Unofficial "Will My PC Run Skyrim" Thread #55 w hard

Post » Sun May 27, 2012 4:37 am

Crazy question.
I have a Gateway LX6810 - 01
It has all the specs to run this (quad core processor, 8gb ram, more than enough hard drive space) but my question is if my video card is good enough to play this game.
I have an Nvidia GT 120 that does not show up on the list at all.
If anyone has played this game with that video card...or knows if it is playable with that card, please let me know, otherwise I might have to svck it up and get this game for my xbox360 which I would prefer not to do.
Thank you for your time.
User avatar
Emma Louise Adams
 
Posts: 3527
Joined: Wed Jun 28, 2006 4:15 pm

Post » Sun May 27, 2012 1:51 am

Crazy question.
I have a Gateway LX6810 - 01
It has all the specs to run this (quad core processor, 8gb ram, more than enough hard drive space) but my question is if my video card is good enough to play this game.
I have an Nvidia GT 120 that does not show up on the list at all.
If anyone has played this game with that video card...or knows if it is playable with that card, please let me know, otherwise I might have to svck it up and get this game for my xbox360 which I would prefer not to do.
Thank you for your time.
nVIDIA GeForce GT 120, correct? it is a renamed GeForce 9500GT, which should give you enough performance to play the game, if at medium settings. Depends on your resolution too, though
User avatar
Chavala
 
Posts: 3355
Joined: Sun Jun 25, 2006 5:28 am

Post » Sun May 27, 2012 2:56 am

Crazy question.
I have a Gateway LX6810 - 01
It has all the specs to run this (quad core processor, 8gb ram, more than enough hard drive space) but my question is if my video card is good enough to play this game.
I have an Nvidia GT 120 that does not show up on the list at all.

nVIDIA has continued to add to the complexity and power demands of their primary High End GPUs ever since they started making graphics chips, until they started really having trouble splitting out new Mainline and Low End cards from the newest generation. They have kept the old Geforce 8400 GS in production for over four years now, at least partly for that reason. The Geforce 8600 GT had been that generation's Mainline card, but it cost them too much compared to the cost of the Radeon HD 3650, so their price wasn't competitive. They also had cooling fan problems on all of the 8n00s, including the original 8400 GS. In order to avoid losing sales in the Gaming category, they developed a "between" card, the 8500 GT, to sell for less than the HD 3650, and not to be as bad as the 8400 GS.

The GT200 generation's lesser cards were very late, with an even more complicated GTX280 on top, so for an interim answer, they corrected the fan problems, and redesigned most of the 8n00s to use the newer, thinner 40 nm dies, giving them new 9n00 names. The 8600 GT became the 9500 GT, the 8500 GT became the 9400 GT, and various other renamed ones filled out the range from 9300 GS to 9800 GTX-plus. Some GT 200 lesser cards finally appeared, including a Low-Middle GT 240 with slower VRAM, and a better one with fast VRAM. The 9400 GT didn't sell well, and the GT 220 was held up at first, starting out too expensively.

The 8n00s were tapped once again for re-use, with the GT 120 having been the 9500 GT, the GT 130 having been the 9600 GSO, and I've forgotten the heredity of the GT 140. The GT 210 was released, for the Ultra Low End, with less performance than the poor 8400 GS, and the GT 220 finally was ready, replacing the 9500 GT and the GT 120 in the borderline area between Low End and Mainline. The GTX400 generation was very late coming, so various "300" renamings of GT200s had to be released, such as a 310, 320, etc.
User avatar
Marnesia Steele
 
Posts: 3398
Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2007 10:11 pm

Post » Sat May 26, 2012 9:27 pm

I bought a gts 450 and i am able to run the game on ultra @ 1080p with a very solid framerate, everything is maxed except shadows which are at medium, if anyone is looking for a cheap card i would def recomend the gts450.

the rest of my comp is pretty mediocore seeing as its is a pavilion and i havent upgraded anything except the power supply and GPU.
User avatar
RObert loVes MOmmy
 
Posts: 3432
Joined: Fri Dec 08, 2006 10:12 am

Post » Sun May 27, 2012 2:34 am

How well would this run Skyrim?:

  • AMD Quad-Core A8-3500M Accelerated Processor (2.4GHz/1.5GHz, 4MB L2 Cache)
  • 1GB GDDR5 Radeon HD 6750M Graphics
  • 6GB DDR3 System Memory (2 Dimm)
  • 640GB 5400 rpm Hard Drive
It's an HP Pavillion dv6z laptop I'm considering buying. Thanks :)

EDIT: IT would be Windows 7, of course, with a 1366x768 resolution btw
User avatar
Marguerite Dabrin
 
Posts: 3546
Joined: Tue Mar 20, 2007 11:33 am

Post » Sun May 27, 2012 7:24 am

How well would this run Skyrim?:

  • AMD Quad-Core A8-3500M Accelerated Processor (2.4GHz/1.5GHz, 4MB L2 Cache)
  • 1GB GDDR5 Radeon HD 6750M Graphics
  • 6GB DDR3 System Memory (2 Dimm)
  • 640GB 5400 rpm Hard Drive
It's an HP Pavillion dv6z laptop I'm considering buying. Thanks :)

EDIT: IT would be Windows 7, of course, with a 1366x768 resolution btw
Again it's a laptop, so there's no guarantees, but it should be able to run medium-high (you are CPU limited, and this game is heavily dependant on CPU). If you drop shadow details you should be able to run pretty well and up the other settings.
User avatar
Bitter End
 
Posts: 3418
Joined: Fri Sep 08, 2006 11:40 am

Post » Sat May 26, 2012 7:11 pm

Can my system run Skyrim?

-Lenovo Win7PC
-Inter® Pentium® CPU P6200 @ 2.13 GHz
-Intel HD Graphics
-4gb RAM
-1796 MB Total available graphics memory

Sorry I have no idea about computer specs etc.. i'm a complete noob
User avatar
quinnnn
 
Posts: 3503
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 1:11 pm

Post » Sat May 26, 2012 10:36 pm

Can my system run Skyrim?

-Lenovo Win7PC
-Inter® Pentium® CPU P6200 @ 2.13 GHz
-Intel HD Graphics
-4gb RAM
-1796 MB Total available graphics memory

Sorry I have no idea about computer specs etc.. i'm a complete noob
A real graphics card is required, and the minimum SHOULD BE a C2D, and none of the Pentiums are that good.

* Windows 7/Vista/XP PC (32 or 64 bit)
* Processor: Dual Core 2.0 GHz C2D or equivalent CPU
* 2GB System RAM
* 6GB free HDD Space
* Direct X 9 compliant video card with 512 MB of RAM (and
sufficient performance to actually put that VRAM to use)

* DirectX compatible sound card
* Internet access for Steam activation
User avatar
Manuel rivera
 
Posts: 3395
Joined: Mon Sep 10, 2007 4:12 pm

Post » Sat May 26, 2012 10:58 pm

A real graphics card is required, and the minimum SHOULD BE a C2D, and none of the Pentiums are that good.

* Windows 7/Vista/XP PC (32 or 64 bit)
* Processor: Dual Core 2.0 GHz C2D or equivalent CPU
* 2GB System RAM
* 6GB free HDD Space
* Direct X 9 compliant video card with 512 MB of RAM (and
sufficient performance to actually put that VRAM to use)

* DirectX compatible sound card
* Internet access for Steam activation

Thanks mate :D
ehh... it's just what you said there makes no sense to me. As i said before i don't understand specs... so is that a no like?
User avatar
Stephanie Nieves
 
Posts: 3407
Joined: Mon Apr 02, 2007 10:52 pm

Post » Sun May 27, 2012 2:57 am

There is a thread at large in the forum about running the game on substandard, below minimum hardware, and another about running without having a real graphics card, but the result is going to be a lack of smooth animation, along with a poor quality image. It won't be enjoyable when / if you get that poor system to try running Skyrim. Additionally, there have been a good many anecdotal reports of low quality systems with inadequate cooling being damaged by repeated overheating episodes when force to perform way above their design parameters. The HD series of video chips is for business graphics, routine web surfing, and very little else, and the same for Pentium CPUs.
User avatar
Kat Lehmann
 
Posts: 3409
Joined: Tue Jun 27, 2006 6:24 am

Post » Sun May 27, 2012 4:18 am

I've been looking to get a new rig and stumbled upon what looks like a fantastic rig for the price, but I was wondering what settings could it run Skyrim at and at what FPS? http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16883227370
User avatar
chloe hampson
 
Posts: 3493
Joined: Sun Jun 25, 2006 12:15 pm

Post » Sun May 27, 2012 5:31 am

I just want to add that with my rig I've stated at page 3, I managed to go with these settings also:

Anti-aliasing = off
Decal Quantity = medium
Distant Object Detail = Ultra
Reflect Land, Trees, Objects, Sky enabled
Actor, Item, Object, Grass, Light, Specularity Fade all at max
Object Detail Fade still enabled

And it's still 30 fps around the cities. ~40 when it's only me, my companion, and a few other enemies.

I don't think I can go for any anti-aliasing (I've got FXAA for that), but it's pretty impressive considering my "so 5 years ago" rig
User avatar
marie breen
 
Posts: 3388
Joined: Thu Aug 03, 2006 4:50 am

Post » Sun May 27, 2012 4:53 am

Hey all,

I've looked and the guide and it looks like I'm in pretty good standing for Skyrim, but I'm not the most tech-savvy person out there so if anyone can help me figure out how well I can actually run Skyrim, that'd be cool.
I'm looking to buy the game soon, but I've been worried as to whether or not my rig could run it. The CanYouRUNIt? site says I pass the minimum reqs overall, but a look at the in-depth thing shows that everything but my CPU passes the recommended requirements.

To my understanding, so long as you have a dual-core processor things should be pretty good right?

Here are my specs:
CPU: Pentium® Dual-Core 2.7 GHz
GPU: Radeon HD 5770
RAM: 6GB

Based on that information, does anyone know what quality I can set Skyrim to when I get it, without killing my framerate? Thanks! :)
User avatar
^_^
 
Posts: 3394
Joined: Thu May 31, 2007 12:01 am

Post » Sat May 26, 2012 6:40 pm

Actually, you only have a half-power type of CPU, gutted of almost all cache RAM to make it very cheap to produce and to sell. Performance with a Pentium Dual is very poor compared to even an AMD X2, a much older design. There was an old Pentium P4 with two CPUs in one package, but it was still worse than the one you have. I can't recall having heard of any "Atom" processors able to run at 2 GHz, but the official system requirements were apparently Pie in the Sky about that, and 2.3 GHz amounts to a more practical minimum for a full-power CPU.

It is my feeling that your CPU amounts to a bottleneck situation for an HD 5770, throttling it back, although how far, I can't guess. The more usual matchup to Pentium Dual processors is either a Low End business graphics card, or an Intel chipset video chip.
User avatar
ZzZz
 
Posts: 3396
Joined: Sat Jul 08, 2006 9:56 pm

Post » Sun May 27, 2012 3:49 am

Actually, you only have a half-power type of CPU, gutted of almost all cache RAM to make it very cheap to produce and to sell. Performance with a Pentium Dual is very poor compared to even an AMD X2, a much older design. There was an old Pentium P4 with two CPUs in one package, but it was still worse than the one you have. I can't recall having heard of any "Atom" processors able to run at 2 GHz, but the official system requirements were apparently Pie in the Sky about that, and 2.3 GHz amounts to a more practical minimum for a full-power CPU.

It is my feeling that your CPU amounts to a bottleneck situation for an HD 5770, throttling it back, although how far, I can't guess. The more usual matchup to Pentium Dual processors is either a Low End business graphics card, or an Intel chipset video chip.

Ooh, bottlenecking. If that is the case, I hope it doesn't hold back my GPU too far. It's a stock CPU, so I guess it's not surprising that it'll hold back a more powerful GPU.

Thanks for the help!
User avatar
Nick Pryce
 
Posts: 3386
Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2007 8:36 pm

Post » Sun May 27, 2012 7:46 am

Actually, with the right motherboard BIOSes, which are very seldom included in any readymade PC, the Pentium Dual has a very high overhead that allows overclocking to quite high speeds, which could make up for the missing cache, if it was available, but rather few game players would choose to put such a CPU into a good motherboard.
User avatar
Jessica Colville
 
Posts: 3349
Joined: Wed Oct 18, 2006 6:53 pm

Post » Sat May 26, 2012 11:47 pm

As it seems my last post was completely ignored, I am making another post.

I've heard this rig is a black Friday deal, and that the deal ends tonight. So I really need to know at what settings it could run Skyrim at on 1280x1024, once again here's the link - http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16883227370

Thanks :tes:
User avatar
Cat Haines
 
Posts: 3385
Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 9:27 am

Post » Sat May 26, 2012 8:59 pm

Okay I have 2 gigs of ram, a 512 MB radeon 5500 HD series and a 2.67 intel dual core and XP
can I run at low at 1920 by 1080
User avatar
GabiiE Liiziiouz
 
Posts: 3360
Joined: Mon Jan 22, 2007 3:20 am

Post » Sun May 27, 2012 6:31 am

As it seems my last post was completely ignored, I am making another post.

I've heard this rig is a black Friday deal, and that the deal ends tonight. So I really need to know at what settings it could run Skyrim at on 1280x1024, once again here's the link - http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16883227370

Sorry, but due to bandwidth limitations, I seldom chase links. I didn't exactly ignore you and your messages, only your links.

Okay I have 2 gigs of ram, a 512 MB radeon 5500 HD series and a 2.67 intel dual core and XP
can I run at low at 1920 by 1080

No way to answer based on such minimalist information. There have been half a dozen Intel CPUs that could meet that vague description, including a borderline, but below practical minimum Pentium Dual. There were two desktop HD 55x0 cards, and about four laptop HD 55x0 cards. You'll have to do better.
User avatar
Angel Torres
 
Posts: 3553
Joined: Thu Oct 25, 2007 7:08 am

Post » Sun May 27, 2012 7:51 am

Sorry, but due to bandwidth limitations, I seldom chase links. I didn't exactly ignore you and your messages, only your links.



No way to answer based on such minimalist information. There have been half a dozen Intel CPUs that could meet that vague description, including a borderline, but below practical minimum Pentium Dual. There were two desktop HD 55x0 cards, and about four laptop HD 55x0 cards. You'll have to do better.
it's a desktop and the exact CPU is E7300
I cannot find my GPU number though
User avatar
evelina c
 
Posts: 3377
Joined: Tue Dec 19, 2006 4:28 pm

Post » Sat May 26, 2012 4:25 pm

The C2D e7300 is well above the practical minimal CPU requirement. The HD 5550 is pretty weak sauce, although the game is easy on graphics cards, however, at 1920 by 1080, both of the desktop cards will struggle to provide good images, because they simply don't have the bandwidth for the number of pixels involved, although the HD 5570 has more speed, more texture units, and more fragment pipelines, allowing it to be more efficient.

The HD 5570 is rated as a "Budget" gaming card for Low Settings at MEDIUM resolutions. It may well slow down when there's too much information to display on too many pixels. The HD 5550 is certain to do so relatively frequently if forced to run with that High Resolution setting.

http://www.gpureview.com/show_cards.php?card1=630&card2=624

Both cards, at Medium Resolutions, given the low demands on image quality in the game, can probably provide Medium Quality settings, with the 5570 doing so more attractively.
User avatar
Nicole Mark
 
Posts: 3384
Joined: Wed Apr 25, 2007 7:33 pm

Post » Sat May 26, 2012 7:08 pm

Processor - Intel Core i5-2320 3.0GHz
RAM - 8 GB
Graphics Card - AMD Radeon HD 6770 1GB
1 TB hard drive and Windows 7

I think it'll run it just fine but I wanted to make sure before I bought it, like I said I'll be playing 1280x1024
User avatar
Tyrone Haywood
 
Posts: 3472
Joined: Sun Apr 29, 2007 7:10 am

Post » Sun May 27, 2012 6:09 am

Processor - Intel Core i5-2320 3.0GHz
RAM - 8 GB
Graphics Card - AMD Radeon HD 6770 1GB
1 TB hard drive and Windows 7

I think it'll run it just fine but I wanted to make sure before I bought it, like I said I'll be playing 1280x1024
I agree, it should be very good for the game, with High or even Ultra settings at that Medium resolution.
User avatar
Kate Schofield
 
Posts: 3556
Joined: Mon Sep 18, 2006 11:58 am

Post » Sat May 26, 2012 3:18 pm

Heya guys - just wondering if anyone can tell me how well I'll be able to play Skyrim with the PC i've just ordered in time for Christmas:

Intel? Core? i5-2500
ASUS? P8Z68-V LX
8GB SAMSUNG 1333MHz
1GB GEFORCE GTX 560 Ti

Thanks :)
User avatar
kat no x
 
Posts: 3247
Joined: Mon Apr 16, 2007 5:39 pm

Post » Sun May 27, 2012 3:40 am

Heya guys - just wondering if anyone can tell me how well I'll be able to play Skyrim with the PC i've just ordered in time for Christmas:

Intel? Core? i5-2500
ASUS? P8Z68-V LX
8GB SAMSUNG 1333MHz
1GB GEFORCE GTX 560 Ti

Thanks :)
Plenty fine.
User avatar
Lyndsey Bird
 
Posts: 3539
Joined: Sun Oct 22, 2006 2:57 am

PreviousNext

Return to V - Skyrim