How is it coming along? Will the mod be out today? Or tomorrow? Or?
Not to stress ofcourse I just can't wait for it :thumbsup: :thumbsup:

nVamp will be out in a few hours. Our main page at http://www.risegaming.com/nvamp is being updated to show the proper installation, credits, etc. You can watch the progress before our launch as I finish up the pages. Soon as they're done, the Nexus page will go live and we'll be ready to get this party started.

-Vaernus

I am just downloading all the mods from http://risegaming.com/nvamp/?page_id=19 right now. But I have encountered two problems so far: "More Challenges" doesn't have a proper link, so I had to search for it at tesnexus. And World of Pain Serial Killer addon is removed and nowhere at all to be found. I'll report back when I get further

Serial Killers has been removed from Nexus, and subsequently nVamp. I am currently updating the installation instructions based on v0.11 of nVamp which has changed a bit since the current readme up on the site.

-Vaernus

For anyone who has been just checking this thread and not the official forums/tesnexus, nVamp is now live! Time to play!

The RELz thread can be found here: http://www.gamesas.com/index.php?/topic/1164997-relz-nvamp-new-vegas-advanced-mod-project/
This topic can be closed.

Congrats on the release!

I just want to use this, project Nevada, a house mod, and maybe a companion mod. Do you recommend for me to use FNVedit to create a patch so this works well with Project Nevada? Are you guys planning on making a patch full computability between the two?

Thanks again!

Project Nevada support is already built into nVamp. All the rest shouldn't interfere at all. Would still recommend running FNVEdit. To be honest, if you're using nVamp, you'll be using Wrye Bash to build the bashed patch for it to work properly. Can use Wrye Bash to build the patch while your other mods are there as well.

-Vaernus

Currently, import graphics for wrye is broken because of FOOK.

Is this needed for anything or can I ignore this feature?

Can ignore that function for the time being.