1.07 Beta?

Post » Tue Jul 24, 2012 12:57 pm

Unless its a skyrim blade, they don't break for some reason

:) unless it's a Skyrim blade.
User avatar
Lindsay Dunn
 
Posts: 3247
Joined: Sun Sep 10, 2006 9:34 am

Post » Tue Jul 24, 2012 10:57 am

there is ZERO benefit to rolling 1.6 into 1.7 for the PS3.
For Bethesda themselves there is. Microsoft and Sony charge developers for patches, so releasing two patches shortly after each other costs them more money.

It wouldn't surprise me if the 360 hadn't gotten the 1.6 update either, if it hadn't been required for Dawnguard to work.
User avatar
Anthony Santillan
 
Posts: 3461
Joined: Sun Jul 01, 2007 6:42 am

Post » Tue Jul 24, 2012 6:49 am

For Bethesda themselves there is. Microsoft and Sony charge developers for patches, so releasing two patches shortly after each other costs them more money.

Even still there isn't really an excuse for the silence about it.
User avatar
Margarita Diaz
 
Posts: 3511
Joined: Sun Aug 12, 2007 2:01 pm

Post » Tue Jul 24, 2012 12:51 pm

For Bethesda themselves there is. Microsoft and Sony charge developers for patches, so releasing two patches shortly after each other costs them more money.

It wouldn't surprise me if the 360 hadn't gotten the 1.6 update either, if it hadn't been required for Dawnguard to work.

That could be avoided by not releasing a game with so many bugs, thereby not needing to have so many patches.

Also, the cost of the two patches is a sound investment to encourage faith in the company. Withholding patches can generate a lot of ill-will, and that can manifest itself as loss of sales on the disenfranchised platform for future products.
User avatar
Flesh Tunnel
 
Posts: 3409
Joined: Mon Sep 18, 2006 7:43 pm

Post » Tue Jul 24, 2012 9:22 am

How does that have anything to do with what I said?

My point is, there isn't ANY benefit to the PS3 community by having to wait so long. This is basically just another '[censored] you' from the folks at Bethesda.

Aside from that, at what point will all the Polly-Anna wear off in here? I mena the idea about how we will get a 'better experience' having waited. They aren't fixing anything anymore. They aren't fixing ANY of the real problems in the game. Most of 1.07 is Xbox. And if you discount the 'general optimizations' bullet, which I really doubt is of any substance anymore, then its pretty clear they did damn near NOTHING with this patch but help people with Xbox and Kinect.


As for the when of this delivery, they said we would be getting 1.6, and it never happened. Now they are following the same process that left us high and dry before.

"None of the bugs identified in the 1.06 release by Xboxers or PC users are addressed by 1.07" i was only replying to this part of your post, it looked like you were saying nothing that was in 1.6 would be the 1.7 patch we are getting , thats all.
User avatar
Chris Johnston
 
Posts: 3392
Joined: Fri Jul 07, 2006 12:40 pm

Post » Tue Jul 24, 2012 11:13 am

No I was just asking, not counterpointing, no need to be a ninny

Also if a ninny is a very rude or crude word I apologize, I heard the word in a video and thought it sounded cool

Its OK. I usually do not react and continue such dialogues.
User avatar
Lizzie
 
Posts: 3476
Joined: Sun Nov 19, 2006 5:51 am

Previous

Return to V - Skyrim