6÷2(1+2)

Post » Sun May 29, 2011 2:20 am

I got 1.


Do the ones in the parenthesis first guys!

Third Eye = You pastor from a philosophical view point is right, mathematics are just a bunch of symbols that only mean what the vast majrity want or are learned to believe. In this case these four dots . . . . = 4
User avatar
Natasha Callaghan
 
Posts: 3523
Joined: Sat Dec 09, 2006 7:44 pm

Post » Sat May 28, 2011 11:46 am

ITT:

iGuess pwning people. :P

But seriously, I got nine, and I know what iGuess was saying, and I've taken College Algebra twice for christ sakes!
User avatar
Claire
 
Posts: 3329
Joined: Tue Oct 24, 2006 4:01 pm

Post » Sat May 28, 2011 8:39 pm

I don't really see why any of this matters.
User avatar
~Amy~
 
Posts: 3478
Joined: Sat Aug 12, 2006 5:38 am

Post » Sat May 28, 2011 7:32 pm

I svck at maths and said 9, You always do the brackets first (one of the few things I remember from my poor attempt at maths...) hence the nine...
User avatar
N3T4
 
Posts: 3428
Joined: Wed Aug 08, 2007 8:36 pm

Post » Sun May 29, 2011 1:01 am

Aren't you supposed to get rid of the parentheses in the first place, not simply do what's inside them?


Not really, but even if you remove the parentheses, you still have

6 / 2 * 3 = 9

(process from left to right, not right to left)
User avatar
Kelly John
 
Posts: 3413
Joined: Tue Jun 13, 2006 6:40 am

Post » Sat May 28, 2011 9:25 pm

When you put the 6 over the 2 like that...

No, that is irrelevant. The only relevant thing here is that the division comes before the multiplication in the formula. Since they have the same priority, division should be done first.
User avatar
Naughty not Nice
 
Posts: 3527
Joined: Sat Nov 04, 2006 6:14 am

Post » Sun May 29, 2011 1:42 am

I don't see where the problem is.
6/2*3 = 9
6/(2*3) = 1

I can't understand why mathematicians are debating about that.
There is only one solution, and no other mathematical interpretation is possible.
User avatar
Mylizards Dot com
 
Posts: 3379
Joined: Fri May 04, 2007 1:59 pm

Post » Sat May 28, 2011 2:24 pm

at first I got nine because of doing (1+2)= 3

then I went 6÷2= 3

then went 3 x 3= 9

but then I figured out that you add the parenthesis up, multiple then divide. then your answer is 1. very confusing

that shows you our math rules need to be changed around a tiny bit

I still think it is nine though...
User avatar
Amanda Furtado
 
Posts: 3454
Joined: Fri Dec 15, 2006 4:22 pm

Post » Sat May 28, 2011 6:51 pm

Not really, but even if you remove the parentheses, you still have

6 / 2 * 3 = 9

(process from left to right, not right to left)

He means "get rid of" as in multiply out each individual term in the brackets by 2, and then use PEMDAS or whatever was taught at your high schools/secondary schools.

@Veeno
I know that. I'm just saying that I found it more obvious when written with the 6 over the 2. While I have failed miserably at this problem, I am doing maths AS level: I know about the order of operations.
User avatar
jaideep singh
 
Posts: 3357
Joined: Sun Jul 08, 2007 8:45 pm

Post » Sat May 28, 2011 7:51 pm

Am I the only one who got serious TES flashbacks after reading through the thread?

Answers people are getting are coming out as either 9 or 1.

The 9 and 1. Nine Divines. Anyone? No? Gah. :rolleyes:
User avatar
Andres Lechuga
 
Posts: 3406
Joined: Sun Aug 12, 2007 8:47 pm

Post » Sat May 28, 2011 2:42 pm

Third Eye = You pastor from a philosophical view point is right, mathematics are just a bunch of symbols that only mean what the vast majrity want or are learned to believe. In this case these four dots . . . . = 4


Plato disagrees.
User avatar
Jessie
 
Posts: 3343
Joined: Sat Oct 14, 2006 2:54 am

Post » Sat May 28, 2011 9:12 pm

Are you guys nuts? Why is this even "controversial"

I concur.
User avatar
Javier Borjas
 
Posts: 3392
Joined: Tue Nov 13, 2007 6:34 pm

Post » Sun May 29, 2011 1:01 am

There's two possible answers depending on how you view it, which makes it a poor way of presenting the equation.

Some schools of thought value juxtaposition based multiplication over division, and some don't. So either the person posing the question has to adjust it to be clearer, or explain the syntax chosen more clearly.
User avatar
Alan Cutler
 
Posts: 3163
Joined: Sun Jul 01, 2007 9:59 am

Post » Sat May 28, 2011 6:00 pm

Plato disagrees.

If any philosopher wants to get uppity with math it should be Pythagoras.

And how so?
User avatar
Janette Segura
 
Posts: 3512
Joined: Wed Aug 22, 2007 12:36 am

Post » Sat May 28, 2011 5:20 pm

that shows you our math rules need to be changed around a tiny bit

There is no need for this.
It is defined that when you write 6/2*something then 6 should only be divided by 2. If you want to divide something by a term like 2*(1+2) then brackets are needed, else it's not mathematically correct.
User avatar
Allison Sizemore
 
Posts: 3492
Joined: Wed Jul 19, 2006 6:09 am

Post » Sat May 28, 2011 1:24 pm

I can't understand why mathematicians are debating about that.

Mathematicians are not debating about this. Random people on the Internet (who apparently fail at maths) are.
User avatar
Alessandra Botham
 
Posts: 3440
Joined: Mon Nov 13, 2006 6:27 pm

Post » Sat May 28, 2011 7:03 pm

I usually do multiplication before division, so I got 1.

I think the correct answer is 9 because multiplication and division come at the same time in the order of operations, you just do whatever comes first, left to right.

Why is this so debatable? When it comes down to it. It's order of operations. Answer is 9
User avatar
Sam Parker
 
Posts: 3358
Joined: Sat May 12, 2007 3:10 am

Post » Sat May 28, 2011 6:27 pm

I fail at math, so I am not debating. I like 9, so 9 it shall be.
User avatar
kevin ball
 
Posts: 3399
Joined: Fri Jun 08, 2007 10:02 pm

Post » Sat May 28, 2011 9:38 pm

But I think the correct answer is 9 because multiplication and division come at the same time in the order of operations, you just do whatever comes first, left to right.

And you are correct.
User avatar
Angela
 
Posts: 3492
Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2007 8:33 am

Post » Sat May 28, 2011 10:45 pm

I usually do multiplication before division, so I got 1.

But I think the correct answer is 9 because multiplication and division come at the same time in the order of operations, you just do whatever comes first, left to right.

What people are doing to get 1 is either ignoring left-to-right or are doing the problem 6÷(2(1+2)) but that's not the problem presented in the OP. It does not say do 2*3 first.
User avatar
Jade Payton
 
Posts: 3417
Joined: Mon Sep 11, 2006 1:01 pm

Post » Sat May 28, 2011 6:07 pm

Better to write it as a fraction. Fractions are far clearer.
User avatar
Tyrone Haywood
 
Posts: 3472
Joined: Sun Apr 29, 2007 7:10 am

Post » Sat May 28, 2011 3:29 pm

http://oi51.tinypic.com/2ur032o.jpg followed by my http://oi55.tinypic.com/14vgyz5.jpg.

:P

lol :P

Well for now I'm going to go with this:

I have seen this discussed to death, and someone on another forum actually contacted someone with knowledge on the subject. The answer is 1 or 9 because of how the question is written and how some of the rules are followed. I can't remember where it (the topic got really big), but one point he made is that a lot of people consider x(y+z) to be of higher priority than basic dividing, and do it before the basic division in the equation.

Edit: After trying to find the information on it, it's lost to the internet since every forum seems to be discussing this type of equation.


I looked into and he's right, it seems to be a pretty widely debated topic across the internet, a lot of people are saying 1 and a lot of people say 9. So it's not that anyone is wrong per se, but rather seems to be a break down and division in the mathematics community. I can see why people believe it's 9 if you make multiplication and division equal and interchangeable, but I also see why people (me included) say it's 1 if you follow PEMDAS down to the letter and set multiplication as a priority over division.

Very interesting debate.
User avatar
Andrea Pratt
 
Posts: 3396
Joined: Mon Jul 31, 2006 4:49 am

Post » Sat May 28, 2011 11:57 pm

I svck at maths and said 9, You always do the brackets first (one of the few things I remember from my poor attempt at maths...) hence the nine...

Doesn't doing the brackets first make it 7? 6/2(1+2), 6/2+4, 3+4=7

I'm going with 9 now after seeing some examples through the thread, but my first answer was 1 'cause I messed up. You could do it like 6/2 + 12/2 and still get 9.
User avatar
RObert loVes MOmmy
 
Posts: 3432
Joined: Fri Dec 08, 2006 10:12 am

Post » Sat May 28, 2011 10:42 pm

Useless problem, most people just write 6/2 as a fraction so you do 6/2 first and then 1+2.
User avatar
David John Hunter
 
Posts: 3376
Joined: Sun May 13, 2007 8:24 am

Post » Sat May 28, 2011 2:26 pm

If any philosopher wants to get uppity with math it should be Pythagoras.

And how so?


Theory of Forms.

Forms > Maths > The Physical > Shadows/reflections.
User avatar
Louise
 
Posts: 3407
Joined: Wed Nov 01, 2006 1:06 pm

PreviousNext

Return to Othor Games