Nevermind, my recommended resolution is 1366 X 768. Here are the rest of the specs again:
Windows 7 home premium 64-bit
ATI Radeon HD6470M 3GB
i5 dual core with hyperthreading @ 2.3 GhZ
6 GB of ram
That CPU is slightly slow, unless it has a Turbo speed, but considering how comparatively low the resolution is, should manage Medium Image Quality without affecting the animation.
Trying to figure out why my laptop wont run Skyrim. I have a Dell XPS 17 that runs in 1600x900 resolution. Intel I5 2.5ghz, 8 gigs RAM, Nvidia geforce gt 435m. Game installs fine. When i go to play it, it recommends running it in low setting.
Chances are very good that the default onboard video in the i5 is what is so bad; you have to force the stupid thing OFF when gaming. Once you have the actual card running, don't expect better than Low-Medium from it, depending upon the screen resolution.
Running this on my Sony Vaio FW465J notebook.
Core 2 Duo P8700 @ 2.53ghz
4GB RAM
Windows 7 64bit
ATI Radeon HD4650 1GB (possibly underclocked by Sony)
1600x900
Skyrim auto-detected "high" settings; however, running the game with AA+AF enabled resulted in heat-related crashes. (Laptop was sitting on the kitchen table, not on my lap or in bed.) Turning off the AA+AF provided an enjoyable and very playable game, similar to, if not smoother than, a reasonably modded Oblivion.
My only complaints are with Steam.
Three years ago, an HD 4650 was just barely Medium when it was a desktop card. It is actually a low end part now, when it's downgraded to use in a laptop, so the Launcher is as stupid about graphics card ranking as Bethesda's moronic official system requirements are.
According to Bethesda's pre-release publicity, however, even a card such as yours could easily run at Medium.
Would this work?
Intel Core 2 Duo P7450(2.13GHz) high end dual core
4GB Ram
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260M 1gb
According to the benchmarks that are appearing now, that CPU is on the slow side, actually, unless it has a Turbo mode.