game endings are stupid and not very rewarding. playing the game is rewarding, looking at slides for 5 minutes is not rewarding and i got news for you but elder scrolls games and even fallout games do not end like new vegas ended, so get a clue. oblviion blew new vegas out of the water and it doens't have an ending , the new elder scrolls game will not having an ending like new vegas had, and it will be a good game, most games with "endings" svck. so obsidian needed to get that from FO3. they did make a great game, even though it dind't have the dungeon crawling to do or quite the combat FO3 had, but your idea of a game having to have an ending isn't cutting it, new vegas could of been better if it didn't have that last mission. the game rating is only 7.5 and thats a lot lower than FO3 or oblivion, and mostly ist because of the stupid ending,
Play fallout games aside from 3, that comment is so [censored] stupid its funny, get a clue, maybe if you played more fallout you would be used to the games ending.
Your oppinion... And a funny one at that.
Your oppinion, which is worthless.
The game couldnt properly show the effects of the choices you make, atleast not without a long delay, if you want a shallow game crawl back to fallout 3 or oblivion.
And for [censored]s sake this is dlc, not the main game, so shut it about the ending, its not related tothis, unless you are posting in the dlc suggestion thread.
Nice to see you walked around the part where I said it was your fault yyo uwere warned it would end. And instead of [censored]ing about them needing dlc, why not just not do the last mission, its not [censored] hard.
