He gave Fallout new vegas a 7.5.Never liked him and he gave fallout 3 a 9.5 hes biased and is a crap video game journalist.
Because he has a different opinion? He'd be a crappy journalist for giving false information or for lacking writing skills, not for his personal taste.
I happen to agree Fallout 3 is superior to New Vegas in atmosphere and lasting appeal. Although I'd probably give NV a higher score. But it's something very subjective and somewhat personal.
Anyway, back to the topic, why are you bashing this guy before we have any background info whatsoever. He obviously played Oblivion, so maybe the game doesn't make it clear enough you have contracted a disease this time around. Maybe he didn't even know he had fought a vampire in first place. Let's wait for more info before passing judgement. Now he's just annoyed he screw up, I would be too, if I were stuck and it's not like you search the internet for guidance.