Perhaps the sequel will be like a naval version of the book "Mortal Engines," where floating cities travel a post-apocalyptic ocean-world consuming each other for resources.

Its a island made for experiments, the world didn't go any where. You test subjects are just ignorant to the fact.

I would like to see some type of quarantine.

:flamethrower:i think that mabe this is all a test to see if the ark can last 20 y ears out in the ocean without the rest of the world. oviusly the test if failing :flamethrower:

Oh well Brink is a work of fiction. they'll probably ignore that base thing.



Thank you.

2012 was the beginning of the end..and now this is the outcome..

My conjecture is that at first, due to the flood, all coastal regions had to be dealt with. Now, knowing that over 70% of the world would have been water, shorelines would have been decimated. This means that coastal regions would probably be the main focus of the whole world. Island-states would be absolutely devastated, such as Japan and the Philippines, as would Austrailia, the UK, and the like, as well as (obviously) every coastal town, village, city, or metropolis near the Oceans of the world. There are far too many to name, and I wouldn't know them all.

Because of this focus, the Ark would have mainly been forgotten about in favor for rebuilding / reclaiming / scavenging what's left of the coastal areas. Granted, a few people may remember, but that's why there are only 50 thousand people on the Ark, instead of much more. An event of global catastrophe such as this has the possibility of holding the Earth's attention for many years. There are plenty major establishments on the coasts to go around for everyone.

Sounds abit like fallout, valuts built to save people from nuclear war but secretly most of them are made to do social expermints, such as 1 man and 500 woman, air filled with psychotic drugs, planning the vault to be closed forever and see how they handle life. But i doubt that the ark was ment for this, well, besides the experiments they were doing there (secret weapons, new technology, etc.)

Nah, I'm not sure they'd build a multi billion dollar floating city just to see how a group of people would do while locked in with an angry panther. I think the Ark is much more serious business than the Vaults.

BRINK-o-shock?


According to this theory, the Universe will end with the Big Crunch, by the way.

No its called "The big OM NOM NOM"

that is the sound of a giant Tapir eating the universe. or maybe a :turtle: ...or whatever this thing is --> :cheat:

I thought it was suppost to be a troll. Maybe trolls ate the rest of the world.

No.

What really happend to the main land?

Chuck norris happend.

He decided it was time, or what? He just took a piss and now the whole world is displaced.

If that was true, someone would have pulled the plug on the project because of the civil war. :facepalm:

No, he just got bored.

So he said to the world "Flood, will ya?" And so it did. The holy land of Texas was the only place the Norris spared, and all the places that defied the flood were cursed upon with civil war. And so it was.

Amen.

Well eventually the world would cool again adn Ice Caps would reform. But...

Ice takes up more space than water and a lot of the ice at the poles is underwater so if the poles melted the water levels wouldn't increase enough for continents to flood!

How about there is land but over population causes fight for space food etc and regular people start killing and eating each other.

Not whole continents. But there is quite a big pile of ice floating around the north pole.

Well if the world was being heated by pollution like they say it is in the game, then no, it would be a permanent, irreversible change.

In a private conversation I had with him, Paul Wedgwood confirmed that Brink takes place in the Waterworld universe.

And in the last chapter you find out that the leader of the Ark is Moses and it's actually the distant past, not the near future. The Ark is also Atlantis. The End.

*spoilers above*