I know Obsidian is working on it but i am impatiently anxious to see the burned man,it normally takes about 2-3 months to devlop dlc even less so are we experting a late febuary or march realise?

I havent heard of a confirmed date yet so i doubt anyone here knows

I didn't even know they announced the next DLC yet?
But if it is coming out, I would assume within the next 2-3 months (that is just my guess I have no basis for those dates).

Obsidian claimed the rights to some names for the New Vegas DLC Honest Hearts was one of them.

Another DLC, Hmm? I'm still waiting on the first one. They shouldn't release any more until everybody gets the first one, not just some people. That's just my opinion on the matter.

I agree I think its not fair that they release content just for Xbox. I understand they are a business and probably made a deal with Microsoft and all of that, but still I would have imagine they would have a lot more sales if they sell to all 3 groups instead of just one.

That's how I think of it too. They probably will release the next DLC a month or two after this exclusivity runs out with Microsoft on the Dead Money DLC.

Keep in mind too that Obsidian is a pretty small organization. The fact that they work at the pace that they are right now boggles me.

I have a feeling that the DLC might not be released for the other systems for quite awhile, if at all :cryvaultboy:

I think it will the PC version has an ingame DLC store (which currently has no products) so I doubt they would have added that if there will be no DLC.

Of course we're getting it. If not, chaos will break out on Earth, Fan boys will burn down everything in sight, blood will be splattered across the walls. :flame: But fortunately we won't have to do this. :laugh:

I laugh at you guys. Life isn't fair. Xbox users pay monthly, get over it.

You don't need to pay a monthly fee for Fallout, only for Xbox live games.

Which has nothing to with buying Fallout DLC. It's like saying I deserve it too because I pay bills.

Don't think of it as we get it because we pay. I think it as we are testing the dlc, which to me seems fair since there appears to be so many bugs. Such as the one i have where on all my different characters i can't leave the sierra madre after dlc completion without my game crashing. Would you rather get it later when most of the problems are fixed or now when half of users are getting gamebreaking bugs.

Yeah we're the hamsters in this freaky experiment being subjected to bugs like the one that makes the Holorifle an uber indestructible killing machine... Oh wait! That's a good thing. :laugh:

if its anything like dead money i will not buy it.

Well I do realize that Obsidian is smaller than Bethesda but when The Sacrifice came out for L4D2 I was all played out, I tried it a couple of times on Versus then a couple of times on Realism Versus and then just put the game on the shelf.
I'm doubtful that when Lonesome Road comes out that people are still going to be as interested in New Vegas anymore. (I'm going to buy it for lore but I'm sure that I will have overplayed New Vegas so much by then that after it's done I'm just going to throw the game in a drawer until Skyrim comes out.)
Soooo...
Obsidian should drop the small DLC crap and spend time on one large expansion pack instead.
The amount of time and money they put in on four small DLC's would be way better spent on one large expansion.
And if the rumour is true that they are going to do 7 DLC's... I just don't see it as very profitable

That's what you get for not supporting Microsoft! :angel:

and netflix on xbox 360
acursed foolish microsoft making me pay fees

DLC is more profitable. And they are just a developer while Bethesda is the publisher. Publishers usually call the shots.

The DLC might be more profitable.
But I dunno how many people will still be interested in NV by the 4th DLC let alone the 7th.
And whether their time and money put into those DLC's and the amount of consumers buying them is a good ratio or not.
So an expansion would cost as much as 3 DLC's would cost, instead of spending time and money on some small 7 hour arcade games (Which would likely take them a half year to develop if not more.) they could instead spend their time on one large expansion instead and it'd be just as profitable if not more and it'd give us consumers a lot more content.
Just saying.

Point of profit with smaller DLC's is to release a lot of them under a short time.
Considering we haven't even heard anything about Honest Hearts of if it even is the next DLC I'd say that the development time between the DLC's is going to be longer than FO3's.
If it's longer that means that more time is put on it which could be put elsewhere.
I don't see it as being as profitable.
So instead of taking a long ass time to deliver a couple of small DLC's which hardly "adds" content to the game it'd be better to spend that time on a new game or an expansion.
Both for them and for us.

But I don't know a lot about the gaming industries economy so I'm just speculating here.

I enjoyed Dead Money. It was unique from other Fallout DLCs and even other Fallout Missions. I wouldn't want another DLC concept like it, but it was kinda cool to have the Saw theme.

I really did NOT like, :flamethrower: dead money

I hope the next DLC is NOT like that one, or I want my money back for that DLC, lol
dead money was really bad. I hope the next DLC is better :hubbahubba:

I liked Dead Money, but somehow I don't have the urge to play it again on a different playthrough. In FO3 I played Anchorage, The Pitt, Lookout, Broken Steel and sometimes Zeta with every playthrough, but even though I liked it on my first playthrough, Dead Money has a really low replay value for me. Hope that's different with the other DLC's. And I would really like a Honest Hearts announcement plz D: