DLC Confirmed

Post » Sat Apr 30, 2011 1:28 am

http://www.destructoid.com/obsidian-planning-fallout-new-vegas-downloadable-content-181925.phtml#comment

Jason from Bethesda said it himself apparently. I'm not convinced still for some reason.
User avatar
Elizabeth Davis
 
Posts: 3406
Joined: Sat Aug 18, 2007 10:30 am

Post » Sat Apr 30, 2011 1:07 pm

Awesome! Not that I'm convinced either, but I do expect something down the line.
User avatar
Jeffrey Lawson
 
Posts: 3485
Joined: Tue Oct 16, 2007 5:36 pm

Post » Fri Apr 29, 2011 10:51 pm

Sounds good. Hopefully I'll be able to play through a couple times by then before I do my final complete playthrough with all the DLCs. Broken Steel came at a bad time on my first playthrough of Fallout 3. I ended up plateauing at level twenty all the way through half of Operation Anchorage and The Pitt. If they make their DLC as well as they do the regular game, I'm definitely buying it.
User avatar
Dan Wright
 
Posts: 3308
Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 8:40 am

Post » Sat Apr 30, 2011 1:51 am

Now that DLC is confirmed, maybe some people can finally see why Steam DRM was chosen.

They'll likely still complain though.
User avatar
Red Sauce
 
Posts: 3431
Joined: Fri Aug 04, 2006 1:35 pm

Post » Sat Apr 30, 2011 6:59 am

http://www.destructoid.com/fallout-new-vegas-has-a-definitive-end-181927.phtml

A retcon like Broken Steel will not happen again.
User avatar
megan gleeson
 
Posts: 3493
Joined: Wed Feb 07, 2007 2:01 pm

Post » Sat Apr 30, 2011 7:33 am

they will most likely do an expansion at some point, i don't think it will be 5 small dlc's, it will prob be one pretty big expansion.
User avatar
scorpion972
 
Posts: 3515
Joined: Fri Mar 16, 2007 11:20 am

Post » Sat Apr 30, 2011 5:05 am

they will most likely do an expansion at some point, i don't think it will be 5 small dlc's, it will prob be one pretty big expansion.

I think they'll do the episodic 800MSP content like fallout 3 did.
And even if we complain about it we all know we're going to buy the DLC's anyway :rolleyes:
User avatar
michael danso
 
Posts: 3492
Joined: Wed Jun 13, 2007 9:21 am

Post » Sat Apr 30, 2011 9:29 am

Fine. I suppose this is good news.

But if I'm paying 800ms for these DLCs, I expect them to be on the level of Point Lookout, or at least that size. Alternatively, if they want to bring up something of a smaller scale, charge less -- I didn't think it was fair paying £7 for two hours of below-par gameplay.
User avatar
Kieren Thomson
 
Posts: 3454
Joined: Sat Jul 21, 2007 3:28 am

Post » Sat Apr 30, 2011 5:39 am

Would the DLC's for NV also come out on discs? I'm not really one for buying things off the internet.
User avatar
ShOrty
 
Posts: 3392
Joined: Sun Jul 02, 2006 8:15 pm

Post » Sat Apr 30, 2011 3:28 am

Would the DLC's for NV also come out on discs? I'm not really one for buying things off the internet.

I assume they'll do what they did with FO3: release DLC 'packs'. I think the first pack was Pitt and O: A; the second as BS and Point Lookout, etc.

If not, I imagine Obsidian and Bethesda would release a GOTY edition if NV is a big success.
User avatar
lucile
 
Posts: 3371
Joined: Thu Mar 22, 2007 4:37 pm

Post » Sat Apr 30, 2011 4:32 am

they will most likely do an expansion at some point, i don't think it will be 5 small dlc's, it will prob be one pretty big expansion.

Ye i also hope for a huge expansion, not like the Fo3's expansions.
User avatar
maria Dwyer
 
Posts: 3422
Joined: Sat Jan 27, 2007 11:24 am

Post » Sat Apr 30, 2011 2:05 am

I never expected otherwise, honestly.
User avatar
Portions
 
Posts: 3499
Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2007 1:47 am

Post » Sat Apr 30, 2011 2:17 pm

Shame if it's only DLCs. I find it hard to get excited over 2 hour missionpacks, when I have just completed the game that required a 100+ hours.
User avatar
Marie Maillos
 
Posts: 3403
Joined: Wed Mar 21, 2007 4:39 pm

Post » Sat Apr 30, 2011 1:07 am

I posted a few times saying that they would do DLC...it was obvious. Most popular games have DLC now ,it's the trend,plus it's more money making too.
Fallout is the perfect game for DLC & it's popular enough for it too.
If they do five DLC's like fallout 3 ,i'd still buy them....but like most i'd prefer a big expansion.
They may already have ideas for DLC or an expansion....but i just hope obsidian read some of our posts on ideas,because some people have come up with great ideas for NV & future fallouts...not all ideas are good,but there are some very good ones out there :)
User avatar
CSar L
 
Posts: 3404
Joined: Fri Nov 09, 2007 9:36 pm

Post » Sat Apr 30, 2011 2:04 pm

I think they'll do the episodic 800MSP content like fallout 3 did.
And even if we complain about it we all know we're going to buy the DLC's anyway :rolleyes:


You're damn right.
DLC's are just a given in todays market. There's no reason they shouldn't do them. If there's the potential for episodic content in DLC, they will do it. That's legitimate potential, not fan outcry wankfests, mind you.
I just hope the DLC's amount to more than "Hey, look at what other location in the US we nuked to hell!" like a lot of DLC ideas would like to suggest.
User avatar
aisha jamil
 
Posts: 3436
Joined: Sun Jul 02, 2006 11:54 am

Post » Sat Apr 30, 2011 1:03 pm

Shame if it's only DLCs. I find it hard to get excited over 2 hour missionpacks, when I have just completed the game that required a 100+ hours.

This.


I wopuld really appreaciate an expansion...
User avatar
Darlene DIllow
 
Posts: 3403
Joined: Fri Oct 26, 2007 5:34 am

Post » Fri Apr 29, 2011 11:39 pm

I posted a few times saying that they would do DLC...it was obvious. Most popular games have DLC now , it's the trend.

Yeah and most popular games now have multiplayer too, it's the trend.
User avatar
Matt Fletcher
 
Posts: 3355
Joined: Mon Sep 24, 2007 3:48 am

Post » Sat Apr 30, 2011 12:24 am

Now that DLC is confirmed, maybe some people can finally see why Steam DRM was chosen.



No, I really don't see how that has anything to do with it, lots of games have DLC but don't require Steam.

And even if I can understand why they made the choice doesn't mean I have to approve of it, or like it. After all, I can understand why someone might want to rob a bank too, that doesn't change the fact that it's something I would not approve of.

But anyway, I see no reason to be surprised, I always considered it pretty much a given anyway, when DLC has continually proven an effective means to milk extra profit from gamers, why would Obsidian not try to take advantage of it too?
User avatar
Melanie Steinberg
 
Posts: 3365
Joined: Fri Apr 20, 2007 11:25 pm

Post » Sat Apr 30, 2011 12:11 am

Oblivion has no Steam, no GFWL, no DRM, just a disc check for copy protection (which, unlike Fallout 3's disc check, is built into the game executable rather than the launcher), and it has downloadable DLCs which don't use Steam. I downloaded all the DLCs for Oblivion that I use from the official download site obliviondownloads.com (before it went down for months and came back up in its current form).
User avatar
Marine x
 
Posts: 3327
Joined: Thu Mar 29, 2007 4:54 am

Post » Sat Apr 30, 2011 8:56 am

They asked: Will there be DLC?
and he answered: Yes we do!

Does that answer look like it's out of context to anyone else? I question the validity of an article where the "journalist" cannot even quote themselves accurately.
User avatar
Trevi
 
Posts: 3404
Joined: Fri Apr 06, 2007 8:26 pm

Post » Sat Apr 30, 2011 11:33 am

NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO....... i want an expansion packs......
User avatar
Jennifer Munroe
 
Posts: 3411
Joined: Sun Aug 26, 2007 12:57 am

Post » Sat Apr 30, 2011 1:12 am

Yea id prefer an expansion over a DLC. the age were in now believes that a DLC is just an expansion to the game, where in most cases its an excuse to charge more for the full game.
User avatar
Arrogant SId
 
Posts: 3366
Joined: Sat May 19, 2007 11:39 am

Post » Sat Apr 30, 2011 12:48 pm

well i'm hoping they learned a lesson from FO3 and put more energy into one or two expansions or large dlc instead of 5 rushed small incomplete feeling dlc's, the pitt was the best dlc i think, broken steel had good quests and good enemies to fight, but it kinda broke the game with the extra 10 level and all the extra skill points, PL was mostly water if you look at the map of the area, the quests were good but it didn't have one town or settlement, and considering the area was the largest of all DLC's it should of had more friendly people in it and some settlements and some large complexes to explore, but not much is in a swamp so hopefully they learned a lesson there, MZ was fun to do once or twice, but i could of lived without it pretty easy, prob a waste of money. OA was only good to do because of the loot, mainly the gauss rifle and winterized armor, so instead of rushing to buy dlc's like i did with FO3, i will be paying close attention to the reviews of any dlc, and if they are just small, rushed and don't have any towns or settlements, i'll pass on em this time around. if the revies for them are outstanding or very good then i will most likely buy them but i'm gonna have to be more carefully as to not waste money on mediocre dlc's.
User avatar
brandon frier
 
Posts: 3422
Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2007 8:47 pm

Post » Sat Apr 30, 2011 6:16 am

well i'm hoping they learned a lesson from FO3 and put more energy into one or two expansions or large dlc instead of 5 rushed small incomplete feeling dlc's, the pitt was the best dlc i think, broken steel had good quests and good enemies to fight, but it kinda broke the game with the extra 10 level and all the extra skill points, PL was mostly water if you look at the map of the area, the quests were good but it didn't have one town or settlement, and considering the area was the largest of all DLC's it should of had more friendly people in it and some settlements and some large complexes to explore, but not much is in a swamp so hopefully they learned a lesson there, MZ was fun to do once or twice, but i could of lived without it pretty easy, prob a waste of money. OA was only good to do because of the loot, mainly the gauss rifle and winterized armor, so instead of rushing to buy dlc's like i did with FO3, i will be paying close attention to the reviews of any dlc, and if they are just small, rushed and don't have any towns or settlements, i'll pass on em this time around. if the revies for them are outstanding or very good then i will most likely buy them but i'm gonna have to be more carefully as to not waste money on mediocre dlc's.



i thought the pitt was the best story wise but point lookout i think was better because of land mass... i mean they should add the stuff to the game world..... like the world map so we dont have to go to the place to tele from there....
User avatar
KiiSsez jdgaf Benzler
 
Posts: 3546
Joined: Fri Mar 16, 2007 7:10 am

Post » Sat Apr 30, 2011 4:33 pm

I'll hope they bring in a bigger DLC like a 20 dollar DLC or an expansion like it was done with SI in Oblivion. But other than that the DLC sizes for FO3 were fine and I hope they don't bring in smaller ones.

Migration to Steam is a good thing too as GfWL was really bad.
User avatar
Farrah Lee
 
Posts: 3488
Joined: Fri Aug 17, 2007 10:32 pm

Next

Return to Fallout: New Vegas