Fallout: New Vegas Reviews Thread

Post » Sun Mar 06, 2011 1:20 pm

The Joystiq review is the most popular one on the buzz feed right now. :facepalm: I'm going to go eat and try to find more reviews.
User avatar
Mark Hepworth
 
Posts: 3490
Joined: Wed Jul 11, 2007 1:51 pm

Post » Sun Mar 06, 2011 2:34 am

Now I feel alright for the rest of the day :celebration:
User avatar
Johnny
 
Posts: 3390
Joined: Fri Jul 06, 2007 11:32 am

Post » Sun Mar 06, 2011 7:40 am

this game better not be a bust, its suppose to be epic...
User avatar
Cool Man Sam
 
Posts: 3392
Joined: Thu May 10, 2007 1:19 pm

Post » Sun Mar 06, 2011 7:15 am

I'm actually heartened by these reviews. Most of the negatives have to do with bugs and a lack of huge improvements in the game engine. We knew the engine wasn't changing a whole lot, so that gets a big ol' "who cares" from me. For bugs to be the major complaint and for it to still be getting 8's and 9's out of 10, to me, is encouraging. Bugs can be fixed. Sounds like it's going to be an excellent game. If it had no bugs and wasn't a follow-up to another game I'll bet we'd be seeing 9's and 10's. Still, though, 7-9/10 is an excellent score for a follow-up RPG.

*looks at package tracking*

C'mon, dammit!
User avatar
Crystal Clarke
 
Posts: 3410
Joined: Mon Dec 11, 2006 5:55 am

Post » Sun Mar 06, 2011 4:59 am

I wonder how big contrast there will be (if at any) between European and US reviews. With Alpha Protocol it was huge - so big that someone actually ended up making a pretty comprehensive blogpost about differences between the viewpoints and priorities in reviewing a game.
User avatar
An Lor
 
Posts: 3439
Joined: Sun Feb 18, 2007 8:46 pm

Post » Sun Mar 06, 2011 12:51 pm

Well, read the Game Informer review, which makes me a bit sad.

I dunno, guess I'll see when the game launches in...dont.look.at.clock...

:(
User avatar
Lil'.KiiDD
 
Posts: 3566
Joined: Mon Nov 26, 2007 11:41 am

Post » Sun Mar 06, 2011 5:49 pm

I wonder if how big contrast there will be (if at any) between European and US reviews. With Alpha Protocol it was huge - so big that someone actually ended up making a pretty comprehensive blogpost about differences between them.

Don't get me started. I was actually embarrassed at how shallow and unprofessional the U.S. reviews for that game were.
User avatar
glot
 
Posts: 3297
Joined: Mon Jul 17, 2006 1:41 pm

Post » Sun Mar 06, 2011 3:11 pm

I think I'll stop for today, gotta study for the rest of the night. Hopefully there's plenty to read through for you Eastern Hemisphere folks. Like I said in the original post if moderators could help or take over, it would be greatly appreciated.
User avatar
Ria dell
 
Posts: 3430
Joined: Sun Jun 25, 2006 4:03 pm

Post » Sun Mar 06, 2011 8:38 am

I think I'll stop for today, gotta study for the rest of the night. Hopefully there's plenty to read through for you Eastern Hemisphere folks. Like I said in the original post if moderators could help or take over, it would be greatly appreciated.


We'll try to help out when we can, though we're a bit busy at the moment :).
User avatar
Lindsay Dunn
 
Posts: 3247
Joined: Sun Sep 10, 2006 9:34 am

Post » Sun Mar 06, 2011 10:06 am

Don't get me started. I was actually embarrassed at how shallow and unprofessional the U.S. reviews for that game were.


I remember facepalming quite fiendishly. Good times.... :laugh:

Maybe they have learned their lesson this time around.
User avatar
Nicole Elocin
 
Posts: 3390
Joined: Sun Apr 15, 2007 9:12 am

Post » Sun Mar 06, 2011 6:36 am

Reviews, reviews never change.
User avatar
Anna S
 
Posts: 3408
Joined: Thu Apr 19, 2007 2:13 am

Post » Sun Mar 06, 2011 10:06 am

Pretty high reviews considering gamebreaking bugs on 360
User avatar
Elisabete Gaspar
 
Posts: 3558
Joined: Thu Aug 31, 2006 1:15 pm

Post » Sun Mar 06, 2011 7:35 am

gamebreaking bugs?really?great......did they not check to make sure there were bugs before releasing the game!?
User avatar
Eduardo Rosas
 
Posts: 3381
Joined: Thu Oct 18, 2007 3:15 pm

Post » Sun Mar 06, 2011 11:01 am

You still have an hour and a half till it unlocks, but better than waiting till 10:00AM PST :(

Indeed, and with the speed at which my download is going, I'll be about an hour late to the "party." Nothing like showing up fashionable late, though. :disguise:

I'm sorry about how you have to wait until tomorrow morning, but look at it this way. If you have nothing else planned (like work or school), then you'll be able to wake up fully recharged and ready to spend your day in New Vegas. :vaultboy:

If you have school or work, however, what better way is there to unwind after a hectic day than sitting back enjoying the beautiful scenery of New Vegas, gambling in one of the many fine casinos, or blowing a few limbs off of some pesky NPCs that dare challenge your might? :tops:

I, on the other hand, will be able to play it earlier, but I'll be on the verge of falling asleep because I'll be starting so late. Therefore, I imagine I'll only probably get an hour in before I just collapse. :dead:
User avatar
Rik Douglas
 
Posts: 3385
Joined: Sat Jul 07, 2007 1:40 pm

Post » Sun Mar 06, 2011 7:23 am

It's funny that even those with a higher score tend to mention that it could be just a huge expansion. If it were like that, I wouldn't give it a high rating. But I'm no journo, just a lowly translatoresse without any rights to judge those experienced people. ^_^
User avatar
Lori Joe
 
Posts: 3539
Joined: Tue Jun 20, 2006 6:10 am

Post » Sun Mar 06, 2011 8:40 am

It's funny that even those with a higher score tend to mention that it could be just a huge expansion. If it were like that, I wouldn't give it a high rating. But I'm no journo, just a lowly translatoresse without any rights to judge those experienced people. ^_^


It's unfair to punish New Vegas harshly for using the same engine when sports titles or multiplayer shooters have minimal improvements and get 9.x scores.
User avatar
Matt Fletcher
 
Posts: 3355
Joined: Mon Sep 24, 2007 3:48 am

Post » Sun Mar 06, 2011 6:30 pm

Who said anything about game breaking bugs? Chill out. Video game "journalism" is filled with amateur, hack writers without a shred of credibility and a severe lack of ethics. Get a general impression of the game but don't hold some fat nerd's words as gospel. Christ, I expect more from Fallout fans. Remember, these same choads gave every Halo game a 90+ score. A game that basically hasn't changed in the past 10 years or however long.

Oh, what's that you say? All of these reviews are for the 360 version? The most unreliable piece of hardware in the history of video games.? Pfft...........hahahaha.
User avatar
Chris Guerin
 
Posts: 3395
Joined: Thu May 10, 2007 2:44 pm

Post » Sun Mar 06, 2011 3:34 pm

has anyone come accross a pc version review?
User avatar
Kelly Osbourne Kelly
 
Posts: 3426
Joined: Sun Nov 05, 2006 6:56 pm

Post » Sun Mar 06, 2011 3:28 am

Just wanted to pop in one more time before I went to bed. Apparently the Joystiq reviewer didn't even bother to try hardcoe mode and just pass the game off as a direct duplicate of Fallout 3 after only playing 28 hrs into it.
User avatar
Rebecca Dosch
 
Posts: 3453
Joined: Thu Jan 18, 2007 6:39 pm

Post » Sun Mar 06, 2011 10:52 am

has anyone come accross a pc version review?


AtomicGamer has done a comparison paragraph between the three versions in its review. Aside from that haven't seen any, but I haven't looked too much into them for now.
User avatar
Jerry Cox
 
Posts: 3409
Joined: Wed Oct 10, 2007 1:21 pm

Post » Sun Mar 06, 2011 8:05 am

gamebreaking bugs?really?great......did they not check to make sure there were bugs before releasing the game!?

Nope. I'm sure they totally didn't test it at all. :P

has anyone come accross a pc version review?

Not yet. Looking forward to hearing something from Dan Stapleton, though.
User avatar
Klaire
 
Posts: 3405
Joined: Wed Sep 27, 2006 7:56 am

Post » Sun Mar 06, 2011 7:05 am

Just wanted to pop in one more time before I went to bed. Apparently the Joystiq reviewer didn't even bother to try hardcoe mode and just pass the game off as a direct duplicate of Fallout 3 after only playing 28 hrs into it.


I read that one too - it also mentioned *a lot* of bugs. But it did end saying that the overall experience was worth all the imperfections, so swings and roundabouts :shrug: I think the whole "duplicate" thing came from the lack of progression concerning graphics, NPC animation etc. But that didn't bother me in FO:3 so I doubt it will in FO:NV.
User avatar
NIloufar Emporio
 
Posts: 3366
Joined: Tue Dec 19, 2006 6:18 pm

Post » Sun Mar 06, 2011 11:32 am

Pretty good reviews so far. Although, the news of it being a technical mess is most bothersome.


This and it's got me quite nervous as a console gamer. PC users can have all the bugs and glitches ironed out by the modding community while the other platforms must wait for patches. I really want to play the game but all of these bugs is really got me considering waiting a year for the GOTY.
User avatar
Mike Plumley
 
Posts: 3392
Joined: Wed Sep 05, 2007 10:45 pm

Post » Sun Mar 06, 2011 4:43 pm

I regularly disagree with several aspects of a given review; I'm not too worried. On the other hand I also find the kind of dreck some reviewers often worship totally unplayable.

Who said anything about game breaking bugs? Chill out. Video game "journalism" is filled with amateur, hack writers without a shred of credibility and a severe lack of ethics. Get a general impression of the game but don't hold some fat nerd's words as gospel. Christ, I expect more from Fallout fans. Remember, these same choads gave every Halo game a 90+ score. A game that basically hasn't changed in the past 10 years or however long.

Oh, what's that you say? All of these reviews are for the 360 version? The most unreliable piece of hardware in the history of video games.? Pfft...........hahahaha.


Haha, too true!
User avatar
patricia kris
 
Posts: 3348
Joined: Tue Feb 13, 2007 5:49 am

Post » Sun Mar 06, 2011 9:38 am

The PC version of New Vegas is, from a technical standpoint, the best one you can get and it even costs $10 less, but it's got its fair share of problems as well. It's got built-in mod support, higher-resolution textures and better visuals (on a well-enough equipped PC - the system requirements haven't changed much since Fallout 3) and precise mouse-and-keyboard controls that free you up from leaning on the auto-aim found in VATS. It's also got most of the issues and crash bugs that the console versions do, but at least on the PC you have a quicksave key to make saving your progress at any time pretty much instant.



woot
User avatar
Quick Draw III
 
Posts: 3372
Joined: Sat Oct 20, 2007 6:27 am

PreviousNext

Return to Fallout: New Vegas