Skyrim is the Hanzo sword of video games

Post » Fri Jun 22, 2012 2:42 am

You wanted examples of better non-bethesda games? ok.

First I would mention: Mount & Blade any of the games in that series is better than skyrim. Combat is better, battles are bigger, you can own your own business and I would even say that romance is deeper. Though I guess the game is not really fantasy in the magic and monsters kind of way, but the realm it is set in is made up, well With fire and sword is set in our world, but the other two.

Baldurs gate and Icewind dale etc. Great story, a huge variety of monsters, lovable characters etc. If you are a graphics person however, this might not be a game for you as it is rather old.

MInecraft, HUGE open world, you can look like just about anything, great unique fantasy setting with multiple reals such as the nether and the end.

There you have five games already.

And you said the Hanzo sword of gaming and that's way bigger than just open world fantasy RPGs so there I would also like to mention:

the STALKER series, great games, great setting, good sotry. Dawn of War, well this is an RTS, but it's very entertaining and has a great sci-fi, fantasy (there are orcs and magic and stuff) setting. I could go on about this.

And I see that you just talked about a unique experience from skyrim, you will be really hard to peruade as the experience from skyrim is unique, just like any other game. No other game have ever had the TES feel mixed with meh before. Don't get me wron skyrim is a good game, just not a good TES game.
But as I said every game has it's own unique feeling, but the games I listed above are just a few non-bethesda I can think of that feels "better" than Skyrim IMO.


Correction, Skyrim is a better RPG than anything that is released nowadays. There are plenty of old RPGs that are still available.
Okay your opinion :P Then you are like me,But like skyrim is for you oblivion is like that for me. Its not a good for a TES Game,But still a amazing game,Well there is just something special about skyrim for me.But istill love every TES game and come back to play morrowind wich is my favourite,oh and daggerfall<3
User avatar
Damned_Queen
 
Posts: 3425
Joined: Fri Apr 20, 2007 5:18 pm

Post » Fri Jun 22, 2012 11:33 am

The OP was asking for an example of a game that does what Skyrim does and isn't also a Bethesda title.
Honestly, Bethesda is the only developer than can actually do the open world RPG format with a consistent level of quality and professionalism. It's too bad, because if somebody else were to make a foray into the genre, whilst still preserving the ideals of complex character development and writing seen in so many 90's RPGs, maybe that competition would be the kick in the pants Bethesda needs to re-assess where the series has been going.

I sincerely hope Wasteland 2 will be a wakeup call to developers and RPG gamers everywhere. I fear that it'll pass under the radar thouguh, because "hurr 2D" and "hurr turn based".
User avatar
Jessica White
 
Posts: 3419
Joined: Sun Aug 20, 2006 5:03 am

Post » Fri Jun 22, 2012 8:36 am

I agree with the OP that Bethesda games are unlike any others. Isn't that precisely the reason they should be compared with each other and not games that bear little resemblance?

I love the Baldur's Gate and TES games and they are both usually classified as RPGs but they are so different they don't really belong in the same genre at all. I would say rather that BG is a tactical RPG, Skyrim is an Action RPG.

I don't understand the point of your question but it seems like you are trying to set up some kind of strawman argument: No one can name a comparable RPG therefore Skyrim is a great RPG. Is that it?

Anyway, off the top of my head I can think of a few open world RPGs: Most of the Ultima games, Fallouts 1 & 2 and any number of MMORPGs if they are allowed to be included.
User avatar
Jeremy Kenney
 
Posts: 3293
Joined: Sun Aug 05, 2007 5:36 pm

Post » Thu Jun 21, 2012 7:26 pm

You just listed a whole ton of games that aren't even remotely open-world, with the exception of Minecraft, which hardly counts because Minecraft doesn't have a world as much as a giant sandbox to build things in.

The OP was asking for an example of a game that does what Skyrim does and isn't also a Bethesda title.
mhm, yeah not even remotely open world, and I'd say a lot of those games do the same as skyrim, you kill, you explore, you loot and become rich in the end.

Could you please be more specific about what skyrim does, there are tons of things that it does, and tons of things that it should have done, but didn't do.
User avatar
courtnay
 
Posts: 3412
Joined: Sun Nov 05, 2006 8:49 pm

Post » Thu Jun 21, 2012 10:21 pm

This!! Exactly. I tend to be critical of Skyrim for a lot of reasons and I hope my criticism is constructive. But I am always comparing it to other TES games and FO, and most other posts I have read complaining about Skyrim tend to compare it to one of those games. I am trying to show some love here for Skyrim by pointing out that Bethesda delivers a product that is like no other, while at the same time to challenge my fellow critics to come up with an example of another game to compare Skyrim to besides a prior Bethesda game.

Hi there Turija! Sure hope your day is going your way.

Whenever the "apples to oranges" card is played it is usually a defensive move. You most certainly can draw meaningful comparisons between any two games, no matter how distinct. I'd say your claim that SKyrim is unique and thus escapes comparisons is, frankly, a bit contrived. I'm sure you're aware Gameinformer, IGN, Gamespot and the like usually review games under certain criteria, presentation, gameplay, etc. Why wouldn't one establish legitimate comparisons between Skyrim and other games on those departments? What's not legitimate about saying this or that gme has better combat than Skyrim, or, conversey, stating Skyrim's graphics are the best in the genre? It seems to me the "apples to oranges" card is but a tactic to elude comparisons one predicts disadvantageous. Usually the rationale goes liek this: You can't have X feature, like Z game does, because Skyrim is an Open World RPG. First it is up to those making such claim to demonstrate it. Second, even then it is possible to argue that X feature is so important TES needs to foresake some of its OWRPG identity in order to include it. Everything is open for discussion. Perhaps the freshest example is locational damage, which keeps getting deflected becaue it is not RPG friendly. I agree. But it is far worse having NPCs walking around with slit throats or arrowed chests than Elder Scrolls morphing into something it currently is not. I have no attatchment to its RPG nature, but that's me and I can certainly understand others not feeling the same way. It mostly boils down to personal preference.
User avatar
Sarah Knight
 
Posts: 3416
Joined: Mon Jun 19, 2006 5:02 am

Post » Fri Jun 22, 2012 12:02 am

Recent games that delivered a better history/interaction/character development in my opinion:

-Gothic series;
-Dragon Age 1;
-Fallout series;
-Risen;
-Mass effect series.

They are not better games than skyrim, but IMO they are better RPG. Of course its just my opinion, but for me history/interaction/character development is more important than the simulation of a fantasy life (TES is the best on this).
User avatar
Gavin Roberts
 
Posts: 3335
Joined: Fri Jun 08, 2007 8:14 pm

Post » Fri Jun 22, 2012 7:50 am

Besides bethesda games I can't think of any
User avatar
Catherine Harte
 
Posts: 3379
Joined: Sat Aug 26, 2006 12:58 pm

Post » Thu Jun 21, 2012 9:37 pm

What exactly makes Skyrim an "open world" other than the giant landscape you play in?

Because certainly it's not "open world" in the sense where your actions have any meaning in the world.
User avatar
Amiee Kent
 
Posts: 3447
Joined: Thu Jun 15, 2006 2:25 pm

Post » Thu Jun 21, 2012 10:51 pm

What exactly makes Skyrim an "open world" other than the giant landscape you play in?

Because certainly it's not "open world" in the sense where your actions have any meaning in the world.
OH THAT"S WHAT OPEN WORLD IS!!! See and here I thought it was world open to you.
User avatar
Alyna
 
Posts: 3412
Joined: Wed Aug 30, 2006 4:54 am

Post » Fri Jun 22, 2012 1:38 am

OH THAT"S WHAT OPEN WORLD IS!!! See and here I thought it was world open to you.

Then that would be every game.
User avatar
Kaley X
 
Posts: 3372
Joined: Wed Jul 05, 2006 5:46 pm

Post » Fri Jun 22, 2012 11:38 am

I agree with the OP that Bethesda games are unlike any others. Isn't that precisely the reason they should be compared with each other and not games that bear little resemblance?

Well that is one of the things I am trying to find out with this thread. Are there games out there that bear enough resemblance to Skyrim to make a good comparison. There have been a couple of suggestions in this thread for games that I plan to try myself to see how they stack up.

I don't understand the point of your question but it seems like you are trying to set up some kind of strawman argument: No one can name a comparable RPG therefore Skyrim is a great RPG. Is that it?

No, I am not trying to prove whether Skyrim is a great RPG or not. But I am trying to provide some context for those who claim it is not a great RPG.
User avatar
Ronald
 
Posts: 3319
Joined: Sun Aug 05, 2007 12:16 am

Post » Thu Jun 21, 2012 10:17 pm

Its a great RPG, but it fails on not delivering a good interaction with the npcs and not having a great story to tell. theres another games that are better on that.
User avatar
Emilie Joseph
 
Posts: 3387
Joined: Thu Mar 15, 2007 6:28 am

Post » Fri Jun 22, 2012 11:19 am

Well that is one of the things I am trying to find out with this thread. Are there games out there that bear enough resemblance to Skyrim to make a good comparison. There have been a couple of suggestions in this thread for games that I plan to try myself to see how they stack up.



No, I am not trying to prove whether Skyrim is a great RPG or not. But I am trying to provide some context for those who claim it is not a great RPG.

Hello again Turija.

Just how extensive would you like the comparison to get? Just RPGs? Just Open World RPGs? Trying to talk people into or out of liking or disliking anything is futile, in my opinion. So certain individuals feel SKyrim isn't such a great RPG. How is setting the "propper" framework, context or other abstraction is ever going to change their direct experience playing the game? Please excuse me if I'm being unfair, but much like the forumer you were replying to, I'm tempted to believe there's an agenda behind the question beinbg asked.
User avatar
Jordan Moreno
 
Posts: 3462
Joined: Thu May 10, 2007 4:47 pm

Post » Fri Jun 22, 2012 12:13 am

It's a poor RPG, and a mediocre action game. It tries to be things that it is not, when it would be better if it had a more focused vision.
User avatar
Agnieszka Bak
 
Posts: 3540
Joined: Fri Jun 16, 2006 4:15 pm

Post » Fri Jun 22, 2012 12:48 am

Then that would be every game.
I've had plenty of games where I looked over the horizon and thought "where's that? why can't I go there?" Every game has to stop being a game somewhere and remind you its not reality but Skyrim is an Open World game IMO. Sure its got RPG basics and some nice action in there but really its exploring with enough nerdyness involved for me to play.

An RPG is where I would expect my actions to change something in the world. Skyrim doesn't really do this like maybe it should (Skyrim should be leaned more towards an RPG argument) but expecting the game to bend to your will (and that includes everyone that is upset in anyway and expect Beth to fix it just for them) is a waste of your time. When a feedback thread comes up on the internet that askes players to submit ideas for TES 6, THEN go crazy with complaints.
User avatar
Scott
 
Posts: 3385
Joined: Fri Nov 30, 2007 2:59 am

Post » Thu Jun 21, 2012 7:24 pm

mhm, yeah not even remotely open world, and I'd say a lot of those games do the same as skyrim, you kill, you explore, you loot and become rich in the end.

Could you please be more specific about what skyrim does, there are tons of things that it does, and tons of things that it should have done, but didn't do.

Open world refers to a non-linear game, where you aren't channeled down a particular path and where you aren't restricted from going anywhere at any time. Even in the less linear areas of a game like Baldur's Gate, you still aren't able to access the whole game world at once.

Then that would be every game.

No, no it wouldn't.
User avatar
Adam
 
Posts: 3446
Joined: Sat Jun 02, 2007 2:56 pm

Post » Thu Jun 21, 2012 10:58 pm

Hello again Turija.

Just how extensive would you like the comparison to get? Just RPGs? Just Open World RPGs? Trying to talk people into or out of liking or disliking anything is futile, in my opinion. So certain individuals feel SKyrim isn't such a great RPG. How is setting the "propper" framework, context or other abstraction is ever going to change their direct experience playing the game? Please excuse me if I'm being unfair, but much like the forumer you were replying to, I'm tempted to believe there's an agenda behind the question beinbg asked.

Hmm. I am not sure why folks think I have some sort of hidden agenda here. I have been pretty upfront with the fact that I have criticized Skyrim a lot on this forum, but overall I really enjoy playing Skyrim despite the many things about it I wish were improved.

Here is what I mean by "context." Since Skyrim is unique, it is the "only game in town" for folks looking for a roleplaying experience that simulates old pen and paper AD&D in an open world where you can explore. So no matter how much people may dislike certain aspects of it, there is really no substitute for it. Which does not mean people should not criticize it or ask for it to be improved. Heck, I do that all the time. However, when I would complain about stuff as a child my parents used to tell me that "beggars can't be choosers" and their is some truth to that old saying. Lack of alternatives therefore provides some context to the discussion about whether Skyrim is a good RPG and may be a good defense to some of the overly harsh criticism the game receives in this forum.
User avatar
Louise Lowe
 
Posts: 3262
Joined: Fri Jul 28, 2006 9:08 am

Post » Thu Jun 21, 2012 11:16 pm

So no matter how much people may dislike certain aspects of it, there is really no substitute for it.
There is a substitute, it's called older TES games, but you excluded those from the discussion.
User avatar
CORY
 
Posts: 3335
Joined: Sat Oct 13, 2007 9:54 pm

Post » Fri Jun 22, 2012 3:01 am

There is a substitute, it's called older TES games, but you excluded those from the discussion.

His point is that the only thing that you can compare a game like Skyrim to is an Elder Scrolls game. That alone speaks worlds about its quality.
User avatar
Markie Mark
 
Posts: 3420
Joined: Tue Dec 04, 2007 7:24 am

Post » Fri Jun 22, 2012 4:42 am

His point is that the only thing that you can compare a game like Skyrim to is an Elder Scrolls game. That alone speaks worlds about its quality.
No, it speaks words about the setting, and I'd say Fallout 3 and New Vegas can beat it.

I got it guys, New Vegas compares, and that's not a bethesda game, that's obsidian.
User avatar
SamanthaLove
 
Posts: 3565
Joined: Mon Dec 11, 2006 3:54 am

Post » Fri Jun 22, 2012 1:01 am

Hmm. I am not sure why folks think I have some sort of hidden agenda here. I have been pretty upfront with the fact that I have criticized Skyrim a lot on this forum, but overall I really enjoy playing Skyrim despite the many things about it I wish were improved.

Here is what I mean by "context." Since Skyrim is unique, it is the "only game in town" for folks looking for a roleplaying experience that simulates old pen and paper AD&D in an open world where you can explore. So no matter how much people may dislike certain aspects of it, there is really no substitute for it. Which does not mean people should not criticize it or ask for it to be improved. Heck, I do that all the time. However, when I would complain about stuff as a child my parents used to tell me that "beggars can't be choosers" and their is some truth to that old saying. Lack of alternatives therefore provides some context to the discussion about whether Skyrim is a good RPG and may be a good defense to some of the overly harsh criticism the game receives in this forum.

I see your point. I myself do not dwell on the whole Skyrim's RPGness conundrum. It's more productive to ask whether it's a good game or not. It is. Whether combat needs improvement. It does. In which direction. More variety, locational damage, more qualitative levelling up, less quantitative. I happen to believe sheer adherence to the RPG canon will stop TES from becoming a better game but I realize I'm in the minority here. I haven't played Kingdoms of Amalur, nor will I ever, but combat there does seem to be moe varied.
User avatar
Annick Charron
 
Posts: 3367
Joined: Fri Dec 29, 2006 3:03 pm

Post » Fri Jun 22, 2012 10:00 am

There is a substitute, it's called older TES games, but you excluded those from the discussion.
You should play those. Their good games. Stop worrying about Skyrim and where it's going and where all of TES is going.
User avatar
Erich Lendermon
 
Posts: 3322
Joined: Sat Nov 03, 2007 4:20 pm

Post » Fri Jun 22, 2012 3:43 am

You should play those. Their good games. Stop worrying about Skyrim and where it's going and where all of TES is going.
Maybe I should do some heavy modding soon, might make it better.
User avatar
Samantha Mitchell
 
Posts: 3459
Joined: Mon Nov 13, 2006 8:33 pm

Post » Fri Jun 22, 2012 4:09 am

I like Skyrim, but it and TES have never been my favorites in general. It feeds me a diet of almost everything I don't prefer in an RPG.... yet it does it well. Not sure what to compare it to. It's like a meal I never go out of my way for, but once it's set before me, it's pretty good. I haven't played an open world RPG as good either. Bethesda cooks this meal better than anyone else.

When I talk about what I actually prefer though, it's... something with more Adventure (Adventure, as in genre) features. Lots of dialogue, character development, branching plot choices, etc.. I miss that in Skyrim. Even a *generally* inferior game like DA2 got more replays out of me.
User avatar
noa zarfati
 
Posts: 3410
Joined: Sun Apr 15, 2007 5:54 am

Post » Fri Jun 22, 2012 2:58 am

I've had plenty of games where I looked over the horizon and thought "where's that? why can't I go there?" Every game has to stop being a game somewhere and remind you its not reality but Skyrim is an Open World game IMO. Sure its got RPG basics and some nice action in there but really its exploring with enough nerdyness involved for me to play.

Why are Skyrim's invisible borders any better than STALKER: CoP's invisible borders?
User avatar
CYCO JO-NATE
 
Posts: 3431
Joined: Fri Sep 21, 2007 12:41 pm

PreviousNext

Return to V - Skyrim