Who has battlefield 3? : Othor Games

» Wed Dec 07, 2011 11:46 pm

Just wondering. BF3 and skyrim are probably my most anticipated games this year.

» Wed Dec 07, 2011 10:05 pm

I'm getting it in the mail this tuesday..and oh inb4lock..or move.

» Thu Dec 08, 2011 8:56 am

This belongs in CD.

» Thu Dec 08, 2011 7:29 am

kind of irrelevant to the forum....

» Thu Dec 08, 2011 1:44 am

http://www.gamesas.com/index.php?/forum/18-community-discussion/

» Thu Dec 08, 2011 11:10 am

BF3 svcks. MW3 is still king.

» Thu Dec 08, 2011 7:38 am

nope, I am utterly bored of first person shooters - they have stagnated the industry to the point that every other game produced is a derivative sloppily made fps with zero creativity.

The only other game I'm really anticipating besides skyrim is kingdoms of amalur

» Thu Dec 08, 2011 11:21 am

This belongs in CD.

epona and link, best combination...
Ever?

» Thu Dec 08, 2011 6:33 am

already downloaded

» Thu Dec 08, 2011 1:42 am

why is there a battlefield 3 thread in the skyrim section?

» Thu Dec 08, 2011 6:55 am

It's not out yet. I'll be getting it on Tuesday.

» Thu Dec 08, 2011 9:18 am

nope, I am utterly bored of first person shooters - they have stagnated the industry to the point that every other game produced is a derivative sloppily made fps with zero creativity.

The only other game I'm really anticipating besides skyrim is kingdoms of amalur

Skadoosh!

» Thu Dec 08, 2011 8:44 am

I was devastated. Downloaded the BF3 Beta and I couldn't play it 'cos I have a DirectX 10 ATI graphics card and you need DirectX 10.1 to play the game on ATI.

For some reason NVIDIA only need DirectX 10.

Totally svcks.

» Thu Dec 08, 2011 1:57 am

BF3 svcks. MW3 is still king.

Both are just generic shooters made by money hungry companys.

» Wed Dec 07, 2011 11:33 pm

Both are just generic shooters made by money hungry companys.

Not really. BF3 is actually a lot of fun and very different than most games such as halo, killzone, cod, etc.

» Thu Dec 08, 2011 2:57 am

Both are just generic shooters made by money hungry companys.

That's entirely wrong. Just because publishers like Activision are only in it for the money, the devs still care about the game.

» Wed Dec 07, 2011 11:50 pm

BF3 svcks. MW3 is still king.

Ok sure whatever you say /sarcasm

I am getting BF3, will tide me over till Skyrim

» Thu Dec 08, 2011 9:56 am

money hungry companys.

I've never heard of a company not wanting to make money?
Go back and Occupy Wall St.

» Wed Dec 07, 2011 9:53 pm

Wrong section man.

» Thu Dec 08, 2011 4:00 am

Both are just generic shooters made by money hungry companys.

Whoa, whoa! Say what you want about COD but leave Battlefield alone. I've been playing since BF2 and the series is great. 64-Person battles in a massive map with tanks, jeeps, jets and everything else.

Battlefield reminds me of Command & Conquer: Renegade.

» Thu Dec 08, 2011 11:10 am

I've never heard of a company not wanting to make money?
Go back and Occupy Wall St.

^^This!

» Thu Dec 08, 2011 11:39 am

I'll be picking up my copy on tuesday

inb4moved

» Thu Dec 08, 2011 9:54 am

Both are just generic shooters made by money hungry companys.

You're wrong, every developer must care for their product ~~if they want to make money,~~ well it's the publisher that wants the money...
And BF > COD.
I no longer praise you.

bliviongate:

» Thu Dec 08, 2011 8:13 am

Both are just generic shooters made by money hungry companys.

How dare companies try to make money!

» Wed Dec 07, 2011 9:30 pm

Both are just generic shooters made by money hungry companys.

The only difference is that BF3 is great, MW3 isn't.