BF3 vs Rage?

Post » Thu Dec 08, 2011 10:26 am

those stills are prolly before the manditory HD texture pack in the battlefield patch
User avatar
matt
 
Posts: 3267
Joined: Wed May 30, 2007 10:17 am

Post » Thu Dec 08, 2011 2:51 am

yeah rage is definetely a stellar looking game. Rage just feels more natural. I love how the ID tech 5 engine doesn't have any angles. Everything has curves and I love how the textures don't repeat. AMAZING.

90% of the time Rage is one of the best looking games period. It's those close up muddy textures that don't stand up to the rest of the game. Once you stop looking for the crap textures, you'll realize just how good the game looks. I think Rage is definitely a next gen graphics engine, compared to a heavily modified current gen engine in Frostbite 2. I can't wait to see more games use ID tech 5.
User avatar
TASTY TRACY
 
Posts: 3282
Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2006 7:11 pm

Post » Thu Dec 08, 2011 3:13 am

RAGE = fail
BF3 = win

And this is coming from a die-hard id fan who played some of id's earliest games like Wolfenstein 3D.
User avatar
Melly Angelic
 
Posts: 3461
Joined: Wed Aug 15, 2007 7:58 am

Post » Thu Dec 08, 2011 10:05 am

Comparing BF3's graphics with those in Rage can be difficult since they are completely different games. BF3 tries to look photorealistic while Rage look more surreal.

But from a technical point of view, BF3 utilizes more effects, better lighting, destructible environments (something that Rage doesn't have at all), soft particles and plus some very very heavy shader effects especially on wet surfaces that look downright impressive.
Texture quality could be better but it still is miles ahead from Rage.

Rage manages to impress with solid performance, unique world setting and large scale environments. It's special in its own way. But the technology is certainly not cutting edge no matter how bad we want to believe it just because it's an id game.


I agree BF3 is much hyped on graphics but people who own the game and are able to play in ultra settings with zero compromise, will appreciate it better in later levels through the campaign mode. But claims that BF3 has crappy graphics and such, definitely come from people that either don't own the game or are negative biased towards it.
User avatar
Nicole Coucopoulos
 
Posts: 3484
Joined: Fri Feb 23, 2007 4:09 am

Post » Thu Dec 08, 2011 11:29 am

battlefield yall are hating prolly cause u svck at it and are noobs



those stills are prolly before the manditory HD texture pack in the battlefield patch


I hate the way you type. Is it so hard to add a few extra letters ?
Also you come off as a right really devoted fan. People hate it because they "svck".

a) Grow up.
B) Or they just have a different oppinion *gasp*
User avatar
Bedford White
 
Posts: 3307
Joined: Tue Jun 12, 2007 2:09 am

Post » Thu Dec 08, 2011 1:43 am

I hate the way you type. Is it so hard to add a few extra letters ?
Also you come off as a right really devoted fan. People hate it because they "svck".

a) Grow up.
B) Or they just have a different oppinion *gasp*


You're trying to reason with a post like that? Hah..
User avatar
Ernesto Salinas
 
Posts: 3399
Joined: Sat Nov 03, 2007 2:19 pm

Post » Thu Dec 08, 2011 8:13 am

I don't see any "debate" going on here - just a bunch of flaming in all directions. Stop telling each other to "grow up" and behave like a grown up by not insulting each other.
User avatar
Jessie
 
Posts: 3343
Joined: Sat Oct 14, 2006 2:54 am

Previous

Return to Othor Games