That's a very poor stance on the matter if you ask me.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adverse_possession#Squatter.27s_rights Not sure if it's particularly relevant or useful though.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adverse_possession#Squatter.27s_rights Not sure if it's particularly relevant or useful though.
Adverse possession wouldn't work in this case, because the op neither "posseses" the property, changes it significantly, or is hostile to the owner. The OP would be a tenant as far as the laws are concerned.
