That wasn't a fair fight by miles, because the Paladins didn't live up to their lore.

Not a fair fight when you see the paladins using slow as hell single-shooting gauss rifles (and missing) against guys using AMRs and Ranger Sequoias (and NOT missing).
To be honest the BoS might have been better off if some of them had displacer gloves on.

Not fair at all. The Paladins are only up to level 16 and the Vets are at level 21. Then again, maybe this is Obsidian's way of saying that the surviving Mojave Chapter Paladins arent exactly the best of the best of the BoS. Although, even if they were some of the worst fighters a Ranger Vet shouldnt be able to defeat a walking tank Paladin especially the T-51b tank. That's just not plausible at all, unless they set a trap for them. Even Batman can beat Superman if he had to time to plan for it.

If they made a film on Fallout how would any one here imagine how Power Armor would be portrayed? Yea, they would be bullet proof for the most part (I imagine durability similar to Robocop).

Yes but something tells me that the Rangers won for several reasons:

1. See more action than Paladins

2. Paladins weren't accurately represented

3. NCR vets are exactly that, veterans...Paladins aren't the best of the Brotherhood

Even with the edited my fight my money is still on the NCR.

The only reason I think it would even be slightly probable is because Ranger Vets are using Brush Guns, Ranger Sequoias, and AMRs (45-70 gov't ammo and .50 cal). In real life those bullets DO have the stopping power necessary to punch through heavy armor however only if the are AP rounds. It shouldn't be possible for them to punch through T-51b power armor with regular rounds -___-

Proof that PA= underpowered :sadvaultboy: