Are Brink's ingame designs aimed for a younger audience?

Post » Sat May 28, 2011 2:55 pm

What? 30 votes? Try 3,000 votes over a sufficiently random pool of survey-takers. The OP didn't create the poll to see who liked Brink's art direction, he or she created the poll to see if there was a correlation between age and liking Brink's art direction. That would be fine in itself, but age cannot be directly applied to intellectual/emotion maturity. That the OP implied a correlation between age and intellectual/emotional maturity undermines the purpose of the poll and creates skewed results that will be interpreted incorrectly.


Quoted from the internet:
The number 30 has a very interesting relation with Normal distributions. To begin with, the Central Limit Theorm states that no matter what the distribution of the actual population is (it may be totally random and may not follow any distribution), the sample means will follow normal distribution if the sample size is large enough. This "large enough" has been statistically accepted to be 30 - meaning that if we draw samples of size 30 or more (n >30), the sample means shall follow a normal distribution, irrespective of how random the original population was.

And once you have normal distribution, you can start to use it as an approximation of the whole. The larger the group, the better the chance of the sample group mirroring the whole, but at 30, the chances of the sample group being an outlier are pretty small.

As far as your claim that age is an inexact measure of maturity or opinion, you will see that i happen to agree with you, if you look at my post about conservativeism.
User avatar
Claudz
 
Posts: 3484
Joined: Thu Sep 07, 2006 5:33 am

Post » Sat May 28, 2011 11:16 am

Quoted from the internet:
The number 30 has a very interesting relation with Normal distributions. To begin with, the Central Limit Theorm states that no matter what the distribution of the actual population is (it may be totally random and may not follow any distribution), the sample means will follow normal distribution if the sample size is large enough. This "large enough" has been statistically accepted to be 30 - meaning that if we draw samples of size 30 or more (n >30), the sample means shall follow a normal distribution, irrespective of how random the original population was.

And once you have normal distribution, you can start to use it as an approximation of the whole. The larger the group, the better the chance of the sample group mirroring the whole, but at 30, the chances of the sample group being an outlier are pretty small.

As far as your claim that age is an inexact measure of maturity or opinion, you will see that i happen to agree with you, if you look at my post about conservativeism.



I tried to manhandle your argument down the trash, I apologize. When I said, "lololol Try 3,000 votes trolololo" I should have said, "the population on Brink's official forum can not be polled sufficiently random enough to qualify a survey's findings as representative of the whole population: this is not a Normal distribution". The whole population being people who play/will play Brink, or have gone in depth with the art direction for other purposes.

Which isn't really that important, as our second point (age is an inexact measure of intellectual or emotional maturity) will most likely not be sufficiently refuted for this poll to stand as-is in the lifetime of the poll... or ever. It's a flawed poll.
User avatar
Vivien
 
Posts: 3530
Joined: Fri Apr 13, 2007 2:47 pm

Post » Sat May 28, 2011 1:34 pm

One thing to keep in mind about this poll is that you polling age and nothing else - in your post you are assuming maturity and deepness of thought is a constant amongst the ages, the lower the age the lower the maturity of the person. While arguable, it is a logical fallacy to assume this with such a small pool to survey. The designs to me aren't childish, anything but. For my experiences, the last Call of Duty single-player campaign felt like a little kid wearing his daddies suit in front of the mirror, while from what I've seen of Brink the atmosphere within the single-player campaign is more of a Robert Redford in The Castle.



Once you get 30 votes in a given age group, you can assume that it is normal distribution, and relatively representative of the group at hand

If we ignore the age part of the vote, we have 50 people (more than enough for normal distribution) who show a clear preference for the current artstyle.

The group being polled, however, is "people who care enough about the game to actually come on the forums". The fact that this is the official forums is going to slant the vote in the favor of people who like how the game looks.

If you wanted to get a proper poll, you would need to do it at a generic gaming website, which would only include the group we care about; gamers (hardcoe gamers, granted, but it would be a better mix than you find here). You then could take the results of the poll and make a thread here about it.


LMAO, let me say right off the bat that both of you took this to a philosophical level, but if you wanna take it there..the im GAME!! so here it is:

@Shadowcat
You are right. After i did the poll I realized that the results of this poll cannot be taken to seriously due to the fact that all of the voters here are enough of fans of the game to come and join the forums. that being said, i cannot call this results conclusive as the audience was biased, and obviously the group was not enough in numbers or diversity.

@Dromaeosaur
In terms of maturity, i guess you could say that i implied that lower age = less maturity, but that would be very vague. I acknowledge that maturity from one person varies with the next, and just because 2 people have the same age does not mean they have the same maturity. But, since you opened the philosophy door, i am going to further argue that even the concept of 'maturity' is but a subjective one. What one person considers mature might not be the same for the next person. Even more, maturity is not something you can physically or scientifically measure or define. So really this poll was not intended towards maturity, but more towards the tendencies (notice i didnt say certainties) in behavior and thought that come with age.
User avatar
mike
 
Posts: 3432
Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 6:51 pm

Post » Sat May 28, 2011 7:20 pm

I (as a 13-16 yr old) resent your opinion that 13-16 yr olds are childish and easily amused by pretty colours.


Anyway (as has been stated before), the art style is more likely to drive off most 7-15 yr olds, who'll think it's a kid's game and reject it as a sign of their manlyness and maturity, before going off to arm wrestle and [censored].


(Yes, I am 13-16. So are most of my friends. We're just really self-aware.)


And ninjat_126,

i am not saying this to offend you, but in all honesty if you are in that age group, 13-16, you definitely still are a child. trust me when i say that when you are several years older you will look back and say "damn i was just a kid. i knew nothing back then"
User avatar
Katie Pollard
 
Posts: 3460
Joined: Thu Nov 09, 2006 11:23 pm

Post » Sat May 28, 2011 8:58 pm

And ninjat_126,

i am not saying this to offend you, but in all honesty if you are in that age group, 13-16, you definitely still are a child. trust me when i say that when you are several years older you will look back and say "damn i was just a kid. i knew nothing back then"


C'mon, dude, that's an unfair generalisation.
User avatar
Emerald Dreams
 
Posts: 3376
Joined: Sun Jan 07, 2007 2:52 pm

Post » Sat May 28, 2011 7:11 pm

C'mon, dude, that's an unfair generalisation.

Not really. Even really mature teens tend to grow more before they hit 25, usually becoming remarkable individuals by that age. So while at 16 they might be an advlt compared to others, they are still a child compared to what they will become.

The only problem with calling them a "child by comparison" is the negative connotation it has for anyone who is already mature.
User avatar
Brittany Abner
 
Posts: 3401
Joined: Wed Oct 24, 2007 10:48 pm

Post » Sat May 28, 2011 5:07 pm

C'mon, dude, that's an unfair generalisation.


Again, it wasnt meant as an insult, but i stand by it. I know you feel you are mature and knowledgeable, and i dont doubt you are. But you still have so much to go, you will only realize it in time. One of this world's most respected philosophers,
"I know that I know nothing" - Socrates


Not really. Even really mature teens tend to grow more before they hit 25, usually becoming remarkable individuals by that age. So while at 16 they might be an advlt compared to others, they are still a child compared to what they will become.

The only problem with calling them a "child by comparison" is the negative connotation it has for anyone who is already mature.

Kudos. Could not have said it better myself. But I personally think that even past 25 one still so much to learn. Hell, i think no one ever stops learning.
User avatar
Gemma Archer
 
Posts: 3492
Joined: Sun Jul 16, 2006 12:02 am

Post » Sun May 29, 2011 2:30 am

Again, it wasnt meant as an insult, but i stand by it. I know you feel you are mature and knowledgeable, and i dont doubt you are. But you still have so much to go, you will only realize it in time. One of this world's most respected philosophers,
"I know that I know nothing" - Socrates


I wasn't referring to myself, I was saying you were unfairly generalising the 13-16 or-whatever-it-was year old. I am 18......and a different person.
Also, that's kind of an odd use of that quote. Socrates wasn't referring to learning of our ignorance, he was talking about the fact that man is ignorant; as in we know far less than we think we know and can never know anything with absolute certainty, and that almost everything we think we know is only true in our own contexts, not on a personal level, but as a collective human race.
User avatar
Louise Dennis
 
Posts: 3489
Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2007 9:23 pm

Post » Sun May 29, 2011 1:17 am

The more videos I see of brink, the more I feel like the visuals for this game are childish. Dont get me wrong, I admire SD for trying to bring color into shooter. It is not like the designs bother me, but it definitely does not appeal to me. I can honestly say that the characters are memorable but I find myself wishing they were forgettable. And not only the faces, but the clothing too. Many of the clothing styles just seem cartoon-ish, like the bug for example. I wont criticize those who like it, but exactly who is it that likes it? I wanted to make a poll to see how different age groups react to the design in this game.

I made a decision to only include 'Like it' and 'Dont like it' choices and not a 'dont mind it' choice because the main point of this poll is whether you like the designs or you would have rather they went a different road with it. 'dont mind it' feels like a completely different concept. e.g. i dont mind american cheese, but i prefer swiss for my sandwiches :cool:


wow, i feel the exact opposite, the art style is my favorite part.
User avatar
Nathan Barker
 
Posts: 3554
Joined: Sun Jun 10, 2007 5:55 am

Post » Sat May 28, 2011 2:49 pm

Wow, im VERY surprised with the results of this poll. I though that the 13-16 range would dominite in the 'like it' part, which it did, but anything above that i though there would be many more who would have preferred different artistic style. I would have preferred something more along the lines of army of 2 40th day, but that is just my opinion.

I thought you had to be 18 to post here...
User avatar
nath
 
Posts: 3463
Joined: Mon Jan 22, 2007 5:34 am

Post » Sat May 28, 2011 4:05 pm

I thought you had to be 18 to post here...

13, thus the lower limit on the poll
User avatar
Red Sauce
 
Posts: 3431
Joined: Fri Aug 04, 2006 1:35 pm

Post » Sat May 28, 2011 7:35 pm

I love the art style of Brink. I'm 15 but that's not what draws me to it. Even if I was way older, I would still enjoy Brink I've seen a billion realistic looking shooters. I don't want Brink to be a billion and 1. The same goes for if all games were hyperrealistic, I would want Brink to look realistic and not hyperrealistic

But all in all, i like Brinks style, it makes my eyes feel like they're high on drugs ^_^ Shinigami, you're just weird lol.
User avatar
Nathan Risch
 
Posts: 3313
Joined: Sun Aug 05, 2007 10:15 pm

Post » Sat May 28, 2011 11:43 am

Yeah i have to agree with the post above about COD. Ever since Modern Warfare ive felt that games like Call of Duty that try for the super realistic even look more unreal in the end. All the shiny surfaces and what not. What i like about this art style and cel shading(one of my favs) is they allow for alot more detail than the photo realistic designs. Plus i love the grity feeling that this game has too it which also makes it feel just that much more realistic.
User avatar
Gemma Archer
 
Posts: 3492
Joined: Sun Jul 16, 2006 12:02 am

Post » Sun May 29, 2011 1:46 am

i like brinks style better, other games try too hard to look "realistic" which IMO makes em look worse.


I very much agree with you games try way to hard to look more "real" when most games that go for the cartoony look seem to always come out better and brighter. I just think some games should kinda pull away from the "realism" of some games and try something a bit more unreal and they might turn out better. (but thats just my opinion)
User avatar
Caroline flitcroft
 
Posts: 3412
Joined: Sat Nov 25, 2006 7:05 am

Post » Sat May 28, 2011 11:28 pm

man. i wish you put 20 yr olds in the next bracket... kuz i think teens should have their own bracket! i ain't no baby!!!
User avatar
Jason Rice
 
Posts: 3445
Joined: Thu Aug 16, 2007 3:42 pm

Post » Sat May 28, 2011 10:00 pm

I am sick of people looking at a virtual world and comparing it to the real world, instead of immersing themselves into the beautiful world that was created for them and looking at it in it's own right,
User avatar
Del Arte
 
Posts: 3543
Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 8:40 pm

Post » Sat May 28, 2011 10:29 pm

And ninjat_126, i am not saying this to offend you, but in all honesty if you are in that age group, 13-16, you definitely still are a child. trust me when i say that when you are several years older you will look back and say "damn i was just a kid. i knew nothing back then"



C'mon, dude, that's an unfair generalisation.


To be fair, the frontal lobe of the human brain is not fully developed untill age 25, btw that is the part of the brain most commonly assoicated with decision making skills. So yes teenagers and young advlts are mentally childish when compared to their older selfs, which is why we have the term "full-grown advlt", meaning a advlt who has pretty much grown up as much as he/she ever will. So yes, you will look back at your teenage years and say "wow i was stupid" because you will be so much smarter in comparison to your younger self.

However, that is a good thing. Because if you are a smart teenager, then that means you will most likely become a brilliant advlt.
User avatar
Katey Meyer
 
Posts: 3464
Joined: Sat Dec 30, 2006 10:14 pm

Post » Sat May 28, 2011 9:20 pm

Lawl I'm the only one who voted for 30+!

No your not.
User avatar
jasminε
 
Posts: 3511
Joined: Mon Jan 29, 2007 4:12 am

Post » Sun May 29, 2011 3:19 am

No your not.


He was at the moment. <_<
User avatar
Doniesha World
 
Posts: 3437
Joined: Sun Jan 07, 2007 5:12 pm

Post » Sat May 28, 2011 3:32 pm

Lawl I'm the only one who voted for 30+!



No your not.


Hey since he both of you (i assume) are 30+ years old, i would love to hear your opinion on the visuals. I was expecting people like you guys to prefer something more realistic or serious.
User avatar
Gemma Flanagan
 
Posts: 3432
Joined: Sun Aug 13, 2006 6:34 pm

Post » Sun May 29, 2011 12:45 am

Will be 46 in 2 days. I'm really liking the look of this game despite coming from games such as OFP, CoD, Battlefield and so on. But that might be due in part of my love for near future sci-fi art. This game and it's characters remind me of Mad Max and Road Warrior with a slight exaggeration.
User avatar
DeeD
 
Posts: 3439
Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2007 6:50 pm

Post » Sat May 28, 2011 12:27 pm

I am almost 30 and I am simply tired of realism. If you want realism, go to the gun store and shoot up a grocery store(SATIRE ALERT!)

But seriously I want to be captivated. I want to feel in game immersion. I think BRINK aesthetics, not just the character models and colors but the environments as well give a cell shaded feel but with sharper definition. As for the characters, I think they are awesome.
User avatar
Sweet Blighty
 
Posts: 3423
Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:39 am

Post » Sat May 28, 2011 11:58 pm

Will be 46 in 2 days. I'm really liking the look of this game despite coming from games such as OFP, CoD, Battlefield and so on. But that might be due in part of my love for near future sci-fi art. This game and it's characters remind me of Mad Max and Road Warrior with a slight exaggeration.


Cheers on the mad max reference. I was seriously thinking that as I was typing my previous post.
User avatar
Melly Angelic
 
Posts: 3461
Joined: Wed Aug 15, 2007 7:58 am

Post » Sat May 28, 2011 11:37 pm

I would say brinks visual flair isn't hyperrealism but rather heavily stylised. To answer your question yes I like it...It helps to give Brinks visuals thier own identity and stand out more because everyone else is going for hyperrealism.


This is my opinion also.

From the moment they choose to have a different and specific art style in their game is absolutely certain that some won't like it and some will,it's a matter of taste.
If i didn't like it so much i guess i wouldn't mind it that much cause this game offers what FPS genre doesn't...i'll go off topic if i anolyse it,so,simply,i like it ans the Genesis video is cool,my timeline :)
User avatar
Adrian Powers
 
Posts: 3368
Joined: Fri Oct 26, 2007 4:44 pm

Post » Sun May 29, 2011 3:22 am

I like it, but wouldn't have had a problem if it was more realistic or more stylized.
User avatar
Antonio Gigliotta
 
Posts: 3439
Joined: Fri Jul 06, 2007 1:39 pm

PreviousNext

Return to Othor Games