Bernard Black
I don't know Globlob, had you been drinking?
I don't know Globlob, had you been drinking?
That's a funny name, hehe. Well I have been drinking my herb smoke. *shrug*
OOC: Edit: Added name.
64 posts
• Page 3 of 3 • 1, 2, 3
Werewolf: The Mists of Death - Day 3
» Sat May 12, 2012 9:21 pm
Gor'Badd Al' Chem'st
That's a funny name, hehe. Well I have been drinking my herb smoke. *shrug*
OOC: Edit: Added name.
-
Oyuki Manson Lavey - Posts: 3438
- Joined: Mon Aug 28, 2006 2:47 am
» Sat May 12, 2012 8:20 pm
Farm 2:
I Do Not Know
Undead Fiend
Suffca
Gamgee
Mr.E
Indicator
House 4:
GorbadPS3
I Do Not Know:
GorbadPS3
GorbadPS3:
ClintostheGreat
Gamgee
Mr.E
wolf bite
Undead Fiend
I Do Not Know
Suffca
Exorince
-
Emily Jeffs - Posts: 3335
- Joined: Thu Nov 02, 2006 10:27 pm
» Sun May 13, 2012 7:20 am
Gor'Badd Al' Chem'st
May I be so kind as to demand you show us all the evidence against me, all of you who are voting for having me executed.
May I be so kind as to demand you show us all the evidence against me, all of you who are voting for having me executed.
-
cosmo valerga - Posts: 3477
- Joined: Sat Oct 13, 2007 10:21 am
» Sun May 13, 2012 8:13 am
Gor'Badd Al' Chem'st
May I be so kind as to demand you show us all the evidence against me, all of you who are voting for having me executed.
May I be so kind as to demand you show us all the evidence against me, all of you who are voting for having me executed.
Jebediah
Sure thing. Here you are.
Jebediah
Since I know that I'm not a wolf, I think that Gor'badd is the most likely suspect.
He is slim, small, and weak. Which seems more inline with the struggle during the first kill.
He is smart, social and helpful, which would go well with his ability to trick Nate that he was supposed to be there. Also in his past "He fooled the ravens by cleaver means and managed to cheat his way high up in the ranks." It seems like he would be good at tricking someone.
Also, he hates guns, maybe that is why the kill today was with a knife, he some how convinced the arch to let him use a knife and kill stealthily after the fiasco with the first murder.
As for his ability to kill in just one strike, he does have poisons, it is possible that he poisoned his knife and killed Nate rather quickly.
Since I know that I'm not a wolf, I think that Gor'badd is the most likely suspect.
He is slim, small, and weak. Which seems more inline with the struggle during the first kill.
He is smart, social and helpful, which would go well with his ability to trick Nate that he was supposed to be there. Also in his past "He fooled the ravens by cleaver means and managed to cheat his way high up in the ranks." It seems like he would be good at tricking someone.
Also, he hates guns, maybe that is why the kill today was with a knife, he some how convinced the arch to let him use a knife and kill stealthily after the fiasco with the first murder.
As for his ability to kill in just one strike, he does have poisons, it is possible that he poisoned his knife and killed Nate rather quickly.
Consuela Salvatore
Si, Sam, I was thinking the same about the flophouse - it seems clear our furry does not stay there. That, plus the knife wound, leaves us with the 3 you list.
But I'm on Senor Clyde's side. If it was Nate that asked the question, I'm not sure the loner Clyde could diffuse the situation so easy. A smooth talker or quick thinker like Jebediah or Gor'badd would be more likely. There is another possibility, too - that one of the furries was surprised that the knife-holding furry was in there.
I will add my vote against Gor'badd. Jebediah has the start of a decent case, but he misses the largest strike against Gor'badd - the location of the knife wound. Nate was struck from behind in the left shoulder, which is most easily done with a downward motion... Of the left hand. Gor'badd's right side is wounded, so he would likely favor his left side as his weapon hand, while the other two suspects have no clear reason to do so.
Si, Sam, I was thinking the same about the flophouse - it seems clear our furry does not stay there. That, plus the knife wound, leaves us with the 3 you list.
But I'm on Senor Clyde's side. If it was Nate that asked the question, I'm not sure the loner Clyde could diffuse the situation so easy. A smooth talker or quick thinker like Jebediah or Gor'badd would be more likely. There is another possibility, too - that one of the furries was surprised that the knife-holding furry was in there.
I will add my vote against Gor'badd. Jebediah has the start of a decent case, but he misses the largest strike against Gor'badd - the location of the knife wound. Nate was struck from behind in the left shoulder, which is most easily done with a downward motion... Of the left hand. Gor'badd's right side is wounded, so he would likely favor his left side as his weapon hand, while the other two suspects have no clear reason to do so.
-
Davorah Katz - Posts: 3468
- Joined: Fri Dec 22, 2006 12:57 pm
» Sun May 13, 2012 3:26 am
Gor'Badd Al' Chem'st
Let me clear out a few things:
Yes, I am weak. Why then would I even have gone up against a strong hunter in the first place?
As for tricking someone, you are also known to be a lier Jebediah. I left behind my criminal life ages ago. Why I would need to trick someone who "had a neutral expression on his face, apparently didn't see the killer" is not really a convincing argument.
Yes, I hate guns. Mainly because I got this life-long wound from one, which hasn't healed properly. I do, however, not seek a vendetta against someone I barely know, just because they happen to be carrying a load of guns.
You mention an Arch.... What on earth are you talking about? Do you perhaps know something of these wolves we others do not? Maybe because you are one yourself, Jebediah?
As for my poisons.. I haven't used those in ages. And even then, they aren't to be applied on a weapon to strike with, they are meant to be eaten or drank.
As Consuela pointed out, the knife leaves more than one of us as suspects, even when applying the logic of the knife-wielding wolf living outside the flophouse itself, which we cannot possibly think is 100% surely true.
And as Consuela pointed out also, the "hey, what are you doing in here" is not 100% surely the victim speaking to the murderer. It may be a wolf to a wolf, which is my theory.
The only-I repeat, only true indicator against me is a stab wound on the left side. Anyone could strike someone on the left side. And don't forget: the wound is deep. My flower-cutting butter-knife couldn't do such damage even if a bear was swinging it.
So, I'll repeat my evidence against Jim Jackson:
Jim Jackson steps in if things gets out of control. Cool headed when under pressure.
This fits both of these murders. One of the wolves was struggling to kill the hunter, so Jim acted cool headedly and took control of the situation. Shot two times with no lethal efficiency and then returned to the flophouse for the night, as the tracks show. This day, he chose to make a stealthy, calculated kill with his knife. One of the other wolves most likely asked him or he asked them "what are you doing here", just before the kill. It is the only way to explain everything that has happened so far. By executing me, you will be killing an innocent man when you focused on small details that fits over fourth of us, while missing the large picture of everything we know so far that points towards Jim Jackson.
Let me clear out a few things:
Yes, I am weak. Why then would I even have gone up against a strong hunter in the first place?
As for tricking someone, you are also known to be a lier Jebediah. I left behind my criminal life ages ago. Why I would need to trick someone who "had a neutral expression on his face, apparently didn't see the killer" is not really a convincing argument.
Yes, I hate guns. Mainly because I got this life-long wound from one, which hasn't healed properly. I do, however, not seek a vendetta against someone I barely know, just because they happen to be carrying a load of guns.
You mention an Arch.... What on earth are you talking about? Do you perhaps know something of these wolves we others do not? Maybe because you are one yourself, Jebediah?
As for my poisons.. I haven't used those in ages. And even then, they aren't to be applied on a weapon to strike with, they are meant to be eaten or drank.
As Consuela pointed out, the knife leaves more than one of us as suspects, even when applying the logic of the knife-wielding wolf living outside the flophouse itself, which we cannot possibly think is 100% surely true.
And as Consuela pointed out also, the "hey, what are you doing in here" is not 100% surely the victim speaking to the murderer. It may be a wolf to a wolf, which is my theory.
The only-I repeat, only true indicator against me is a stab wound on the left side. Anyone could strike someone on the left side. And don't forget: the wound is deep. My flower-cutting butter-knife couldn't do such damage even if a bear was swinging it.
So, I'll repeat my evidence against Jim Jackson:
Jim Jackson steps in if things gets out of control. Cool headed when under pressure.
This fits both of these murders. One of the wolves was struggling to kill the hunter, so Jim acted cool headedly and took control of the situation. Shot two times with no lethal efficiency and then returned to the flophouse for the night, as the tracks show. This day, he chose to make a stealthy, calculated kill with his knife. One of the other wolves most likely asked him or he asked them "what are you doing here", just before the kill. It is the only way to explain everything that has happened so far. By executing me, you will be killing an innocent man when you focused on small details that fits over fourth of us, while missing the large picture of everything we know so far that points towards Jim Jackson.
-
rheanna bruining - Posts: 3415
- Joined: Fri Dec 22, 2006 11:00 am
» Sun May 13, 2012 6:27 am
Sarah Dawson
Places a comforting hand on Gor'Badd's shoulder
Oh, you poor, poor man. I'll vote for Gor'Badd. There's no room for risks here.
I guess I'll follow the herd to Farm 2 as well.
Places a comforting hand on Gor'Badd's shoulder
Oh, you poor, poor man. I'll vote for Gor'Badd. There's no room for risks here.
I guess I'll follow the herd to Farm 2 as well.
-
Imy Davies - Posts: 3479
- Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2006 6:42 pm
» Sun May 13, 2012 5:16 am
Consuela Salvatore
There is a large flaw in your accusation of Senor Jackson, Senor Al'Chem'st: It relies on Senor Ellington, or another special individual, being a liar. Most of our people have spoken already today, and none admit to being out of bed by the flophouse, so I think Ellington's account must be spoken to a wolf, not an angel or sneak.
(OOC: Innocents will usually always stay in their beds at night, while some good roles - angels and sneaks - will sometimes be out of bed in the night, just as the wolves are. In this game, we do not know how many people have roles, or what their roles entail, so we cannot be sure. Hopefully this aside explains the above paragraph for our newer players.)
If Senor Ellington lied about what he heard, it means that he is not an innocent - else there is no reason for the fabrication. That would make him, in all likelihood, a wolf. But since (1) he sleeps in the flophouse, and (2) we noticed only one set of tracks going to the flophouse, and thus only one furry lives there, and (3) Senor Ellington does not have a blade to make today's kill... Senors Ellington and Jackson cannot BOTH be wolves, si. Comprende? Maybe not. But it makes sense to me.
There is a large flaw in your accusation of Senor Jackson, Senor Al'Chem'st: It relies on Senor Ellington, or another special individual, being a liar. Most of our people have spoken already today, and none admit to being out of bed by the flophouse, so I think Ellington's account must be spoken to a wolf, not an angel or sneak.
(OOC: Innocents will usually always stay in their beds at night, while some good roles - angels and sneaks - will sometimes be out of bed in the night, just as the wolves are. In this game, we do not know how many people have roles, or what their roles entail, so we cannot be sure. Hopefully this aside explains the above paragraph for our newer players.)
If Senor Ellington lied about what he heard, it means that he is not an innocent - else there is no reason for the fabrication. That would make him, in all likelihood, a wolf. But since (1) he sleeps in the flophouse, and (2) we noticed only one set of tracks going to the flophouse, and thus only one furry lives there, and (3) Senor Ellington does not have a blade to make today's kill... Senors Ellington and Jackson cannot BOTH be wolves, si. Comprende? Maybe not. But it makes sense to me.
-
Robert DeLarosa - Posts: 3415
- Joined: Tue Sep 04, 2007 3:43 pm
» Sun May 13, 2012 11:45 am
Gor'Badd Al' Chem'st
Edit: Most likely against the rules, so nevermind.
Edit#2:
My theory against Jim Jackson is 100% water-proof. The hearing of voices can, as you said earlier Consuela, be a conversation between two of the wolves. It makes perfect sense.
Edit: Most likely against the rules, so nevermind.
Edit#2:
My theory against Jim Jackson is 100% water-proof. The hearing of voices can, as you said earlier Consuela, be a conversation between two of the wolves. It makes perfect sense.
-
Joe Bonney - Posts: 3466
- Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 12:00 pm
» Sun May 13, 2012 12:29 am
Charles Lambert
________________
Was their any signs of struggle on the body? for all we know the werewolf could have drugged him while human
________________
Was their any signs of struggle on the body? for all we know the werewolf could have drugged him while human
-
James Potter - Posts: 3418
- Joined: Sat Jul 07, 2007 11:40 am
» Sun May 13, 2012 12:48 am
Gor'Badd Al' Chem'st
I trust the people of this town make the right decision. I'm no wolf and killing me only going to make us even fewer who fight the wolves.
I trust the people of this town make the right decision. I'm no wolf and killing me only going to make us even fewer who fight the wolves.
-
Svenja Hedrich - Posts: 3496
- Joined: Mon Apr 23, 2007 3:18 pm
» Sun May 13, 2012 4:27 am
Charles Lambert
________________
Was their any signs of struggle on the body? for all we know the werewolf could have drugged him while human
________________
Was their any signs of struggle on the body? for all we know the werewolf could have drugged him while human
OOC: You need to bold and redden the questions directed at the host, otherwise he is going to miss them and not answer it.
-
Leah - Posts: 3358
- Joined: Wed Nov 01, 2006 3:11 pm
» Sun May 13, 2012 9:56 am
OOC: About 40 minutes. I still need some role PMs. You know who you are.
-
Nicola - Posts: 3365
- Joined: Wed Jul 19, 2006 7:57 am
» Sun May 13, 2012 8:57 am
Jim Jackson
Is there anything taken from the body? What is the angle of the wound?
If Gor'badd does turn out to be innocent, I think we should take a closer look at Glenn Matthews and Mike Franks.
I'll tell you why, after things play out.
Is there anything taken from the body? What is the angle of the wound?
If Gor'badd does turn out to be innocent, I think we should take a closer look at Glenn Matthews and Mike Franks.
I'll tell you why, after things play out.
-
Emilie Joseph - Posts: 3387
- Joined: Thu Mar 15, 2007 6:28 am
» Sat May 12, 2012 11:09 pm
Jim Jackson
Is there anything taken from the body? What is the angle of the wound?
If Gor'badd does turn out to be innocent, I think we should take a closer look at Glenn Matthews and Mike Franks.
I'll tell you why, after things play out.
Is there anything taken from the body? What is the angle of the wound?
If Gor'badd does turn out to be innocent, I think we should take a closer look at Glenn Matthews and Mike Franks.
I'll tell you why, after things play out.
Aces
Nothing was taken. I don't know about angles and stuff. Why are you always asking me about these things?
OOC: Day over.
-
Ana Torrecilla Cabeza - Posts: 3427
- Joined: Wed Jun 28, 2006 6:15 pm
64 posts
• Page 3 of 3 • 1, 2, 3