Bethesda, Fed up!

Post » Sun May 27, 2012 4:07 am

I've had a few minor bugs in the game, but it's all far from "gamebreaking".
It's to be expected with games with this level of complexity though, made for 3 platforms, of which one has a million different possible combinations of hardware and software (the PC). I'd like to see you do better than these 'idiots' at Bethesda.
User avatar
Dan Wright
 
Posts: 3308
Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 8:40 am

Post » Sun May 27, 2012 6:22 pm

I have played 120+ hours without any game breaking bugs, crashes or major glitches. Just some minor things as people sitting on the edge of a chair. The game is fine and has just been on the marked for 19 days so chillax :rolleyes:
User avatar
liz barnes
 
Posts: 3387
Joined: Tue Oct 31, 2006 4:10 am

Post » Sun May 27, 2012 10:28 am

Seriously, Modders (unprofessional gamers) fixed that crap within a week, but it took them over two weeks to release a patch

Bethesda's patches have to be approved by their respective consoles (steam, Xbox, ps3) before they can go live, and that takes about a week or more.
User avatar
Philip Rua
 
Posts: 3348
Joined: Sun May 06, 2007 11:53 am

Post » Sun May 27, 2012 12:40 pm

Really? Then Bethesda has no reason to be patching, because the games A OK. The PS3 users are not experiencing game breaking performance, it is just us whiners. The PC hardware setups are not causing a billion crashes and poor framerate on top end pcs, it is just us. The xbox users are not having a massive texture issue, it is just me. The game is not setup to only manage and use 2GBs of ram, it is just us. The games shadow rendering does not bollox performance on high end graphics cards and cpus, its just us. There are not several quest breaking bugs preventing the storyline from being completed, its just me.

Get your facts straight man, the games broken, take off the rosey glasses

The game has its flaws and bugs that need fixing, ofcourse.

But it sure as hell isn't "broken".

I have everything maxed, and special eyecandy enabled via the ini files and the nVidia control panel, playing in 3D with a constant framerate of at least 30 FPS (That's 60 actual FPS, in case you aren't familiar with 3D vision) with a GTX 480 and a 3 Ghz quad core processor. My computer hasn't been "high end" for a while now, and I can still play just dandy, I think you should try a more user friendly platform like the 360.
User avatar
Marta Wolko
 
Posts: 3383
Joined: Mon Aug 28, 2006 6:51 am

Post » Sun May 27, 2012 7:41 am

Dude, seriously, you need to up your meds. Millions of possible permutations of PC builds? Yeah, there are going to be issues with some of them, of course. Games need to be targetted and tested not on high end systems, but for the average low end. Open to more hardware, open to more sales. So, testing in a 2GB environment? Not surprising. Leaving it at that and focusing on the awesome level builds, stories, etc? Excellent business and gaming development choice. As for your assessment of Bethesda's programmers? Well, let's just say that I don't see any RPG mega-world titles with your name on them. If it's THAT easy, you do it. Oh, wait, right, it's not that easy. You haven't a hope in hades of doing it. If Beth's code monkeys are idiots, then what does that make you? Sheesh.
I can go out and buy a piece of crap laptop for 400 euro with more ram than 2gb, dude. It's 2011, not 1998. And a pc game should be optimized for modern technology in general, like most PC games are. The whole pc configuration and endless possibility is a moot point because developers make PC games everyday with less than 1/3 of the issues Bethesdas game constantly have. And go play Oblivion vanilla, tell me how you like it. Then add the content from users (like me) and tell me the difference. We do what Bethesda can't, and we do it better.
User avatar
Breautiful
 
Posts: 3539
Joined: Tue Jan 16, 2007 6:51 am

Post » Sun May 27, 2012 4:16 am

Great, now this forum is slowly descending into the Battlefield 3 forum.


Full of complaints because a game has a few problems.


Its not like everyone can create a utopia game where there are no bugs or problems people.
You've got to be joking, or just blind. I have no idea what Bethesda is doing any more.
User avatar
HARDHEAD
 
Posts: 3499
Joined: Sun Aug 19, 2007 5:49 am

Post » Sun May 27, 2012 9:55 am

The game has its flaws and bugs that need fixing, ofcourse.

But it sure as hell isn't "broken".

I have everything maxed, and special eyecandy enabled via the ini files and the nVidia control panel, playing in 3D with a constant framerate of at least 30 FPS (That's 60 actual FPS, in case you aren't familiar with 3D vision) with a GTX 480 and a 3 Ghz quad core processor. My computer hasn't been "high end" for a while now, and I can still play just dandy, I think you should try a more user friendly platform like the 360.
I have been building computers since before you owned one my friend. User friendly is not needed. Check the tech forum, people with twice the computers you have can hardly run the game on high. By the way im running with a GTX 570 which eats yours alive and on ultra settings in certain areas it drops to 20 fps because of poor shadow rendering and poor hardware usage
User avatar
Vicki Gunn
 
Posts: 3397
Joined: Thu Nov 23, 2006 9:59 am

Post » Sun May 27, 2012 9:37 am

Not joking.

You've got to be joking, or just blind. I have no I dead what Bethesda is doing any more.
User avatar
jasminε
 
Posts: 3511
Joined: Mon Jan 29, 2007 4:12 am

Post » Sun May 27, 2012 2:50 pm

I can go out and buy a piece of crap laptop for 400 euro with more ram than 2gb, dude. It's 2011, not 1998. And a pc game should be optimized for modern technology in general, like most PC games are. The whole pc configuration and endless possibility is a moot point because developers make PC games everyday with less than 1/3 of the issues Bethesdas game constantly have. And go play Oblivion vanilla, tell me how you like it. Then add the content from users (like me) and tell me the difference. We do what Bethesda can't, and we do it better.
Pull the other one.


But no, you completed skipped the whole "official patch" thing. Again.
User avatar
Nicole Kraus
 
Posts: 3432
Joined: Sat Apr 14, 2007 11:34 pm

Post » Sun May 27, 2012 6:03 am

Seriously, at this point I have had enough with this company. They can't even make a game in the year 2011 that uses more than 2GBs on a PC hardware configuration. What are they doing in programming? Modders (unprofessional gamers) fixed that crap within a week, but it took them over two weeks to release a patch that fixes next to nothing (fixing "rare" issues, but leaving 50 percent of the quests in the game that are broken, or unplayable untouched) and breaks the game even more.

To Bethesda - Just release the damn construction kit and let us fix your game for you like you do with every game. You people are useless anyway.

They don't care, they got their millions in box sales. Released a crap patch. On to the next broken project. That's the Bethesda way

What are they doing in programming? They made a massive game world with hundreds of quests and a complicated AI routine for NPC's to follow, add in three types of crafting and hundreds of dungeons and that's quite a bit of fancy programing.

Modders didn't fix the 2GB thing. There's tons of ways to make a .exe recognize more than 2gb of RAM during use. It's old technology.

Yea, it took two weeks for their first patch, so what? That seems reasonable to me. One could safely assume that the more complicated a game is, the more prone to bugs it will be. This is a good example. I can't think of any RPG I've played that had any sort of complexity and was bug free, but if you can think of one, let me know.

That said, I haven't had any bugs at all aside from one graphical error that stopped after ~ a minute.
User avatar
Ilona Neumann
 
Posts: 3308
Joined: Sat Aug 19, 2006 3:30 am

Post » Sun May 27, 2012 6:28 pm

Pull the other one.


But no, you completed skipped the whole "official patch" thing. Again.
Im not really sure if you are supporting my argument or against it
User avatar
CArla HOlbert
 
Posts: 3342
Joined: Wed Feb 21, 2007 11:35 pm

Post » Sun May 27, 2012 7:13 am

More so than MW and OB, there are a LOT of console players for this game. Bethesda knows they can't rely on players to fix the game anymore. I'm sure there will be more patches than usual for Skyrim. Their general game plan was to only fix 'game breaking' bugs. But there are so many little things that PC players can fix with a simple console command, I really can't see Bethesda just letting the console players suffer since they bought a large percentage of the game this time around.
User avatar
darnell waddington
 
Posts: 3448
Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2007 10:43 pm

Post » Sun May 27, 2012 5:29 pm

This game is amazing, sure its not perfect ... But to throw a temper tantrum over a video game that is arguably the best game Ive ever played.... You, sir, need to be punched in the face.
User avatar
Craig Martin
 
Posts: 3395
Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2007 4:25 pm

Post » Sun May 27, 2012 4:29 am

What are they doing in programming? They made a massive game world with hundreds of quests and a complicated AI routine for NPC's to follow, add in three types of crafting and hundreds of dungeons and that's quite a bit of fancy programing.

Modders didn't fix the 2GB thing. There's tons of ways to make a .exe recognize more than 2gb of RAM during use. It's old technology.

Yea, it took two weeks for their first patch, so what? That seems reasonable to me. One could safely assume that the more complicated a game is, the more prone to bugs it will be. This is a good example. I can't think of any RPG I've played that had any sort of complexity and was bug free, but if you can think of one, let me know.

That said, I haven't had any bugs at all aside from one graphical error that stopped after ~ a minute.
Seeing as the tech is so easily attainable by us regular folk, it is a wonder Bethesda was not able to incorporate this alien tech (discovered by modders) to make a game render more than 2gb of ram, in ANY of their titles so far. Hmmmm.
User avatar
lydia nekongo
 
Posts: 3403
Joined: Wed Jul 19, 2006 1:04 pm

Post » Sun May 27, 2012 11:55 am

This game is amazing, sure its not perfect ... But to throw a temper tantrum over a video game that is arguably the best game Ive ever played.... You, sir, need to be punched in the face.
I am not arguing that it is not a good game. I am arguing the poor support, tech standards and thought process of the developers. What I find ironic, is that many of you who are supporting Bethesda are expecting official fixes to many of these issues over modded fixes. This just shows me how little you know the company in which we speak.
User avatar
Naomi Ward
 
Posts: 3450
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2006 8:37 pm

Post » Sun May 27, 2012 8:40 am

I have been building computers since before you owned one my friend. User friendly is not needed. Check the tech forum, people with twice the computers you have can hardly run the game on high. By the way im running with a GTX 570 which eats yours alive and on ultra settings in certain areas it drops to 20 fps because of poor shadow rendering and poor hardware usage
At the end of the day, if his computer runs Skyrim without issues, and yours causes you to run off at the mouth like a 5 year old, I'd rather have his.
User avatar
Nymph
 
Posts: 3487
Joined: Thu Sep 21, 2006 1:17 pm

Post » Sun May 27, 2012 2:41 pm

"We do what Bethesda can't, and we do it better."

Holy hell man, knock it off with the massive ego trip.
User avatar
Verity Hurding
 
Posts: 3455
Joined: Sat Jul 22, 2006 1:29 pm

Post » Sun May 27, 2012 5:50 am

Rage.

Epic.... Killer....Rage.
User avatar
Charlotte X
 
Posts: 3318
Joined: Thu Dec 07, 2006 2:53 am

Post » Sun May 27, 2012 3:41 pm

I have been building computers since before you owned one my friend. User friendly is not needed. Check the tech forum, people with twice the computers you have can hardly run the game on high. By the way im running with a GTX 570 which eats yours alive and on ultra settings in certain areas it drops to 20 fps because of poor shadow rendering and poor hardware usage

With your attitude akin to a 12 year old who's mommy brought home the wrong kind of candy, I hardly doubt that.

But thanks for proving my point. I can run the game just fine with my inferior hardware, so it's evidently a problem on your part, not bethesda's.
User avatar
K J S
 
Posts: 3326
Joined: Thu Apr 05, 2007 11:50 am

Post » Sun May 27, 2012 2:20 am

At the end of the day, if his computer runs Skyrim without issues, and yours causes you to run off at the mouth like a 5 year old, I'd rather have his.
And there in is the issue, except it is not just MY computer. Many high end computers are having the issue. Which points toward poor programming and PC optimization. If you don't believe me, please feel free to check the tech forum.
User avatar
Jaylene Brower
 
Posts: 3347
Joined: Tue Aug 15, 2006 12:24 pm

Post » Sun May 27, 2012 10:49 am

I can go out and buy a piece of crap laptop for 400 euro with more ram than 2gb, dude. It's 2011, not 1998. And a pc game should be optimized for modern technology in general, like most PC games are. The whole pc configuration and endless possibility is a moot point because developers make PC games everyday with less than 1/3 of the issues Bethesdas game constantly have. And go play Oblivion vanilla, tell me how you like it. Then add the content from users (like me) and tell me the difference. We do what Bethesda can't, and we do it better.

No, dude, you really don't. Where's your game? Not out? Not even in development? Grunt code monkeys repair existing code. Senior programmers write it from the cornerstone. Put the boots on and do the walking, then you can yammer. Oblivion ran just fine OOB for me. Not everyone can plunk $800 down on a new laptop every year. MANY, MANY college kids, high school kids, and advlts are playing on +3yo bottom line machines NOT meant for gaming. Seriously, are you that tweaked that you can't recognize that not every gamer has the latest self build HW?
User avatar
Milagros Osorio
 
Posts: 3426
Joined: Fri Aug 25, 2006 4:33 pm

Post » Sun May 27, 2012 8:47 am

I'm kinda sad about this whole release aswell.. on one side I love the game (maybe thats enough and we should Please continue, my good sir.) on the other hand I see so many signs of laziness on the developers side. So I guess next time bethesda games wont be day one purchases... All we PC gamers got left are MMOS , oh well at least they entertain me to some degree.
User avatar
Schel[Anne]FTL
 
Posts: 3384
Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 6:53 pm

Post » Sun May 27, 2012 3:18 am

With your attitude akin to a 12 year old who's mommy brought home the wrong kind of candy, I hardly doubt that.

But thanks for proving my point. I can run the game just fine with my inferior hardware, so it's evidently a problem on your part, not bethesda's.
Poorly thought out insults do nothing to support your claims either. Check the tech forums, it is not my computer configuration, its many high end users. I find it funny that I can play crysis on max smoother than a baby's ass, but this game gives my 500 dollar graphics card issues. But you are right it is Nvidias fault
User avatar
Syaza Ramali
 
Posts: 3466
Joined: Wed Jan 24, 2007 10:46 am

Post » Sun May 27, 2012 5:30 am

What I think you should do, is consider- has buying skyrim made your life worse? If so, complain. If not, grow a pair.

I'm a modder too. We don't do what bethesda do and better. We each make contributions, some truely amazing, but all of which ultimatly pale in comparision to what they have created. We can fix what they did not fix- they probably fixed 20x as much as that before release. "we" (I dont want to include myself in your sweeping generalizations) improve the massive, expansive, beautiful world of skyrim to fix things, plug holes, and improve where we see fit. They have created something great from literally nothing.

Consider this. Take "you" (this mythical modding community you are uniting under your banner), put them in a room, and give them the budget bethesda had. You really think you end up with something as good as skyrim? For a start, boobs, boobs everywhere. Secondly, about 10 modders I have seen have created something balanced. I certainly cant. Thirdly... lets just say hole picking/filling is infinatly easier than creating.


Not normally the type to do a rant, but come on- pull your head out of your backside.
User avatar
Dragonz Dancer
 
Posts: 3441
Joined: Sat Jun 24, 2006 11:01 am

Post » Sun May 27, 2012 7:33 am

And there in is the issue, except it is not just MY computer. Many high end computers are having the issue. Which points toward poor programming and PC optimization. If you don't believe me, please feel free to check the tech forum.
Why bother? I'll just find out the configurations of the "lesser" computer that your "monster" "can run circles around", and have no problems with the game instead of consistently whining about it.
User avatar
keri seymour
 
Posts: 3361
Joined: Thu Oct 19, 2006 4:09 am

PreviousNext

Return to V - Skyrim