Anyone run into the sixual content yet?

Post » Thu Jun 07, 2012 6:25 pm

I watched two bears going at it.
User avatar
Rudi Carter
 
Posts: 3365
Joined: Fri Sep 01, 2006 11:09 pm

Post » Thu Jun 07, 2012 11:13 am

I watched two bears going at it.
Idunno which is more disturbing, two bears "going at it" or watching them. =p
User avatar
Arrogant SId
 
Posts: 3366
Joined: Sat May 19, 2007 11:39 am

Post » Thu Jun 07, 2012 6:34 pm

you won't find any boobies in skyrim, get over with it.
you will need witcher 2 for those.
User avatar
Klaire
 
Posts: 3405
Joined: Wed Sep 27, 2006 7:56 am

Post » Thu Jun 07, 2012 4:49 pm

you won't find any boobies in skyrim, get over with it.
you will need witcher 2 for those.
Dibella disagrees. However, they're stone.
User avatar
Ana
 
Posts: 3445
Joined: Sat Jul 01, 2006 4:29 am

Post » Thu Jun 07, 2012 11:57 am

Idunno which is more disturbing, two bears "going at it" or watching them. =p
Ha, I suggest the watching part (a joke), since two bears together is natural :smile:.
User avatar
Syaza Ramali
 
Posts: 3466
Joined: Wed Jan 24, 2007 10:46 am

Post » Thu Jun 07, 2012 10:30 am

Ha, I suggest the watching part (a joke), since two bears together is natural :smile:.
Good point I guess. o.o;
User avatar
Becky Cox
 
Posts: 3389
Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2006 8:38 am

Post » Fri Jun 08, 2012 12:53 am

Idunno which is more disturbing, two bears "going at it" or watching them. =p

depends on the reasons for watching them and where the hands are whilst watching. That combination is called bestial mastvrbation.
User avatar
Saul C
 
Posts: 3405
Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2007 12:41 pm

Post » Fri Jun 08, 2012 12:47 am

I would gladly swap the top piece of their underwear with something more plausible, like some roman two piece costume.

A http://redsbragbook.livejournal.com/8518.html maybe?

unfortunately, most modders seems concentrated in turning every humanoid female into a [censored] :dry:

Whoa, what's with the judging of women with certain body types or clothing choices? Stripperific armor doesn't fit so well(at all, actually) into the game, but TBH, the game could use more body types in general, for both males and females. Here's hoping some talented modder will take that on at some point...
User avatar
josh evans
 
Posts: 3471
Joined: Mon Jun 04, 2007 1:37 am

Post » Fri Jun 08, 2012 1:05 am

If anything, I'd like more sixual content.
User avatar
Max Van Morrison
 
Posts: 3503
Joined: Sat Jul 07, 2007 4:48 pm

Post » Thu Jun 07, 2012 9:29 pm

Seems whenever something related to the ESRB rating is brought up, it always gets derailed into people complaining about American culture.
User avatar
Soku Nyorah
 
Posts: 3413
Joined: Tue Oct 17, 2006 1:25 pm

Post » Thu Jun 07, 2012 8:41 am

It's interesting to note that the Dibella statues have features that the ingame humanoid meshes doesn't have since this time they're perfectly smooth as a Barbie doll. :dry:

I'm not interested in having every female NPC in Skyrim turned into a Playboy playmate (see the CBBE body...) or running around in bikini armor but I would gladly swap the top piece of their underwear with something more plausible, like some roman two piece costume. I don't have anymore the time needed to mod this stuff by myself and, unfortunately, most modders seems concentrated in turning every humanoid female into a [censored] :dry:

Right... and the only reason they don't have to do it with the males is because that's the default in the game. As I've said, Beth has always had terrible aesthetics.

As EomanV states in his description of his (or her, perhaps...) port of his/her Shojo Race mod for FONV, s/he grew up in East Asia with anime, manga, and similar entertainment, so why should s/he be forced to have a horrible PC simply for the sake of someone's perception of "realistic"?

Funny, but people seem to forget that there are a very wide diversity of female forms, and just because someone has a beautiful body doesn't mean that they are a centerfold (and centerfolds have been universally positive about their experience, so one might ask why someone else has an issue or assumes that such an act is negative?) Also, the CBBE is a very biased few of what people want for their characters (i.e., it's far too "hefty" for my fairy nature spirit characters... or even for Bretons, in general). We need a port of the Type 3 slim and the Shojo Race mods from FO.

Then again, diverse views about what is "proper" is why, as one person posted, pics of the Finnish Parliment are not allowed here due to TOS.

So much for a game that offers the player choice... only with mods, but even that depends on modders offering actual choice.
User avatar
Danel
 
Posts: 3417
Joined: Tue Feb 27, 2007 8:35 pm

Post » Thu Jun 07, 2012 7:22 pm

A http://redsbragbook.livejournal.com/8518.html maybe?



Whoa, what's with the judging of women with certain body types or clothing choices? Stripperific armor doesn't fit so well(at all, actually) into the game, but TBH, the game could use more body types in general, for both males and females. Here's hoping some talented modder will take that on at some point...


i want my character to be fat and smelly.
User avatar
Leticia Hernandez
 
Posts: 3426
Joined: Tue Oct 23, 2007 9:46 am

Post » Thu Jun 07, 2012 11:49 pm

Ha, I suggest the watching part (a joke), since two bears together is natural :smile:.

I'd suggest reconsidering what is assumed/perceived to be "natural" or "normal." That's what leads to stereotypes and discrimination, after all.

For example, consider Thomas Beatie and his wife, Nancy, and the general rejection of him when he announced his first pregnancy. There is an excellent editorial in Nature magazine from 2008 that discusses the problems with assuming that certain things are "natural" while others are not.
User avatar
Andrea Pratt
 
Posts: 3396
Joined: Mon Jul 31, 2006 4:49 am

Post » Thu Jun 07, 2012 8:40 am

Dibella disagrees. However, they're stone.

she has no nipbles tho, kinda auto-censored
User avatar
Suzy Santana
 
Posts: 3572
Joined: Fri Aug 10, 2007 12:02 am

Post » Thu Jun 07, 2012 4:21 pm

i want my character to be fat and smelly.

I wouldn't mind making a fat and smelly character. It's always nice to have diversity.
User avatar
Lori Joe
 
Posts: 3539
Joined: Tue Jun 20, 2006 6:10 am

Post » Thu Jun 07, 2012 5:18 pm

Governments and companies buy the guns. Correct me if I'm wrong, but it's not common to see TV ads in the US going "Get a Colt Assault Rifle! Buy 12, get 10% off!" Even with such a percentage of citizens being armed, the local and foreign governments are still the biggest customers. The culture that glorifies weapons is partly there to justify the government expenditure to arms research.

That depends, in part, on which channels you watch. I've seen commercials for the Henry firearms company a few times.

As for the gun culture, I think you're a bit off. The US has had a thing for it's guns since nearly the beginning. The Second Amendmant, which guarantees the right to keep and bear arms, was adopted back in 1791. Heck, the first shots of the US Revolutionary War were fired against British troops trying to sieze the arsenal at Condord. Then there's the old wild west, with the cowboys and indians, outlaws and desperados, and the quick-draws. No, the US has loved it's guns for a very long time. It has nothing to do with the government.
User avatar
Richard Dixon
 
Posts: 3461
Joined: Thu Jun 07, 2007 1:29 pm

Post » Thu Jun 07, 2012 4:25 pm

I'd suggest reconsidering what is assumed/perceived to be "natural" or "normal." That's what leads to stereotypes and discrimination, after all.

For example, consider Thomas Beatie and his wife, Nancy, and the general rejection of him when he announced his first pregnancy. There is an excellent editorial in Nature magazine from 2008 that discusses the problems with assuming that certain things are "natural" while others are not.

On normalcy and a possible mind-[censored] for some people:

There are women, who look like women, walk, talk and behave like women, have all the external equipment associated with that, were born like that, and yet are genetically male. The only difference is that they have no cervix or uterus, and have internal male gonads(stupid autocensor) instead of ovaries. The condition is called Complete Androgen Insensitivity Syndrome. These women might even look more feminine than genetically female women, since their body doesn't use androgens at all, so they tend to have very little extra body hair etc. Think about that when you next talk to a woman you fancy. :devil:
User avatar
Ellie English
 
Posts: 3457
Joined: Tue Jul 11, 2006 4:47 pm

Post » Thu Jun 07, 2012 10:52 am

On normalcy and a possible mind-[censored] for some people:

There are women, who look like women, walk, talk and behave like women, have all the external equipment associated with that, were born like that, and yet are genetically male. The only difference is that they have no cervix or uterus, and have internal male gonads(stupid autosensor) instead of ovaries. The condition is called Complete Androgen Insensitivity Syndrome. These women might even look more feminine than genetically female women, since their body doesn't use androgens at all, so they tend to have very little extra body hair etc. Think about that when you next talk to a woman you fancy. :devil:

Its going to be such joy seeing my friends faces when I tell them this.
Preferably after theyve just ogled a woman.
:twirl:
User avatar
Penny Flame
 
Posts: 3336
Joined: Sat Aug 12, 2006 1:53 am

Post » Thu Jun 07, 2012 11:02 pm

On normalcy and a possible mind-[censored] for some people:

There are women, who look like women, walk, talk and behave like women, have all the external equipment associated with that, were born like that, and yet are genetically male. The only difference is that they have no cervix or uterus, and have internal male gonads(stupid autocensor) instead of ovaries. The condition is called Complete Androgen Insensitivity Syndrome. These women might even look more feminine than genetically female women, since their body doesn't use androgens at all, so they tend to have very little extra body hair etc. Think about that when you next talk to a woman you fancy. :devil:
I think I learned about this on an episode of House M.D. o.o;
User avatar
mollypop
 
Posts: 3420
Joined: Fri Jan 05, 2007 1:47 am

Post » Thu Jun 07, 2012 11:25 am

You guys both sadden me and crack me up. Do you honestly believe that the influence of violence in video games has had a greater effect on people than the rampant sixuality that is pushed around in almost every form of media? Ask yourself this question... how many people do I know that had some trauma in their life due to the misuse of their sixuality? Unexpected pregnancies? Sickness? Disease? I bet you know at least one.. Two? Three? Now ask yourself how many people you know that have utilized excessive violence in an illegal, unsanctioned manner. I GUARANTEE you, the first list is longer than the last. And even if there are a few exceptions in this forum, the combined lists of everyone would shove the sixuality problems way beyond violence.

I'm no prude. I love six. I'm married, I have 3 kids and enjoy six quite frequently. The sixuality in the game, while childish imo, is not a problem for me. I know who I am and what I am about and it will not change that. But to put ideas like these in front of a child's eyes when they are still forming their value system, that's a different story.

And yes, I could simply not let him play the game at all. That's the easiest and safest solution here. But the reality for me is that my son and I love video games and TES is the best of the best for both of us. It'd sadden both of us if he couldn't even see the game. So, I simply wanted to know if there was some way I could let him play the best video game ever made without seeing crap that I fear may actually effect his outlook on life.

It's sad that people try to associate this with a specific country. This is Catholicism... a world wide religion. It's sad that so many people find traditional values so laughable while millions of babies are murdered in the womb because of unwanted pregnancies. You might find it funny, but for me, I'll take my path and continue to believe I made the right choices... and I'll raise my children to do the same to the best of my abilities.
User avatar
A Boy called Marilyn
 
Posts: 3391
Joined: Sat May 26, 2007 7:17 am

Post » Thu Jun 07, 2012 8:00 pm

You guys both sadden me and crack me up. Do you honestly believe that the influence of violence in video games has had a greater effect on people than the rampant sixuality that is pushed around in almost every form of media? Ask yourself this question... how many people do I know that had some trauma in their life due to the misuse of their sixuality? Unexpected pregnancies? Sickness? Disease? I bet you know at least one.. Two? Three? Now ask yourself how many people you know that have utilized excessive violence in an illegal, unsanctioned manner. I GUARANTEE you, the first list is longer than the last. And even if there are a few exceptions in this forum, the combined lists of everyone would shove the sixuality problems way beyond violence.

A staggering majority of people will have six in their lifetime. It's built into us, allows the human species to exist in the first place,and is the reason why any of us are sitting at our computer today, talking about the issue. Most people WILL have six, and making it a taboo issue that's not talked about and avoiding showing normal healthy sixuality in the media contributes to the problems related to six. YOU are part of the problem. But we'll go there a bit later...

And no, none of my acquaintances has had an unplanned pregnancy or has had any sixually transmitted diseases. That might be because I live in Finland, where these issues are discussed openly and in a healthy manner.

But to put ideas like these in front of a child's eyes when they are still forming their value system, that's a different story.

This is a M-rate game. You are failing your child, if you let him/her play it.

And yes, I could simply not let him play the game at all. That's the easiest and safest solution here. But the reality for me is that my son and I love video games and TES is the best of the best for both of us. It'd sadden both of us if he couldn't even see the game. So, I simply wanted to know if there was some way I could let him play the best
video game ever made without seeing crap that I fear may actually effect his outlook on life.

Somehow you failed to mention this, and came off as fishing for the "sixy bits". Even after the ESRB rating told you that this game has lots of mature themes, you had to come and fish for specific ones. That should raise most people's eyebrows. Neither six or violence is for children. I find it funny that you're willing to allow your kid to see the latter. No matter which one you consider more inappropriate for a child, the other one still isn't harmless. Personally I consider Sam Peckinpah's http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0074695/ one of the best movies ever made, but I have no intention of showing it to my kids until they're old enough. Sometimes you just have to wait.

It's sad that people try to associate this with a specific country. This is Catholicism... a world wide religion. It's sad that so many people find traditional values so laughable while millions of babies are murdered in the womb because of unwanted pregnancies. You might find it funny, but for me, I'll take my path and continue to believe I made the right choices... and I'll raise my children to do the same to the best of my abilities.

Catholicism is (luckily) not a worldwide religion. It's a religion that covers up paedophilia, lies about the effectiveness of condems to promote absolute morality over people's well-being, tries to control women through their bodies, and people through their sixuality in general, and is just generally full of judgemental [censored] like you. The whole point of making sixuality seem bad, and limiting the access of the religious to it, is to make them desire it even more, and thus make them easily led, like a bull through his nose ring. The taboo against six makes you think even more about six, which makes you feel dirty, and so in need of "moral support", which you will go get from your priests. Bam! Instant control!
I'm not saying other religions are much better, but at least some of them don't attempt to push their twisted morality on others.
User avatar
Claire Lynham
 
Posts: 3432
Joined: Mon Feb 12, 2007 9:42 am

Post » Thu Jun 07, 2012 7:14 pm

go to the chapel of dibella in markarth and look at the statues.
User avatar
Skivs
 
Posts: 3550
Joined: Sat Dec 01, 2007 10:06 pm

Post » Thu Jun 07, 2012 9:51 pm

So I come in here, ask a simple question, get judged and ridiculed for pages and I am the judgmental one. You, sir, have some self examination to do. You don't know me and you can no longer even recognize simple realities.
User avatar
Emilie M
 
Posts: 3419
Joined: Fri Mar 16, 2007 9:08 am

Post » Thu Jun 07, 2012 9:14 pm

"I hear elven girls are INSATIABLE"

Main quest quote lol, if you stop at some key moment to listen to what the people in a certain key place have to say, before doing some key action in order to get farther into said key location

Hope I didn't spoil it for ya
User avatar
Michael Korkia
 
Posts: 3498
Joined: Mon Jul 23, 2007 7:58 pm

Post » Thu Jun 07, 2012 9:53 pm

So I come in here, ask a simple question, get judged and ridiculed for pages and I am the judgmental one. You, sir, have some self examination to do. You don't know me and you can no longer even recognize simple realities.

You yourself cast aspersions on people because of them talking about sixuality, and acted generally judgemental and pompous about it. And this isn't the first thread you've done it in, if I remember correctly. I know my own faults full well, but they're not in this area. And I'm not going to let them be used to lead me around, like some people. You're a stooge, and I've seen plenty of people like you. It used to be funny when I was younger, but the older I get, the more tiring it gets to see you people do that little dance of "moral indignation" of yours.

And to add:

Your question was laughable because if you really were asking it to protect your children, you could've played the game first to see what you can show your kids and what not. Instead, you sat on the issue for two months, and then came back asking about it in the skeeviest way possible.
User avatar
Charleigh Anderson
 
Posts: 3398
Joined: Fri Feb 02, 2007 5:17 am

PreviousNext

Return to V - Skyrim