Kindle Fire

Post » Thu Dec 08, 2011 12:11 pm

Hey everyone. I've been reading about the new Kindle Fire and i was wondering what you all think of it. It seems to me that its an iPad of sorts, but its much cheaper than an iPad. Sure, there are probably things the iPad can do that the Fire can't, but I think it's the better deal. Thoughts?
User avatar
Benito Martinez
 
Posts: 3470
Joined: Thu Aug 30, 2007 6:33 am

Post » Thu Dec 08, 2011 6:25 pm

I was actually considering one, until I found out it only had 6 GB of data storage available to the user. That's almost nothing. That basically forces you to buy digital content from Amazon so you can use cloud storage.

Still looks like a pretty good thing for internet browsing, but there's no telling how fast wireless kills the 8 hour battery.
User avatar
Kayla Bee
 
Posts: 3349
Joined: Fri Aug 24, 2007 5:34 pm

Post » Thu Dec 08, 2011 4:41 pm

I was actually considering one, until I found out it only had 6 GB of data storage available to the user. That's almost nothing. That basically forces you to buy digital content from Amazon so you can use cloud storage.

Still looks like a pretty good thing for internet browsing, but there's no telling how fast wireless kills the 8 hour battery.

The website information about it does say that the battery lasts 8 hours. However it notes that it only lasts 8 hours IF there is no wireless internet usage at all. So being on the internet with it all the time will most likely cut down on the battery life considerably.
User avatar
Laura Cartwright
 
Posts: 3483
Joined: Mon Sep 25, 2006 6:12 pm

Post » Thu Dec 08, 2011 4:38 pm

1. It is not "an iPad of sorts" If iPad was a Macbook, then the Fire would be one of Acer's original Netbook offerings (that is to say, extremely cheaply made and extremely underpowered)

2. It's an underpowered tablet for basic web surfing and reading your kindle books.

3. Amazon pretty much stripped out all the advantages of an Android tablet by forking the Android source code

4. Ice Cream Sandwich will never run on it (because Amazon forked the source code)

5. Doesn't have full multitouch support

If you want "an iPad of sorts" you should look at the upcoming Transformer Prime
User avatar
M!KkI
 
Posts: 3401
Joined: Sun Jul 16, 2006 7:50 am

Post » Thu Dec 08, 2011 12:55 pm

1. It is not "an iPad of sorts" If iPad was a Macbook, then the Fire would be one of Acer's original Netbook offerings (that is to say, extremely cheaply made and extremely underpowered)

2. It's an underpowered tablet for basic web surfing and reading your kindle books.

3. Amazon pretty much stripped out all the advantages of an Android tablet by forking the Android source code

4. Ice Cream Sandwich will never run on it (because Amazon forked the source code)

5. Doesn't have full multitouch support

If you want "an iPad of sorts" you should look at the upcoming Transformer Prime

1. What do you mean it doesn't have multitouch support?

2. Would the new white iPod touch be better then this?
User avatar
Melly Angelic
 
Posts: 3461
Joined: Wed Aug 15, 2007 7:58 am

Post » Thu Dec 08, 2011 5:22 pm

1. What do you mean it doesn't have multitouch support?

I said FULL multitouch support. The Fire cannot recognize more than 2 fingers, limiting gesture input.

2. Would the new white iPod touch be better then this?

The iPod touch is not a tablet
User avatar
Janeth Valenzuela Castelo
 
Posts: 3411
Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 3:03 am

Post » Fri Dec 09, 2011 12:57 am

I'm not a fan of fake books. :shrug:
User avatar
Amysaurusrex
 
Posts: 3432
Joined: Wed Aug 09, 2006 2:45 pm

Post » Thu Dec 08, 2011 9:46 pm

The current http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JRpSuS1xRe4 commercial features visuals pertaining to the elements used in letterpress printing.
Being a hard core enthusiast and collector of this dying art form, I posted a link to this video on our letterpress printing forum.
We were not kind in our assessment concerning the details presented in the visuals included in the section featuring the letterpress elements.
My conclusion was that advertisers are not required to be correct. The only requirement here was to sell Kindles.
In addition, the section goes by so quickly, it's hard to pick out the details with casual viewing.
I won't bore you with the details...only know that they weren't concerned with appearing to be correct.

I am personally not interested in Kindles and the like, and I may not understand all of what they are capable of.....
...but, I will read a real book made of paper or simply view .pdf's on my computer, as I don't really require the mobility that they seem to offer.
User avatar
Sarah Knight
 
Posts: 3416
Joined: Mon Jun 19, 2006 5:02 am

Post » Fri Dec 09, 2011 1:25 am

I'm not a fan of fake books. :shrug:

That would be an ereader, not a tablet. A tablet is for mobile computing (many times more mobile than a laptop)
User avatar
le GraiN
 
Posts: 3436
Joined: Thu Mar 22, 2007 6:48 pm

Post » Thu Dec 08, 2011 12:39 pm

That would be an ereader, not a tablet. A tablet is for mobile computing (many times more mobile than a laptop)


I'm not a fan of tablets either. :P

Honestly, we've got the smart phone and the laptop. Anything in between seems frivolous to me. Obviously that's just my opinion, don't think I'm hating on tablets.
User avatar
QuinDINGDONGcey
 
Posts: 3369
Joined: Mon Jul 23, 2007 4:11 pm

Post » Thu Dec 08, 2011 2:20 pm

1. It is not "an iPad of sorts" If iPad was a Macbook, then the Fire would be one of Acer's original Netbook offerings (that is to say, extremely cheaply made and extremely underpowered)

2. It's an underpowered tablet for basic web surfing and reading your kindle books.

3. Amazon pretty much stripped out all the advantages of an Android tablet by forking the Android source code

4. Ice Cream Sandwich will never run on it (because Amazon forked the source code)

5. Doesn't have full multitouch support

If you want "an iPad of sorts" you should look at the upcoming Transformer Prime

So.... is there any point to this product?
User avatar
Pete Schmitzer
 
Posts: 3387
Joined: Fri Sep 14, 2007 8:20 am

Post » Thu Dec 08, 2011 2:08 pm

Well, it can browse the internet. For maybe five hours before it needs recharging :whistling:
User avatar
Marion Geneste
 
Posts: 3566
Joined: Fri Mar 30, 2007 9:21 pm

Post » Thu Dec 08, 2011 6:32 pm

I'm not a fan of tablets either. :P

Honestly, we've got the smart phone and the laptop. Anything in between seems frivolous to me. Obviously that's just my opinion, don't think I'm hating on tablets.

Laptops svck IMO, tablets are far more useful. They have an excellent battery life (the Transformer original has a 16 hour battery life with the dock, no laptop can touch that), bigger screen than smartphones, allow for content creation at a greater extent than smartphones, and are honned much better for content consumption than laptops.

I never plan on buying a laptop again. If I get the Transformer Prime (just waiting on some important benchmarks related to my planned use) I'm going to light my laptop on fire. Laptops battery life svcks, they svck at note-taking (compared to a tablet where http://campuslife.asus.com/index/4839/the-future-of-note-taking-how-supernote-works/), and are too bulky to be considered mobile (unless you get 13.3'' or smaller)

I can also remote into my desktop from anywhere in the world so long as I have an Internet connection and therefore would be able to access the full power of a desktop from a tablet.

So.... is there any point to this product?

cheap mobile web browsing, cheap mobile video watching, consolidate your ereader, (very) basic mobile content creation
User avatar
Isaiah Burdeau
 
Posts: 3431
Joined: Mon Nov 26, 2007 9:58 am

Post » Thu Dec 08, 2011 8:37 pm

I'm not a fan of tablets either. :P

Honestly, we've got the smart phone and the laptop. Anything in between seems frivolous to me. Obviously that's just my opinion, don't think I'm hating on tablets.


All I want is a stupid phone that won't drop calls every other conversation.
User avatar
hannaH
 
Posts: 3513
Joined: Tue Aug 15, 2006 4:50 am

Post » Thu Dec 08, 2011 8:10 pm

All I want is a stupid phone that won't drop calls every other conversation.

You can blame urban cell tower density making manufactures decide to shrink antenna size in order to make their phones lighter/smaller. Usually there are instructions on the Internet for popular phones for methods of properly creating and attaching an extended antenna.
User avatar
Alyna
 
Posts: 3412
Joined: Wed Aug 30, 2006 4:54 am

Post » Thu Dec 08, 2011 8:56 pm

Thanks Defron...I'll look into it.
User avatar
Jeffrey Lawson
 
Posts: 3485
Joined: Tue Oct 16, 2007 5:36 pm

Post » Thu Dec 08, 2011 11:55 pm

Kindle Fire is just Kindle, not iPad. Andriod [censored] had been hyping the news calling it an iPad killer when Amazon didn't tell a thing about it. It is in the end as I expected, a terminal device for Amazon services. If you don't use Amazon, it's not for you. If you are current Amazon customer, or planning to be one, it is most definately a great pick.

I am a regular customer of Amazon, but my interest is solely on ebooks, and I'm looking for a DX size kindle touch.
User avatar
aisha jamil
 
Posts: 3436
Joined: Sun Jul 02, 2006 11:54 am

Post » Fri Dec 09, 2011 12:30 am

The Nook tablet is coming out in a couple of weeks, too. From the specs it looks like it is slightly more powerful then the Fire. B&N doesn't have the same kind of content library that Amazon has so it looks like the Nook will depend on other providers like Netflix and Hulu.
User avatar
Jade Muggeridge
 
Posts: 3439
Joined: Mon Nov 20, 2006 6:51 pm

Post » Thu Dec 08, 2011 5:02 pm

The Nook tablet is coming out in a couple of weeks, too. From the specs it looks like it is slightly more powerful then the Fire. B&N doesn't have the same kind of content library that Amazon has so it looks like the Nook will depend on other providers like Netflix and Hulu.


B&N searchability for ebook titles also svcks which is a major drawback. But I agree that the Nook is actually a better device - and - it supports color.
User avatar
Charlie Ramsden
 
Posts: 3434
Joined: Fri Jun 15, 2007 7:53 pm

Post » Thu Dec 08, 2011 12:59 pm

For $200, it looks pretty good to me. I've got one on pre-order. It does make sense to wait for the reviews of the new B&N color Nook, though, if you're not already tied to the Amazon ecoysystem.

Personally, the specs don't matter so much to me, especially with free storage on the Amazon cloud. I'll be using the Fire primarily for color cookbooks, magazines, and simple web surfing. I'll still use my eInk K3 for reading regular books.
User avatar
sas
 
Posts: 3435
Joined: Thu Aug 03, 2006 8:40 am

Post » Fri Dec 09, 2011 2:56 am

You can blame urban cell tower density making manufactures decide to shrink antenna size in order to make their phones lighter/smaller. Usually there are instructions on the Internet for popular phones for methods of properly creating and attaching an extended antenna.

There's also the option of getting a Nokia N9 (or one of the Windows phones they're releasing in places that don't get the N9, though I gather those will be inferior in processing power and stuff). Having a polycarbonate body greatly improves reception, and I can say from first hand experience that it has great call quality and all that :nod:. I'm also a bit of a Meego fan :hehe: (for various reasons that I won't go into here).

I recall having something else to say, but I forgot it :(.
User avatar
Yvonne Gruening
 
Posts: 3503
Joined: Mon Apr 23, 2007 7:31 pm

Post » Thu Dec 08, 2011 7:43 pm

I recall having something else to say, but I forgot it :(.


About Kindle Fire? :lol:
User avatar
Lizs
 
Posts: 3497
Joined: Mon Jul 17, 2006 11:45 pm

Post » Thu Dec 08, 2011 6:27 pm

BEHOLD! A real tablet:

http://www.engadget.com/2011/11/09/transformer-prime-detailed-10-inch-super-ips-display-12-hour/ ($500)

12 Hour battery life + 6 with dock for a total of 18 hours of available battery life -- Nvidia says it'll get 12 hours of battery life watching constant 1080p video
32 GB internal memory (upgradable to 64 GB for an additional $100)
Guaranteed ICS update by year's end
An incredibly impressive 1280 x 800, Super IPS+ Gorilla Glass display
1 GB RAM
HDMI out, GPS, gyroscope, microSD (allowing for an additional 32 GB storage), 1.2 MP front-facing and 8MP back-facing camera

Dock (additional $150) adds:
already mentioned 6 hours additional battery life
full-sized USB port (allowing for additional storage)
Standard SD slot (allowing for an additional 64 GB storage)

http://www.engadget.com/2011/11/09/nvidia-says-tegra-3-is-a-pc-class-cpu-has-screenshots-to-prov/

Starting price of the iPad 2? $500 for 16 GB internal memory, not expandable through SD cards, no USB, not a quad core, not an IPS+ screen, not widescreen, only rated for 10 hours of standard use (not 12 hours of constant video watching), no keyboard dock (at least not as integrated as the Transformer's).

And of course it's completely laughable to compare the Kindle Fire to this beast of a machine.
User avatar
Kelly Tomlinson
 
Posts: 3503
Joined: Sat Jul 08, 2006 11:57 pm

Post » Thu Dec 08, 2011 9:36 pm

No! Don't tempt me! I don't need a tablet! I don't!
User avatar
Kay O'Hara
 
Posts: 3366
Joined: Sun Jan 14, 2007 8:04 pm

Post » Fri Dec 09, 2011 1:21 am

No! Don't tempt me! I don't need a tablet! I don't!

18 hours battery life and Nvidia is going to be marketing their Tegra 3 chip for gaming means it'll be the first decent laptop-like gaming device. Oh, and since it'll get ICS it'll have full gamepad support if you want to use a controller instead of the screen, and of course you can just use they keyboard with a mouse if you prefer that.

:evil: :deal: :evil:
User avatar
M!KkI
 
Posts: 3401
Joined: Sun Jul 16, 2006 7:50 am

Next

Return to Othor Games