Why won't there be an add-on to continue the game after you

Post » Tue Dec 21, 2010 7:03 pm

If you want to play past the ending just down load one of the mods that enables it.
User avatar
Chris Johnston
 
Posts: 3392
Joined: Fri Jul 07, 2006 12:40 pm

Post » Tue Dec 21, 2010 10:12 pm

No one is saying they wouldn't like a post MQ DLC (but I'm sure some people would) that would make all the decisions matter and work, but the chances that a post MQ DLC will due justice to the MQ is pretty low.
User avatar
Jason Rice
 
Posts: 3445
Joined: Thu Aug 16, 2007 3:42 pm

Post » Wed Dec 22, 2010 4:41 am

C'mon, think about it. With the sole exception of using Lanius's gear (and exploring his camp a little more carefully, I guess, though there's nothing there), there is not a single thing you could do after the game ends that you couldn't do before. Nothing. At all.

Why does everyone say that you could do lots let us run the lucky 38 (independent) or rebuild the damn an charge for power (Legion) or hunt down the legion(NCR) they can make it have one of three cont. quests according to who you sided with in main game I would welcome a dlc like this my biggest disappointment was taking new vegas for myself and then being able to control nothing at all i wanted to run that place man lol
User avatar
Wayne Cole
 
Posts: 3369
Joined: Sat May 26, 2007 5:22 am

Post » Tue Dec 21, 2010 5:13 pm

To long didn't read, but the unicorn idea sounds like the best thing out of this entire topic. Buy it, print it, and sell it we need more unicorn laser stuff! (oh and the rainbows to, make that 2)

I literaly lol'ed.
User avatar
Jordan Moreno
 
Posts: 3462
Joined: Thu May 10, 2007 4:47 pm

Post » Wed Dec 22, 2010 12:41 am

Why does everyone say that you could do lots let us run the lucky 38 (independent) or rebuild the damn an charge for power (Legion) or hunt down the legion(NCR) they can make it have one of three cont. quests according to who you sided with in main game I would welcome a dlc like this my biggest disappointment was taking new vegas for myself and then being able to control nothing at all i wanted to run that place man lol


There is a mod that lets you run the Lucky38.

Bob
User avatar
Tammie Flint
 
Posts: 3336
Joined: Mon Aug 14, 2006 12:12 am

Post » Wed Dec 22, 2010 5:51 am

I can't play the first DLC because I'm stuck at the end point. I'm really angry about this, because I had almost 200 hours of gameplay. The next DLC will come back in the Mojave? Thanks.
User avatar
Micah Judaeah
 
Posts: 3443
Joined: Tue Oct 24, 2006 6:22 pm

Post » Tue Dec 21, 2010 7:38 pm

I can't play the first DLC because I'm stuck at the end point. I'm really angry about this, because I had almost 200 hours of gameplay. The next DLC will come back in the Mojave? Thanks.

No DLC will allow you to go back to the Mojave or to the DLC area if you're at the final quest at the Dam or the Legate's Camp.
You only have yourself to blame for not keeping multiple saves and listening to the pop up before the final quest.
Besides, it's an RPG, it's about trying out different characters, so go roleplay as something opposite to your current character.
User avatar
Lakyn Ellery
 
Posts: 3447
Joined: Sat Jan 27, 2007 1:02 pm

Post » Tue Dec 21, 2010 10:36 pm

No DLC will allow you to go back to the Mojave or to the DLC area if you're at the final quest at the Dam or the Legate's Camp.
You only have yourself to blame for not keeping multiple saves and listening to the pop up before the final quest.
Besides, it's an RPG, it's about trying out different characters, so go roleplay as something opposite to your current character.


OMG! Thanks for the reply. I must restart all :(
User avatar
Andrew
 
Posts: 3521
Joined: Tue May 08, 2007 1:44 am

Post » Wed Dec 22, 2010 1:46 am

OMG! Thanks for the reply. I must restart all :(

Join Legion this time. :deal:
User avatar
Life long Observer
 
Posts: 3476
Joined: Fri Sep 08, 2006 7:07 pm

Post » Wed Dec 22, 2010 12:29 am

The subject that won't die..QQ. While there may be SOME people that would be interested in a broken steel dlc for Vegas, there seem to be a lot more that aren't interested. I like that there is an end. If you really want to keep going, there are mods for that. I would rather they spent the time/money making something new and interesting, rather than something that I can do all by my lonesome by simply not going to the dam. I am now on my 5th character and I really do not see what the big deal is about either making a new one if you somehow managed not to save before going to the dam. It's not like it would take as long on a second play through, besides you might enjoy supporting a different faction. So can we just stop beating the broken steel horse already?
User avatar
Helen Quill
 
Posts: 3334
Joined: Fri Oct 13, 2006 1:12 pm

Post » Tue Dec 21, 2010 10:23 pm

I would love a broken steel dlc for nv. I know ppl say nv has different endings which is all good but why then is broken steel rated one of the best dlc's?
User avatar
Megan Stabler
 
Posts: 3420
Joined: Mon Sep 18, 2006 2:03 pm

Post » Wed Dec 22, 2010 7:27 am

I would love a broken steel dlc for nv. I know ppl say nv has different endings which is all good but why then is broken steel rated one of the best dlc's?


Broken Steel was well received because it fixed the massive plothole and copout that was Fallout 3 ending. Two different companions that are immune to radiation and we cannot tell them to start the project just because someone HAS to die? Really? One of them being immune to radiation was a damn PLOTPOINT two missions before the ending and dev team convienently ignored the whole thing. The ending was simply illogical forced drama that had almost no effect to the outside world. A couple of water caravans was enough to incorporate the new ending since there were pretty much no sidequests that had anything to do with the plotline of the mainquest and didnt need to be removed or modified.

New Vegas ending on the other hand HAS an effect on the Mojave wasteland. Incorporating the endings into post-end gameplay would take a lot of work. Also a huge chunk of NV sidequests are somehow linked to NCR vs Legion plotline and would become illogical if player was allowed to continue. Boone's sidequest? Gannon's sidequest? Half of Strip sidequests? Pretty much every NCR/Legion sidequest? They all would be illogical after the ending and would have to be removed or HEAVILY modified to make any sense. If player was allowed to continue after the ending, so much content would be removed that there wouldn't be much to do for anymore. It is one of the drawbacks of making sidequests interwine with other events but in my opinion it's still better than having the sidequests exist in vacuum like in Fallout 3.

In short Broken Steel fixed Fallout 3's broken ending while New Vegas ending isn't broken and therefore doesn't need fixing.
User avatar
Marie
 
Posts: 3405
Joined: Thu Jun 29, 2006 12:05 am

Post » Tue Dec 21, 2010 10:00 pm

No DLC will allow you to go back to the Mojave or to the DLC area if you're at the final quest at the Dam or the Legate's Camp.
You only have yourself to blame for not keeping multiple saves and listening to the pop up before the final quest.
Besides, it's an RPG, it's about trying out different characters, so go roleplay as something opposite to your current character.


I am using a mod that lets me return to Sierra Madre. I finally have a use for the pre-war money.

Bob
User avatar
Rhiannon Jones
 
Posts: 3423
Joined: Thu Sep 21, 2006 3:18 pm

Post » Tue Dec 21, 2010 10:40 pm


To be honest, this is the only gaming community that I've ever seen complain about endings-why is that?


That's not true. There have also been complaints on the STALKER forums about the end of some of the STALKER games. Those games also lend themselves to open play and fortunately, they also allow mods to allow free play after the end of the game.

Bob
User avatar
Nick Pryce
 
Posts: 3386
Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2007 8:36 pm

Post » Tue Dec 21, 2010 8:26 pm

I would love a broken steel dlc for nv. I know ppl say nv has different endings which is all good but why then is broken steel rated one of the best dlc's?

Because there was only one possible ending for Fallout 3, sure you could pick who to sacrifice but it hardly altered the ending...that made it easy to make a dlc that continued the game because they didn't have to take into account the dozens of actions the player could have taken. FO3 was fun but extremely linear, New Vegas takes into account the plethora of actions you've taken and thats why a DLC that continues the story is not going to happen.
User avatar
Sweets Sweets
 
Posts: 3339
Joined: Tue Jun 13, 2006 3:26 am

Post » Wed Dec 22, 2010 3:17 am

Because there was only one possible ending for Fallout 3, sure you could pick who to sacrifice but it hardly altered the ending...that made it easy to make a dlc that continued the game because they didn't have to take into account the dozens of actions the player could have taken. FO3 was fun but extremely linear, New Vegas takes into account the plethora of actions you've taken and thats why a DLC that continues the story is not going to happen.


You could have sided with the Enclave.

Bob
User avatar
Lily Something
 
Posts: 3327
Joined: Thu Jun 15, 2006 12:21 pm

Post » Wed Dec 22, 2010 6:13 am

We really need a sticky thread to stop over debated topics.

Even though nobody would read it, but it would help to just provde a link to a thread that has all the problems, arguments, and repercussions of said ideas and not have to rewrite them each week.
User avatar
jenny goodwin
 
Posts: 3461
Joined: Wed Sep 13, 2006 4:57 am

Post » Wed Dec 22, 2010 12:30 am

4 possible endings
4 new after main quest possible world
A lot of memory would be needed.
User avatar
Adam Baumgartner
 
Posts: 3344
Joined: Wed May 30, 2007 12:12 pm

Post » Wed Dec 22, 2010 6:29 am

We really need a sticky thread to stop over debated topics.

Even though nobody would read it, but it would help to just provde a link to a thread that has all the problems, arguments, and repercussions of said ideas and not have to rewrite them each week.

What I fail to understand is if people want the game to go on or want to return to a place that is not possible with the vanilla game why not just download the MOD. And for those XBOX and the PS3 users - they need to contact their particular networks and get them to allow the posting of MODs because, according to Bethesda, there should be no problem getting them to work on those platforms. Indeed, it may now be possible for mods to be used on the XBOX 360 using a USB Key and there are methods posted on the net for getting them to the PS3, though both of those appear to be somewhat messy.

Bob
User avatar
Antonio Gigliotta
 
Posts: 3439
Joined: Fri Jul 06, 2007 1:39 pm

Post » Wed Dec 22, 2010 2:47 am

You could have sided with the Enclave.

Bob

It didn't really make any difference, basically it said it killed everyone in the wasteland besides pure humans and then after the Broken Steel DLC there was no real visible effect...same as if you chose to sacrifice yourself there was no real point because you woke up. Broken Steel basically nullified all of the decisions you made in FO3's end game in favor of letting you play on. Basically that serves as a perfect reason NOT to half ass it and make a DLC to play on after the game ends in NV.
User avatar
REVLUTIN
 
Posts: 3498
Joined: Tue Dec 26, 2006 8:44 pm

Post » Wed Dec 22, 2010 9:45 am

What I fail to understand is if people want the game to go on or want to return to a place that is not possible with the vanilla game why not just download the MOD. And for those XBOX and the PS3 users - they need to contact their particular networks and get them to allow the posting of MODs because, according to Bethesda, there should be no problem getting them to work on those platforms. Indeed, it may now be possible for mods to be used on the XBOX 360 using a USB Key and there are methods posted on the net for getting them to the PS3, though both of those appear to be somewhat messy.

Bob

Unless a mass boycott by most users was created it wouldn't happen besides most of the market they care about would not be motivated enough or care enough if we sit down and explained to them.

Would take a lot of advertising of this idea.
User avatar
Krista Belle Davis
 
Posts: 3405
Joined: Tue Aug 22, 2006 3:00 am

Post » Wed Dec 22, 2010 6:00 am

Unless a mass boycott by most users was created it wouldn't happen besides most of the market they care about would not be motivated enough or care enough if we sit down and explained to them.

Would take a lot of advertising of this idea.

That's really too bad as it adds an enormous amount of replay value

Bob
User avatar
Rachyroo
 
Posts: 3415
Joined: Tue Jun 20, 2006 11:23 pm

Post » Tue Dec 21, 2010 7:11 pm

You could have sided with the Enclave.

Bob


Yeah, but they won't side with you.
User avatar
REVLUTIN
 
Posts: 3498
Joined: Tue Dec 26, 2006 8:44 pm

Post » Wed Dec 22, 2010 6:02 am

Because there was only one possible ending for Fallout 3, sure you could pick who to sacrifice but it hardly altered the ending...that made it easy to make a dlc that continued the game because they didn't have to take into account the dozens of actions the player could have taken. FO3 was fun but extremely linear, New Vegas takes into account the plethora of actions you've taken and thats why a DLC that continues the story is not going to happen.

User avatar
Rachell Katherine
 
Posts: 3380
Joined: Wed Oct 11, 2006 5:21 pm

Post » Wed Dec 22, 2010 8:45 am

Yes it would be easier than one for nv but very possible.I know it would would be a big dlc but a dlc I would be willing to buy.maybe the demand is not there but I think it would be great
User avatar
Emily Jones
 
Posts: 3425
Joined: Mon Jul 17, 2006 3:33 pm

PreviousNext

Return to Fallout: New Vegas