice and there were Telvanni like Fyr who expanded his life span by 4000 years and used Necromancy to create instead of enslave. Thus further proving my point and while the University did have restrictions the body of Criminals and traitors is perfectly fine since most of the time they were murderers, thus a fitting punishment. Also not all Necromancer aspired to become liches, Fyr being my example again as well as several other Telvanni necromancers who lived to an old age due to necromancy and never went towards lichdom and finally the whole soul thing is more of a theory I had :P
User avatar
Tammie Flint
 
Posts: 3336
Joined: Mon Aug 14, 2006 12:12 am

Next

Return to V - Skyrim