What, we are in one of those threads now? You don't say. Please, knock of the condescending attitude.

So you are saying you have never seen a single member make a post saying Capcom likes to milk out franchises? Or likes to employ unsavory business practices? Or gouges the hell out of DLC prices?

That's a bad business attitude. There's really no reason why a game not like COD cant beat COD sales

I never claimed that this is the early 90s, if that's what you thought then you missed the point. I was merely pointed out that Capcom have a very long and rich history when it comes to milking complaints. People complained about Capcom and their Mega Man milking in the early 90s, and then about their Street Fighter milking and now about their Resident Evil milking with all their Resident Evil spin-off games.

That is true, there's relatively little discussion on this forum when it comes to japanese games, and the discussion that do pop up here is usually about JRPGs in the JRPG thread and not the Capcom games. But if you do look at places that do discuss them, then you will see plenty.

Where was the condescending attitude exactly?

Please re~read what I actually said and what you have said.

You are trying to point light at singular posts, posts, about Capcom. I said entire threads. There's a hefty difference.

While we're at it, I did five seconds of research on this versy site:

Searched "Activision milking" and got 20 some threads.

Searched "Capcom milking" and got 3.

One of which Activision was part of.

Your second quote reply is the point I was leaning to.

Well than it's a good thing you're not in charge.

Except these threads aren't as common as you make them appear to be. And what has this discussion already gone too in this thread? Capcom, and other developers/publishers. Many of these types of threads on Community Discussion will end up with Activision, EA, and Capcom at the center of attention.

While we're at it, I did five seconds of research on this very site:

Searched "Activision milking" and got 20 some threads.

Searched "Capcom milking" and got 3.

One of which Activision was part of.

Searched "Activsion" and got 20 pages of threads.

Searched "Capcom" and got 8 pages of threads.

Doesn't show a lot of balance, does it?

I'll even do more than 5 seconds of research from this thread: http://www.gamesas.com/topic/1386653-best-and-worst-gaming-companies/page__hl__activision%20milking

Activision is mentioned 13 times in 30 posts (first page only).

Capcom is mentioned 3 times in 30 posts (first page only).

It seems Activision being blamed is fairly common and Capcom being blamed is fairly uncommon.

Not yet. I'm working on it. Don't even wanna be in charge just wanna be a mover. Hoping internet doesn't get commercialized/censored.

As a trained social scientist (I don't get to say that very often), I'd just like to point out that the scope of your research is too small to fully support the conclusions you're trying to draw...

Not to mention that the sample he does have is biased towards western products to start with.

I blame the company to the extent that what they're doing is, in my view anyway, strangling innovation in the industry. Neglecting older and/or acquired titles so the quality declines and they can eventually cancel them when the sales drop off, treating single player modes as a complete afterthought so they don't have to bother putting any effort into creating a compelling story, relying on giving a few star titles a fresh coat of paint every year and re-releasing them, the overall homogenation of game offerings coming out these days.

What's the point in another developer even trying to take a risk to produce something totally new and different? Such a move would actually be a dumb one; the future is clearly in just rehashing old titles and re-releasing them. I hate to see a future where new gamers aren't even aware that there once were other things to play besides CoD and Angry Birds and the rest of it. They're going to miss out on a lot of really great stuff.