This poses an interesting conundrum... you're saying that you have willingly sunk 60 hours into something you deem a helplessly buggy game... WILLINGLY 60 HOURS without stopping somewhere along the way to consider why you are doing it, and you are saying that a game capable of that feat isn't worthy of game of the year? Sounds pretty much like a perfect candidate if it manages to pull that off tbh! <3
Its not a conundrum at all. I never said I despise the core of the game, nor the fact that under all the crap we have to deal with, it is an awesome game. But I had to play 30 hours to start having problems that made my next 30 hours unbearable. Yeah I wanted to continue and I spent most of my time in these 30 hours trying to figure out what is the cause of the problem and why.
So yeah Skyrim is a great game. If it works. And I cannot award it a GOTY award (not even candidate to be honest) just in the context of "when it works". Atm Skyrim doesnt work for a huge amount of people. It does not even constitue a game at its current form. It is unplayable, therefore it doesnt deserve to be prasied at all.
A product is judged overall, not by just how much you like it. Its like me buying a Ferrari and loving every minute my Ferrari runs. But if my ferrari keeps breaking down and is full of problems, what am I going to say as a customer? "It is the best car I ever had when it worked?"
Ofc not, I will call it junk. Because I cannot use it at all, no matter how awesome it was when it was working. No conundrum at all. Game was good when it worked....game doesnt work...I feel robbed as a customer because if I knew this beforehand I would never had bought it. Thats for sure.