I have a few problems with this thread.
Everything I've found in regards to the charges or racism are second hand accounts from dubious sources ("The Bear of Markarth" being written by a Imperial Scribe who also wrote a sympathetic book about the Forsworn standing out in my head).
Madanach seems pretty convinced the nords brutalized their kind. Not in defense of those Forsworn wackos, as I rather like the Stormcloaks more than them, but you can not say this above in such a fashion as if it being written by an Imperial scribe invalidates the entire thing.
Also, the Dunmer flat out admit to only settling in Windhelm because it was the first city out of Morrowind, plus Windhelm's a old city built into the mountains and the decree to allow refugees came from the High King in Solitude, who I'd point out doesn't have to figure out where to house these refugees.
Yeah. He doesn't have to figure out how to house and handle the refugee population. Because he's dead. We should really catch and bring to justice whoever did that, since it's a real shame someone killed him before he could really handle all that. >_>
I don't know, maybe it's me but I really am getting irked at all these "racist" comments. It just smacks of hyper sensitivity to me. "Racism" to me involves Lynch Mobs and the setting fire to effigies or the 1940s Warner Brothers Looney Toon Cartoons.
Do ghettos sound racist to you?
Now, I do agree that people seem to take 'racism' and immediate think that he is trying to commit genocide on every race but the blonde, blue eyed master race, which is not true. However, actions do speak louder than words, and just because he is not going out of his way to hinder people, does not make him completely free of blame. I could come up with numerous real-world comparisons where national leaders themselves were not racist, but through lack of action racist government policies became a major issue with the body.
We beat the Falmer when Skyrim was the Falmer's home territory. If any sissies from Summerset want to try their hand at storming Solitude, they are welcome to try and die.
I see this arguement in favor of the Stormcloaks a lot, but I find it weird. If the combined might of the Imperial Legion (Drawing from MANY provinces, including Skyrim forces) could not beat the combined might of the Aldmeri Dominion, what makes people think that a single province could beat the combined might of the Aldmeri Dominion, drawing on their various provinces? The obvious answer would be 'Hammerfell', but the game makes efforts to explain that the Hammerfell forces did not have to fight the combined might of the Aldmeri - the Aldmeri were ground to dust themselves fighting the Imperials. As well, rogue Imperial elements aided Hammerfell.
My point is that Ulfric isn't that bad of a guy. I think he is actually pretty cool, as a person. I would SO do quests for him if he were just a normal quest giver or something. He is a pretty awful leader though. Ulfric is like Braveheart. He is a warrior and an inspiration to his people. However, he is not a governor. Those would be the Imperials. If you want stability, order, true equality, prosperity and a lasting 'Empire' (See what I did there?) then you side with the Imperials. If you want a warm fuzzy feeling, the idea that you are doing the 'right' thing, to fight for 'justice', and fighting against 'the machine' or 'stagnation', then you should side with Ulfric.
I do not mean to say either are bad things. Both have their place. I am saying Ulfric should not be a leader. Back to the Braveheart comparison, the man himself (EDIT:Braveheart, that is) said that he is just a fighter, not a law-maker or a penny-pincher or any other metaphor for a king or what have you. Paraphrased, of course.