Life on Earth and elsewhere...

Post » Wed Dec 07, 2011 1:54 am

i just hope that if we encounter intelligent life we have the good sense to nuke the [censored] out of it. after they get a hold of our probes with their shiny gold records and pictures of people holding hands :yuck: they are going to think we are a bunch of panzies. we need to let them know that we are perfectly capable of destroying them if they try and attack us.

I know this is all hypothetical, but I feel obliged to say this:

Genocide is bad, mmkay?
User avatar
naomi
 
Posts: 3400
Joined: Tue Jul 11, 2006 2:58 pm

Post » Wed Dec 07, 2011 4:47 pm

I was trieing too say that maybe MAYBE once Jupiter wasn't always that way or any other planet may have harbored life. Earth for example used too be a water planet yet life managed. Everything changes including planets.

Sure, but Jupiter is big. To reach the size it has, it must have taken millions upon millions of years. And in the hypothesis that it once was like the earth, and became into a gas giant, doesn't seem plausible. It's not like was something solid, then vaporized into gas all of the sudden. But that's just what I'd guess.

i just hope that if we encounter intelligent life we have the good sense to nuke the [censored] out of it. after they get a hold of our probes with their shiny gold records and pictures of people holding hands :yuck: they are going to think we are a bunch of panzies. we need to let them know that we are perfectly capable of destroying them if they try and attack us.

What's ironic then, is that we become the hostile alien invaders hell bent on war and genocide.
User avatar
Stephanie Kemp
 
Posts: 3329
Joined: Sun Jun 25, 2006 12:39 am

Post » Wed Dec 07, 2011 3:19 pm

I know this is all hypothetical, but I feel obliged to say this:

Genocide is bad, mmkay?


there machines, how can it be genocide? im not committing murder when i unplug my freezer.
User avatar
YO MAma
 
Posts: 3321
Joined: Thu Dec 21, 2006 8:24 am

Post » Wed Dec 07, 2011 12:59 pm

there machines, how can it be genocide? im not committing murder when i unplug my freezer.


Now I'm a little confused. It sounded like you said something about "nuking the [censored] out of" first contact. What exactly did you mean then?
User avatar
Vicky Keeler
 
Posts: 3427
Joined: Wed Aug 23, 2006 3:03 am

Post » Wed Dec 07, 2011 4:33 am

Now I'm a little confused. It sounded like you said something about "nuking the [censored] out of" first contact. What exactly did you mean then?


oh.......in my earlier post i explained that its more than likely that they will be machines ala terminator that killed off the species that created them. :) on the off chance that they arent machines then simply destroying a mountain chain or vaporizing a lake should hopefully be enough of a deterrent. either way we have to do something to counteract the horrible decision to send out golden hippie records. :facepalm: we are the laughing stock of the galaxy right now. when the aliens talk about humans they probably think we are all part of some church ladies book club. we look like a bunch of pussies.
User avatar
Sierra Ritsuka
 
Posts: 3506
Joined: Mon Dec 11, 2006 7:56 am

Post » Wed Dec 07, 2011 9:13 am

oh.......in my earlier post i explained that its more than likely that they will be machines ala terminator that killed off the species that created them. :) on the off chance that they arent machines then simply destroying a mountain chain or vaporizing a lake should hopefully be enough of a deterrent. either way we have to do something to counteract the horrible decision to send out golden hippie records. :facepalm: we are the laughing stock of the galaxy right now. when the aliens talk about humans they probably think we are all part of some church ladies book club. we look like a bunch of pussies.


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Voyager_2 wants to fight you.

:verymad:
User avatar
Gwen
 
Posts: 3367
Joined: Sun Apr 01, 2007 3:34 am

Post » Wed Dec 07, 2011 8:41 am

I'm assuming the words I chose were a bit confusing, so I edited to clarify. I guess what I am trying to get at is not the debate of whether there could be life, (intelligent or not) but the question of whether or not there could be organisms that go against our current understanding of what classifies as life.


Oh! well pff.. Ya there is always going to be something that comes along to stump our current understanding of what classifies life. I know there is way more stuff out there that we haven't even begun to understand yet. I am pretty sure there are still things on our planet that we haven't figured out yet, or haven't even found yet that could alter what we think classifies life.
User avatar
i grind hard
 
Posts: 3463
Joined: Sat Aug 18, 2007 2:58 am

Post » Wed Dec 07, 2011 4:08 am

Oh! well pff.. Ya there is always going to be something that comes along to stump our current understanding of what classifies life. I know there is way more stuff out there that we haven't even begun to understand yet. I am pretty sure there are still things on our planet that we haven't figured out yet, or haven't even found yet that could alter what we think classifies life.


But as of yet, there is no "living" thing found that doesn't utilize the six critical elements of life: carbon, hydrogen, nitrogen, oxygen, phosphorus, and sulfur. That was the whole basis of the Wolfe-Simon study. The bacterium in question were thought to be able to utilize arsenic in place of phosphorus.
User avatar
Jodie Bardgett
 
Posts: 3491
Joined: Sat Jul 29, 2006 9:38 pm

Post » Wed Dec 07, 2011 9:16 am

But as of yet, there is no "living" thing found that doesn't utilize the six critical elements of life: carbon, hydrogen, nitrogen, oxygen, phosphorus, and sulfur. That was the whole basis of the Wolfe-Simon study. The bacterium in question were thought to be able to utilize arsenic in place of phosphorus.


those are the key words though "as of yet." What I meant was there will always be something that will make the human race think differently. I'm not sure if you thought I meant short term or long term. I meant long term.
User avatar
Sweet Blighty
 
Posts: 3423
Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:39 am

Post » Wed Dec 07, 2011 4:51 am

oh.......in my earlier post i explained that its more than likely that they will be machines ala terminator that killed off the species that created them. :) on the off chance that they arent machines then simply destroying a mountain chain or vaporizing a lake should hopefully be enough of a deterrent. either way we have to do something to counteract the horrible decision to send out golden hippie records. :facepalm: we are the laughing stock of the galaxy right now. when the aliens talk about humans they probably think we are all part of some church ladies book club. we look like a bunch of pussies.

OR :
Amazingly advanced philosophical aliens, who grew beyond war when they were at a much lower technology level than us, and used their racial unification to develop as a species and explore the stars, reach Earth and realise we lied in our advertising.
User avatar
Budgie
 
Posts: 3518
Joined: Sat Oct 14, 2006 2:26 pm

Post » Wed Dec 07, 2011 6:45 am

OR :
Amazingly advanced philosophical aliens, who grew beyond war when they were at a much lower technology level than us, and used their racial unification to develop as a species and explore the stars, reach Earth and realise we lied in our advertising.


racial unification, growing beyond war, philosophy practicing aliens........

what are you smoking......pass it around cause i want some. :rofl:

i do agree with the false advertising part though. what we should have sent are movies like the godfather, clint eastwood movies, the sopranos collection and star wars and bragged about our fleet of death stars that could annihilate entire solar systems at will. that will keep them nervous and at bay.......hopefully long enough for us to actually build a fleet of planet annihilating death stars.
User avatar
Hot
 
Posts: 3433
Joined: Sat Dec 01, 2007 6:22 pm

Post » Wed Dec 07, 2011 7:56 am

@eindecker: OOH, a fellow Pop Sci subscriber,

I do think there is life in the cosmos that doesn't operate according to our laws.

Intelligent life? Sometimes I doubt we found that yet even on Earth.
User avatar
Kelvin
 
Posts: 3405
Joined: Sat Nov 17, 2007 10:22 am

Post » Wed Dec 07, 2011 2:46 pm

some of the guys at work were talking about some guy who is supposed to be a genius or something who talks about all kinds of conspiracy stuff but specificly they were talking about this guy and a video of buzz aldrin talking about how they found aliens on the moon and the aliens told them to never come back or some nonsense like that.

obvious I think that is all bunk, but I could not even find this video (I found some videos of buzz aldrin talking about a phenomenon they encountered but the videos take and edit out the context of what he is saying).

any ways... any body know of this guy/video. my coworkers say that this genius guy can't be proven wrong so I want to see him my self so I can point out to them every detail of why they are stupid.
User avatar
patricia kris
 
Posts: 3348
Joined: Tue Feb 13, 2007 5:49 am

Post » Wed Dec 07, 2011 1:31 am

Intelligent life? Sometimes I doubt we found that yet even on Earth.

Anything that doesn't build weapons of mass destruction can be called intelligent. In fact, I think that since we did build them in first place, only proves how low and primitive we truly are.
User avatar
Alexis Estrada
 
Posts: 3507
Joined: Tue Aug 29, 2006 6:22 pm

Post » Wed Dec 07, 2011 8:04 am

Anything that doesn't build weapons of mass destruction can be called intelligent. In fact, I think that since we did build them in first place, only proves how low and primitive we truly are.


how advanced or primitive a species may be is irrelevant considering the context that even though we may consider ants very primitive compared to our technology such as automobiles and electronics even though ants and most insects are more efficient and successful than humans.

ultimately much of what the human race considers to be advanced or vital in defining the achievements of life forms are completely irrelevant to survival or beneficial to the species ability to become more successful. if yo consider the fact of it, all most every part of your daily job is dedicated to the production of luxuries that are not necessary to survival as a species, unless you work in agriculture or production of building materials and so on.
User avatar
Dean Ashcroft
 
Posts: 3566
Joined: Wed Jul 25, 2007 1:20 am

Post » Wed Dec 07, 2011 5:33 pm

racial unification, growing beyond war, philosophy practicing aliens........

what are you smoking......pass it around cause i want some. :rofl:

i do agree with the false advertising part though. what we should have sent are movies like the godfather, clint eastwood movies, the sopranos collection and star wars and bragged about our fleet of death stars that could annihilate entire solar systems at will. that will keep them nervous and at bay.......hopefully long enough for us to actually build a fleet of planet annihilating death stars.

And there you have humanity in a nutshell. Let's prepare for war. Why? Well, everyone else is. How do we know that? Well we are, so everyone else must be too; besides, it's just human nature, of course they are looking for a fight.
User avatar
Louise Andrew
 
Posts: 3333
Joined: Mon Nov 27, 2006 8:01 am

Post » Wed Dec 07, 2011 2:18 pm

how advanced or primitive a species may be is irrelevant considering the context that even though we may consider ants very primitive compared to our technology such as automobiles and electronics even though ants and most insects are more efficient and successful than humans.

ultimately much of what the human race considers to be advanced or vital in defining the achievements of life forms are completely irrelevant to survival or beneficial to the species ability to become more successful. if yo consider the fact of it, all most every part of your daily job is dedicated to the production of luxuries that are not necessary to survival as a species, unless you work in agriculture or production of building materials and so on.

Eh, what? My point simply were that if you think you need WMDs, you shouldn't get WMDs. And that already having them is a testament to how destructive and primitive human nature is.

obvious I think that is all bunk, but I could not even find this video (I found some videos of buzz aldrin talking about a phenomenon they encountered but the videos take and edit out the context of what he is saying).

Aldrin stated that he saw unidentified objects that could have been some panels that had gotten loose. Not some phenomena or aliens. His clarifications were actually bluntly ignored, and made him look like some crackpot, though it didn't last long, I think.
User avatar
Life long Observer
 
Posts: 3476
Joined: Fri Sep 08, 2006 7:07 pm

Post » Wed Dec 07, 2011 4:52 pm

If there's life out there, regardless of what kind, we should leave it the [censored] alone.



+1 for the Sadist King.

+2
We can barely get to the bottom of the oceans of this planet or be politically friendly with other nations so the idea of trying to contact an alien species, which won't know English, is stupid as naturally it will become violent.
I like believeing that there is other things out there besides us on Earth but I'd rather we knew everything about this planet and how to peacefully live on it before we go stroming onto other planets
User avatar
Lucie H
 
Posts: 3276
Joined: Tue Mar 13, 2007 11:46 pm

Post » Wed Dec 07, 2011 1:00 am

You can't say with certainty that there is, just as you cannot say with certainty that there isn't. I'm surprised that all the so called 'believers in science' already assume other life based on no evidence. (Besides of course Martian Bacteria and other localized things). The scientific point of view is that we know nothing conclusive right now, and any assertion otherwise is unscientific.

That being said, I don't like science anyway, I prefer (want) to believe what the X-Files taught me. They're already here. :poke:


The so called "believers in science" can just use logic to tell us there is (almost certainly life out there).

As the size of the universe tends towards infinity, the chances of there being other life tends towards one. And we all know how big the universe is ;).
User avatar
Riky Carrasco
 
Posts: 3429
Joined: Tue Nov 06, 2007 12:17 am

Post » Wed Dec 07, 2011 5:57 am

It's near impossible that we would be the only living being in the universe studying it.
User avatar
Andrew Tarango
 
Posts: 3454
Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2007 10:07 am

Post » Wed Dec 07, 2011 4:49 am

There is no doubt that the amazing combination of natural selection and random chance can and has produced things far beyond what we could ever imagine.

This is why I have trouble ever enjoying movies with aliens. They're always so unrealistically similar to life on Earth that I can't bear it. Bipeds, with heads, eyes, ears, mouths, arms, legs, skeletons, muscles, feet, hands, veins, scales, teeth... I could go on forever.

While I'm sure there there are anologous parts on many alien organisms, and maybe even exact structural copies (the eye has evolved multiple times, independently just here on earth), I suspect that there are complex organisms that have almost none of these attributes, and I'm tired of people designing boring aliens for fiction.

One interesting concept that deserves lots of exploration is organisms where the line between colonies of unicellular, and multicellular organisms blurs. What is a human but a colony of clones created by a self-replicating cell, that have differentiated in response to environmental conditions? There are other organisms that we consider unicellular, but have differentiated individuals that serve different roles within a colony.
User avatar
Kelli Wolfe
 
Posts: 3440
Joined: Thu Aug 23, 2007 7:09 am

Post » Wed Dec 07, 2011 3:22 am

@eindecker: OOH, a fellow Pop Sci subscriber,



Yeah, I love Pop Sci.. My sis got me my recent subscription as a gift, and as soon as I got that first issue, I forgot how much I missed it.

how advanced or primitive a species may be is irrelevant considering the context that even though we may consider ants very primitive compared to our technology such as automobiles and electronics even though ants and most insects are more efficient and successful than humans.

ultimately much of what the human race considers to be advanced or vital in defining the achievements of life forms are completely irrelevant to survival or beneficial to the species ability to become more successful. if yo consider the fact of it, all most every part of your daily job is dedicated to the production of luxuries that are not necessary to survival as a species, unless you work in agriculture or production of building materials and so on.


Well stated.
I often think about how trivial our work and lives are at times, especially those who's only aspirations are being more popular and wealthy than the next.


There is no doubt that the amazing combination of natural selection and random chance can and has produced things far beyond what we could ever imagine.

This is why I have trouble ever enjoying movies with aliens. They're always so unrealistically similar to life on Earth that I can't bear it. Bipeds, with heads, eyes, ears, mouths, arms, legs, skeletons, muscles, feet, hands, veins, scales, teeth... I could go on forever.

While I'm sure there there are anologous parts on many alien organisms, and maybe even exact structural copies (the eye has evolved multiple times, independently just here on earth), I suspect that there are complex organisms that have almost none of these attributes, and I'm tired of people designing boring aliens for fiction.

One interesting concept that deserves lots of exploration is organisms where the line between colonies of unicellular, and multicellular organisms blurs. What is a human but a colony of clones created by a self-replicating cell, that have differentiated in response to environmental conditions? There are other organisms that we consider unicellular, but have differentiated individuals that serve different roles within a colony.


One thing that has always fascinated me are colonies of microorganisms working together to perform the function of one larger, more complex organism, such as Siphonophores.
User avatar
Emma Louise Adams
 
Posts: 3527
Joined: Wed Jun 28, 2006 4:15 pm

Post » Wed Dec 07, 2011 11:38 am

how advanced or primitive a species may be is irrelevant considering the context that even though we may consider ants very primitive compared to our technology such as automobiles and electronics even though ants and most insects are more efficient and successful than humans.

ultimately much of what the human race considers to be advanced or vital in defining the achievements of life forms are completely irrelevant to survival or beneficial to the species ability to become more successful. if yo consider the fact of it, all most every part of your daily job is dedicated to the production of luxuries that are not necessary to survival as a species, unless you work in agriculture or production of building materials and so on.



actually technology is the defining factor. 99% of all species that have existed on earth are now extinct. some of them were massive and powerful and others extremely adaptable even leaving the waters and migrating to land. yet the vast majority of them are long gone simply because they are slaves to their environments. humans have the capability of surviving in a much broader range of environments than any other species save leprechauns. and those are magical so its not a fair comparison. its all do to are ability to shape the environment around us to suit are needs. given enough time we will be conquering the galaxy one solar system at a time with a clone/droid armies and fleets of deathstars. no other species on earth will be able to make that claim. and since its a matter of if and not when the next giant object collides with earth even if we cant deflect it ourselves we will have colonies elsewhere.

someone brought up the point of we cant even get along with other countries even when they speak the same language. imagine the possible miscommunications that could occur from two completely different species. the best example i have ever seen was a campy twighlight zone where aliens appeared to detonate a large explosion on the side of the moon. humanity interpreted it as threat and a display of force but in actuality the aliens where showing off a form of inifinite energy but we werent sophisticated enough to recognize it. i definitely agree with the avoid at all costs or if not possible scare the [censored] out of with some nukes method.
User avatar
Eve Booker
 
Posts: 3300
Joined: Thu Jul 20, 2006 7:53 pm

Post » Wed Dec 07, 2011 3:20 pm

99.99%.
User avatar
{Richies Mommy}
 
Posts: 3398
Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 2:40 pm

Post » Wed Dec 07, 2011 11:20 am

The Universe is too big to not have life in it other than our own ( No guarantee that we will ever see any of it though)
User avatar
Steven Nicholson
 
Posts: 3468
Joined: Mon Jun 18, 2007 1:24 pm

PreviousNext

Return to Othor Games