The OP isn't "factually" wrong. You can get off your high horse though, if you don't mind. Your arrogance is not appreciated.
And by the way, facts are not arrogant. Facts simply are. Conclusions supported by facts are not arrogant either. Suggesting that someone is arrogant for drawing conclusions based on a number of facts, on the other hand, does strike me as fairly self-righteous and closed-minded. You want to talk about high horses? Challenge me to back up any complaint I've made and I will, and I won't make any ridiculous strawman either. Can you say the same?

